|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-22-2008, 07:34 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
|
Thick or thin cab bushings?
I have searched for an answer but cannot find one. I got a new set of rubber cab bushings with my truck. So I want to give them a try. However they are a different thickness. Are they supposed to be? also Im sure they are not for the rad support. So can anyone please tell me if the thick ones go to the front or back of the cab. It is a complete frame off resto, so I would like to get this right before the doors and fenders go on.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
07-22-2008, 08:09 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Muskegon,MI,USA
Posts: 6,026
|
Re: Thick or thin cab bushings?
Are you working on a 2 wd or 4 wd?
Jim
__________________
1971 Shortbox step side 4x4, 350 sbc, 3:07 rear end 1965 Impala SS 400 sbc, Muncie rock crusher 1966 Impala SS 396 bbc, TH 400 1969 El Camino, 350 sbc, TH 350 1971 Snowplow built on a Blazer frame 1972 GMC Short bed, stepside, TH 400, 427 BBC |
|
|
|
|
07-22-2008, 09:02 PM
|
#3 |
|
The Older Generation
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,656
|
Re: Thick or thin cab bushings?
-
Welcome to the board... We could use a little more information (well a lot really...  ) Good rule of thumb. If you ask a question, supply as much info on your truck as possible. Even if it doesn't seem relevant to the question you are asking there are a lot of variables on these old rigs. By the way, this is not a flame, just a heads up...1/2 ton or 3/4 ton? Chevy or GMC? High hump or low hump? I'll take a stab at it with the limited info but it may not be relevant... The rear cab mounts on 3/4 ton frames are mounted lower on the frame, so the rubber mounts are thicker. The front ones are the same, 3/4 & 1/2. If your frame is a 3/4 ton those would work, if not you will have to get a set for a 1/2 ton frame... Maybe..  LockDoc
__________________
Leon Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles (My Dually Pickup Project Thread) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820 - Last edited by LockDoc; 07-22-2008 at 09:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
07-23-2008, 12:11 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Franconia,N.H.
Posts: 1,029
|
Re: Thick or thin cab bushings?
i believe that the thicker mounts should be in the rear no matter what it is because of the design of the floor.
__________________
(Only) Member of the CPNE Fan Club  Aint that the truth 67 C-10 350 with 3-speed tranny and 308 gears swb step  82 Z28 Camaro 355 small block over 350 hp and a borg warner super t-10 (blown engine) 72 Chevy K20 Suburban (future project) 70 Chevy K20 now 68 GMC K2500 2003 Chevy 2500hd ccsb 4X4 (daily driver) |
|
|
|
|
07-23-2008, 01:03 AM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
|
Re: Thick or thin cab bushings?
Thanks for the replies and welcome. It is a 2wd, 1/2 ton. I converted the trany hump to the higher bolt in so it clears the tranny. When I look at the instructions for the energy suspension bushings there is different part # to use for the front or back bushing. For that matter, I have looked at the various part catalogue pictures but cannot figure out where the thicker ones are supposed to go. The problem is that the ones I have, came free with the truck, with no instructions. I suspect that if someone out-there has replaced theirs then they would be able to tell me if the bushings are supposed to be a different size and location.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
