The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2002, 01:02 PM   #1
VNMOUS
Step Side's Rule
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: LEIGHTON,AL USA
Posts: 227
Studebaker

I HEARD A STORY ABOUT HOW OUR TRUCKS WERE ALMOST STUDEBAKERS. DOES ANYONE KNOW ABOUT THIS?
__________________
DANO
07 Silverado Classic
67shortstep
76 stingray
95 cobra
66 Mustang Coupe 289
VNMOUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 01:13 PM   #2
Blazer1970
Registered User
 
Blazer1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Old Mission, MI, USA
Posts: 2,507
That story is not true.
__________________
Tim
Blazer1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 01:29 PM   #3
ckhd
Registered User
 
ckhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: St. Johns, Arizona
Posts: 2,660
True or not, you gotta tell the story now!
__________________
my 2¢ - t.i.o.l.i.
Bowen

1968 K20 fleet
1969 K10 swb fleet
1972 K10 Suburban
1972 C10 lwb step
1992 K1500 'burb
1995 K2500 'burb
1997 C1500 'burb
1999 K1500
2000 K1500 'burb

Why do I own so many Suburbans?
ckhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 03:41 PM   #4
VNMOUS
Step Side's Rule
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: LEIGHTON,AL USA
Posts: 227
A GUY I WORK WITH WAS TELLING ME THAT THE 1967 MODEL DESIGN WAS ORIGINALLY GOING TO BE A STUDEBAKER BUT, IT WAS BOUGHT BY GM WHEN STUDEBAKER WENT UNDER OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS ANY VALIDITY OR NOT
__________________
DANO
07 Silverado Classic
67shortstep
76 stingray
95 cobra
66 Mustang Coupe 289
VNMOUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 03:44 PM   #5
Alexis
Member since 2000
 
Alexis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mountain View Ca / Mexico
Posts: 7,874
there was a thread about this and it's true, from what i recall if i'm wrong i'm going to blame it on the beers, lol. But yeah someone had pictures to back up this "story" too.
Alexis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 04:39 PM   #6
stllookn
Saving 1 truck at a time!
 
stllookn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
The last "Stupidbaker" was built in 1966 so I guess it is possible that they might have been considering getting back into trucks but they quit truck production much earlier. They used independent design firms so it is also possible that the "design" was shopped around for other potential buyers. The designs precede produciton by about 5 years...I recall reading somewhere.
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets
'72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip)
'69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary)
stllookn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 05:25 PM   #7
dubie
Registered User
 
dubie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 8,853
It is true.The design for the 67 Chevy was based on a Studebaker . Ryan68 posted a topic about it on the old message board a couple years back and it even had a pic of the truck. I don't know if anyone is able to search that far back though.
__________________
My name's Tim and I'm a truckaholic

My 56 Chevy shop truck build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=562795
dubie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 06:03 PM   #8
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
IT IS NOT TRUE! Yes, there are some similarities in the way the front ends look, but there is not truth to the story. Chevy would have been working on the design of the 1967 truck long before the 66 Studebakers.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 06:36 PM   #9
ckhd
Registered User
 
ckhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: St. Johns, Arizona
Posts: 2,660
Talking

If it was true, it would have saved Studebaker! Just think, the website would be 67-72studebakertrucks.com.
__________________
my 2¢ - t.i.o.l.i.
Bowen

1968 K20 fleet
1969 K10 swb fleet
1972 K10 Suburban
1972 C10 lwb step
1992 K1500 'burb
1995 K2500 'burb
1997 C1500 'burb
1999 K1500
2000 K1500 'burb

Why do I own so many Suburbans?
ckhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 08:22 PM   #10
barn9
Half a bubble off!
 
barn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winfield, Ks, USA
Posts: 5,588
O.T., but a coincedence! I was at a guy's shop today and he has a Studebaker pickup body (in nice condition), sitting on a frame and running gear from an International Scout. Said he has some big tires and rims ordered for it (it is already lifted). Cool lookin' ride!
__________________
Just call me LB.
'71 Cheyenne, 402BB, hauls blondes, brunettes, or redheads.
barn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 08:32 PM   #11
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 09:17 AM   #12
Dan69 step
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Fullerton,NE
Posts: 380
As a member of the Studebaker Drivers Club and owner of some Studebakers, I believe there is some validity to this story, as I remember seeing some concept designs in the Studebaker "Turning Wheels" monthly magazine that I get. The time frame is is possible . The Avanti went from conception to production in a mere 13 months, a time line unheard of with the "big 3". After Studebaker closed its doors in South Bend in 1963, the 65 and 66 models were being produced in Canada with the cars having a GM 283 engine. I'll have to go back and see if I can find any info in my old mags.
__________________
69 short step
68 50th Anniversary Gold/ White lwb
72 2wd Blazer
63 Studebaker Avanti
85 Avanti
66 Studebaker Cruiser
49 Studebaker pickup
3-49 Studebaker 1 1/2 truck
94 White/ GMC coe (cabin hauler)
95 chev
2015 chev Duramax 2500
Dan69 step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 10:45 AM   #13
Blazer1970
Registered User
 
Blazer1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Old Mission, MI, USA
Posts: 2,507
There was a long thread on here a while back about that guy (name?) who was the designer that drew the concept that became the '67 GM pickup. He worked for GM, and there was absolutely no tie in to Studebaker. There was a drawing of an El Camino concept that was obviously the inspiration for this truck body style. The Studebaker thing was started by someone who saw some resemblance in the front end styling between some Studebaker and these trucks. The Studebaker photo was posted the last time this was beaten to death, and personally, I could not even see the resemblance.
__________________
Tim
Blazer1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 12:17 PM   #14
billogna
Registered User
 
billogna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Choctaw, OK
Posts: 235
The original '67 was designed by Harry Bentley Bradley. There was an interesting interview with him in the Jan '01 issue of Sport Truck mag, in which he talks about how he pushed for the small back window, and how GM thought the overall design was too car-like so they changed the hood in '69 to make it more truck-like, but he was working with the Cadillac team by then, and had no say in the new design. Anyway, this is the most convincing pic, to me, that suppports the non-Studebaker theory. It is obviosly a '67 Chevy design. I like the Chevelle body line on the forward front fender. It is signed by Bradley and dated 8/65. He had been with GM since '62.
Attached Images
 
__________________
'69 Chev Cust/10 swb, 350/700R4, 5"/6"
'70 Chev C10 swb, 67 front, 454/700r4, 4"/5"
'73 Chev stepper, 350/3 spd
'84 Chev K20 350/4 spd
'91 GMC 1500 Suburban 4x4, 350/700R4
billogna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 12:42 PM   #15
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
I owned a beautiful 64Studebaker for a time. I also belonged to the Studebaker News Group, which tends to be a very proud gorup that feels like the Studebaker has always been an over looked performance car. I remember when this came up before, I asked this question on the newsgroup. Everyone over there said it was non-sense.

Look at todays cars. There are a lot more similarities in designing than there was between the Stude and the Chevy Truck.

Here is a picture of my old Stude I should have kept that one.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 12:45 PM   #16
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
By the way, in 1966 Studebaker had a skeleton crew of designers on staff, and was finding it hard to make designing changes to a "old" body style that had been around since the 50's. They carried the body style on as long as they could because of the lack of $$$ I doubt GM would have looked to Studebaker for some "fresh" ideas.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 04:15 PM   #17
toms68cst
Registered User
 
toms68cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 4,296
I remember that post by Ryan68. I think he posted a picture of a custom studebaker truck that had a 67-like chevy grill on it and posted the message as a joke. I even fell for it at first!

Bradley worked for GM through the 60's. I think he left GM around 68-69 to start making Hot Wheels. I don't think he had any ties to Studebaker. You could perhaps argue that some of the late Studebaker truck grills look similar to the 67-68 grills.
__________________
Unrestored 68 C-10 CST. Original 327. 4-Speed CH465. 50k or so miles.

TREASURER, Drum Brake Club.
toms68cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 08:57 PM   #18
Fast68Chevy
Account Suspended
 
Fast68Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: IL
Posts: 0
the hood design change in 69 was in the article ??

anyone got copy of it ? i was around here when all the harry Bradley interview things were happening, and had information saved from that time, but have since lost it all, gotta love puters and unreliability of them..

thanks
Fast68Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2002, 10:47 PM   #19
PICKMUP
"Trucks with Class"
 
PICKMUP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: OLYMPIA, WA, USA
Posts: 8,158
The start of a new "Urban Legand"!

It has to be true. I read/saw/heard about it on the INTERNET! Right?
__________________
Email: frankeham@comcast.net
Phone: 360-956-7170
PICKMUP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2002, 12:49 AM   #20
billogna
Registered User
 
billogna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Choctaw, OK
Posts: 235
Fast68Chevy, I have the magazine pages scanned and will email the article to you if you want it.
__________________
'69 Chev Cust/10 swb, 350/700R4, 5"/6"
'70 Chev C10 swb, 67 front, 454/700r4, 4"/5"
'73 Chev stepper, 350/3 spd
'84 Chev K20 350/4 spd
'91 GMC 1500 Suburban 4x4, 350/700R4
billogna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2002, 08:52 AM   #21
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
Harry Bradley is the designer of the '67, just like billogna said. The article is very informative and explains why the changes and the thinking that went into the new design.

As for Studebaker engines for '65-66, which were built in Canada don' cha know, they had steel crankshafts (yep, forged) in the 283's. So, if you can find one in good condition you could have the basis for a nice 302 to build....if you can find a good builder 4-inch bore block, with small main journals.

Does anyone know if the Checker engines had steel cranks? They also used Chevy engines toward the end of their production. Just curious. The last Checker I saw was on Friends....Phoebe was driving it to the beach house where one of them got stung by a jelly fish and Joey peed on the sting.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com