|
04-14-2010, 10:43 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,728
|
Ride height
How many of you like the stock spring height better than lowered. I like them both ways myself but I want to put mine back stock. I will be using mine to haul heavy loads from time to time and as it is now it will drag bottom with anything heavy or with a trailer behind it.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 10:53 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
|
Re: Ride height
You could do air bags or helper bags rear and keep it lowered. No compressor onboard needed. Just fill them as needed with an external compressor
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc |
|
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 12:15 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Big Red - Now its a SWB!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oroville, Ca
Posts: 1,624
|
Re: Ride height
Quote:
Then you get the best of both worlds, show and go!
__________________
68 3/4 ton  (Project)-350 Small Block, .030 over, 10:1 comp, 3998993 heads, C3BX edelbrock intake, comp cams XE268, Holley 670 SA, long tube headers, dual flow 40's, E-fan, Alum rad, currently under the knife getting shortened and bagged  build thread41 3/4 ton (wife's)-flatbed, fully restored to original01 Tahoe LT 4WD (my daily driver)-Magnaflow Muffler, Rollin on 22's 02 Ford Mustang Convertable (Wife's Car)-Flowmaster 50, Clear corners, Intake, sittin on 18's |
|
|
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 07:44 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,375
|
Re: Ride height
I would also have to agree that air bags would be the best of both worlds...
__________________
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please!!!!!. Sylvester's build thread >>>http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ht=big+rebuild |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
