The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2010, 08:07 PM   #1
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
drop member vs cupped lca

first off, i love this site. long time lurker here, first time poster.

and just so you know ive been doing alot of searching and just cant seem to find an answer. whats the advantage of having a DM vs cupping the lca (with a drop spindle too of course)? it seems that everyone loves their DM's but theyre just so dang expensive and ALOT of work to install (engine and trans removal + frame notch for rack). and from what i can see the cupped lca are cheap and yield tons of drop. and i do have the fab skills reqd for cupping my own lca.
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 08:18 PM   #2
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by wannagettachevy View Post
first off, i love this site. long time lurker here, first time poster.

and just so you know ive been doing alot of searching and just cant seem to find an answer. whats the advantage of having a DM vs cupping the lca (with a drop spindle too of course)? it seems that everyone loves their DM's but theyre just so dang expensive and ALOT of work to install (engine and trans removal + frame notch for rack). and from what i can see the cupped lca are cheap and yield tons of drop. and i do have the fab skills reqd for cupping my own lca.


Cupping will only get you so far, even with cupping you will lay on your crossmember or lower arms hard. Only reasonable way to lay frame is to Dropmember, Section stock, or Z the frame.

If you don't wanna lay out, you don't need a DM or the other mods.

Also, it is not absolutely necessary to remove the motor tranny to install a member, just raise it and support it. Its been done that way by a few people.

Last edited by Ghostwhite; 06-23-2010 at 08:21 PM.
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 08:20 PM   #3
DKN
Active Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angles CA
Posts: 136
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Cupped arms will have less ground clearance. You have to take the bottom of the arm and relocate it even lower. Drop springs do the same thing with more ground clearance. CPP tubular lower arms will get you more ground clearance so that the lowest point becomes the crossmember. The drop members do several different things, one of them is to raise the crossmember for even more ground clearance. The more ground clearance you get the lower you can run the truck.

Danny Nix
CPP

Last edited by DKN; 06-23-2010 at 08:21 PM.
DKN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 08:36 PM   #4
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by DKN View Post
Cupped arms will have less ground clearance. You have to take the bottom of the arm and relocate it even lower. Drop springs do the same thing with more ground clearance. CPP tubular lower arms will get you more ground clearance so that the lowest point becomes the crossmember. The drop members do several different things, one of them is to raise the crossmember for even more ground clearance. The more ground clearance you get the lower you can run the truck.

Danny Nix
CPP
All good points I missed
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:07 PM   #5
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

wow, well i appreciate the quick and helpful response. so a dm will make the frame the lowest point on the truck? whereas a bags, cupped lca, and drop spindles will make it lay the crossmember?
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:13 PM   #6
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

What year is the truck? Give us a little bit more info and we will get you a sure answer.

Last edited by Ghostwhite; 06-23-2010 at 09:14 PM.
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:19 PM   #7
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostwhite View Post
What year is the truck? Give us a little bit more info and we will get you a sure answer.
i dont own a chevy yet but ill have one very soon, ive been saving since i found this site 2 years ago. im looking at buying my buddys 69 lwb.
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:26 PM   #8
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

60-62 has an X frame chassis and is just messy for laying out(ask me how I know). The 63-72 has a conventional ladder style frame and is a lot easier to deal with. With a Dropmember, the lowest point would be the frame.

Without a DM, sectioned stock cross member or Z'd frame the cross member and/or A arms will be the lowest point.

Last edited by Ghostwhite; 06-23-2010 at 09:26 PM.
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:38 PM   #9
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostwhite View Post
60-62 has an X frame chassis and is just messy for laying out(ask me how I know). The 63-72 has a conventional ladder style frame and is a lot easier to deal with. With a Dropmember, the lowest point would be the frame.

Without a DM, sectioned stock cross member or Z'd frame the cross member and/or A arms will be the lowest point.
ok, another question for you Ghost. a sectioned xmember is a where its made thinner so it can be moved up in the frame rails towards the motor and therefore farther from the ground? its looking more like a Z is going to be my method for laying frame.
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:46 PM   #10
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Here are some discussions on the issues with sectioned crossmembers.
Problems with Crossmember

I am trying to find the how to on this, I will keep looking
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:50 PM   #11
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

here is some pics






Last edited by Ghostwhite; 06-23-2010 at 09:50 PM.
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 09:52 PM   #12
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

And finally, here is a write-up

Captkaos's Chopped Crossmember
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 05:03 PM   #13
DKN
Active Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angles CA
Posts: 136
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Great pics. You can see where the arm around the bushings is the lowest point. The CPP Tubular arms use a different bushing so the cross member will be the lowest poit.

Cupped arms will make the portion of the arm near the spring be even lower than the area at the bushing.

These pics show the advantages to tubular arms. We have done several installs where the original arms have been damadged around the spring and bushing areas because they hit the ground when driving a lowered truck.

Danny Nix
CPP
DKN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 01:34 AM   #14
54Caddy
GM Addicted
 
54Caddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 2,294
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Pictures off these arms you keep mentioning would be a plus, Need to see them installed or it never happened.
__________________
..Mac’s Garage..
73 GMC, 54 Caddy, 2010 Silverado, 68 C10 RIP DAd

My 73 GMC Truck Build Pic
2010 Silverado 4/6 on 24s

IG:MacsGarage
54Caddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 08:22 AM   #15
panhandler62
Java Mechanic
 
panhandler62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 6,763
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Something not mentioned above ---

If you use the DM you will be installing a new front suspension that is desined to run at those heights instead of making changes to the stock suspension to colapse it to those heights so you will run into a lot less problems getting the geometry right.
__________________
Keith
11 Lincoln MKT -- Momma's wagon
13 G37xS -- middle age crazy car
68 C20 Fleetside -- RIP
Decorating the whole town up at a cost of $27 ....
panhandler62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 01:23 PM   #16
texastrendz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 1,161
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

i had the lower control arms on my truck cupped, it looked good parked. do not drive it low. i hung mine on a man hole cover and bent the frame. totalled now. had to start from scratch again. now i have the world famous drop member. spend the money, if you are wanting to drive it low. broke my heart with all the time and money i had into it. the two grand for the complete drop member would of saved me ten grand.
texastrendz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 02:07 PM   #17
dv8customs
Registered User
 
dv8customs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,047
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Usually when you cup the factory arms the cup does not sit lower than the bottom of the control arm.
dv8customs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 02:14 PM   #18
nastyc10
Registered User
 
nastyc10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 516
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

dropmember also narrows track width for tire clearance when running low. The added space is nice when turning.
nastyc10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 03:37 PM   #19
dv8customs
Registered User
 
dv8customs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,047
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by nastyc10 View Post
dropmember also narrows track width for tire clearance when running low. The added space is nice when turning.
This alone is a good reason to go with an aftermarket unit.

Last edited by dv8customs; 06-25-2010 at 03:37 PM.
dv8customs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 03:54 PM   #20
Ghostwhite
Squarebody guy
 
Ghostwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 335
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Yeah, after a year or so of thinking about it and months of serious consideration I decided to go the Dropmember route. With all the benefits of proper clearances and geometry, it is a major upgrade as far as lowering is concerned. There are quite a few threads on this that we can dig up if you are more interested.

Not trying to jam it down you're throat either haha just sayin.
Ghostwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 05:06 PM   #21
Hottrucks
Redefining LowBudget
 
Hottrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: lebanon Cow Hampshire
Posts: 4,538
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

ok heres the best and cheapest way to get the low down

cup your stock LCA then add a 3" drop spindle....

ok heres why....the cup will get your X memeber 1.5 " off the ground and put your stock 29" tire against the inner fender support.....A 3" drop spindle will lay out the X with 1.5" to spare whick means that at ride height your A arms And bags will be in there working range along with keeping your steering inline...the downs side is that your tires have no place to go without a hood hinge, heater box and inner fender mod

If you want to get lower your going to have to do the X member done or buy one
__________________
1970 C10 CST fleetside 472 ....big dreams little cash...
SunShine Syndicate..

Mikes Sandwich Fair Run OCT 8th 2011
Hottrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 02:37 PM   #22
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hottrucks View Post
ok heres the best and cheapest way to get the low down

cup your stock LCA then add a 3" drop spindle....

ok heres why....the cup will get your X memeber 1.5 " off the ground and put your stock 29" tire against the inner fender support.....A 3" drop spindle will lay out the X with 1.5" to spare whick means that at ride height your A arms And bags will be in there working range along with keeping your steering inline...the downs side is that your tires have no place to go without a hood hinge, heater box and inner fender mod

If you want to get lower your going to have to do the X member done or buy one
thats exactly what i wanted to hear.
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 02:39 PM   #23
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by texastrendz View Post
i had the lower control arms on my truck cupped, it looked good parked. do not drive it low. i hung mine on a man hole cover and bent the frame. totalled now. had to start from scratch again. now i have the world famous drop member. spend the money, if you are wanting to drive it low. broke my heart with all the time and money i had into it. the two grand for the complete drop member would of saved me ten grand.


wow, scary. not good.
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 02:55 PM   #24
wannagettachevy
Registered User
 
wannagettachevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 72
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostwhite View Post
Yeah, after a year or so of thinking about it and months of serious consideration I decided to go the Dropmember route. With all the benefits of proper clearances and geometry, it is a major upgrade as far as lowering is concerned. There are quite a few threads on this that we can dig up if you are more interested.

Not trying to jam it down you're throat either haha just sayin.
ok so lets say i am going to put in a DM. will my factory suspension components w/ bags bolt on to it? end of story? and im sure theres a thread here somewhere that will tell me what i need with a dm, but i figured ide just ask. im sure someone has a quick easy answer.
wannagettachevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 03:09 PM   #25
Hottrucks
Redefining LowBudget
 
Hottrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: lebanon Cow Hampshire
Posts: 4,538
Re: drop member vs cupped lca

a drop memeber is just that...if you want cupped lowers or bag arms plan on spending some more $$$$ you would at least need bag cups ( which can be had cheap.. I have a set laying around) but to spend $$ for a drop and not do the rest is a waste..you might as well just buy spndles and save yourself a ton of work and $$..I mean all your going to get is about 2" of drop and have to notch the frame for steering and .........
__________________
1970 C10 CST fleetside 472 ....big dreams little cash...
SunShine Syndicate..

Mikes Sandwich Fair Run OCT 8th 2011
Hottrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com