Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-06-2010, 06:30 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: stigler, oklahoma
Posts: 190
|
what's wrong with 305's
It seems a lot of people don't like 305 I don't understand why. What's wrong with them I have one in my truck and it runs great. It does everything I need it to do and its got way more power then the v6 I'm driving right now.
__________________
71 c10 with a 305. new dd wohoo 1956 chevy bel air hard top with a 327. 1998 honda passport V6 old dd. |
07-06-2010, 06:34 PM | #2 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,249
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
Nothing really in my opinion. If you have one they work just fine, just not as powerful as 350. Most though will take the 350, because for minimal cash difference you get a big difference in power/torque, as well as the build up possibilities.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
07-06-2010, 06:37 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 2,436
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
I am not sure why people don't like the 305 myself. A lot of them were sold and seemed to work ok.
I think people like the 350 better because there are more performance parts for them and the price is not too bad.
__________________
'67 Chevy C-20 short stepper - build complete, 454/SM-465. '75 C-30 Single Cab DRW-350 small block/NP-435. '77 GMC-6500 Dump Truck, 427 Tall Deck. '92 GMC K-3500 Duallie, 454/4L80E. |
07-06-2010, 06:49 PM | #4 | |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
Nothing wrong with a 305, in stock form. I just wouldn't put any money into one, like rebuilding, etc. Minor things like intake, headers, are ok, because they will work on the 350 if you go that way later....
The point being that when you do spend some money, do it on a better foundation.
__________________
You can review the site's rules here. Quote:
Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part.... The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right. |
|
07-06-2010, 07:01 PM | #5 |
optomistic ah-so
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 544
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
As an engine by itself, it's fine--but nearly nothing can be upgraded really using parts available for performance applications. the intake and exhaust ports in 305 heads are too small to take advantage of most 327- or 350-intended parts. Changing heads exposes how small the bore size is. the list goes on.
If you have one and are just looking to drive or pull shop truck duty, you're fine--I have one right now and I complain about the mish-mash of those same other-engine parts that the PO threw on, not the engine itself. Still, I wouldn't use one for making real power. And you definitely are right about being better off with it than with a V6.
__________________
Rubbing is Racin' Ribbing is Bench Racin' 1970 C-10 lwb Fleetside. Originally 350 2-bbl 3-on-the-tree, m/b, m/w, m/s no a/c. Currently running on a '76 Camaro 305. |
07-06-2010, 09:55 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
I agree completely with the previous posts. It's a perfectly good engine if you just keep your hands off of it and leave it stock. I have had one in my parts chaser for about 10 years now with absolutely zero problems.
Ray Last edited by raycow; 07-06-2010 at 09:56 PM. |
07-06-2010, 10:18 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Parachute, CO
Posts: 183
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
I ran a rebuilt one for years in a few wheelers.Swapped on a 4bbl a little bigger cam and ran it.Had enough power to turn 33"ers on slickrock in Moab in a locked up Suburban.Moved the drivetrain to a '73 blazer and upped to 36"ers.Still no problem and would cruise I-70 at 80mph all day.
__________________
1984 1ton 4x4 crew cab dually 6.2 diesel,465,205,D60,D70,1987 3/4ton 4x4 suburban 5.7 FI350,TH400,208,1985 CJ-7 FI406,465,205,D60,FF14, 1970 Jeepster 350,465,205,D44,FF14, |
07-06-2010, 10:26 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: stigler, oklahoma
Posts: 190
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
Thanks for your thoughts guys and ya I'm not going to mess with it. It runs fine without anything and I agree with yall about them being good but I always hear people saying there crap.
__________________
71 c10 with a 305. new dd wohoo 1956 chevy bel air hard top with a 327. 1998 honda passport V6 old dd. |
07-06-2010, 11:33 PM | #9 |
Cruzin
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
nothing wrong with them, the best motor i have ever had was a 305 ho still running good today, it always got me home lol
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8 Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U Proverbs 3:5,6 "Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you. Danica Grace 6/26/14
|
07-07-2010, 10:23 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 255
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
I have one in my 71 C20 and it does fine. I've pulled more than the trucks rated GVWR. Before it was given to me, my grilfriend's cousin tried to burn the tires off of it. The trans went out and the rear end blew, (that's why they gave it to me) but the engine still survived.
There's a recent article in the July 2010 issue of Super Chevy magazine where they got 362hp and 353lb-ft out of one. (I've seen some magazines be a little generous when it comes to power figures) I don't think a 305 would be a good truck engine at that level though. Looks like Trick Flow is making a head just for the small bore Chevys. http://www.trickflow.com/egnsearch.a...=KeywordSearch |
07-07-2010, 03:19 PM | #11 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,183
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
In one word: Everything.
|
07-07-2010, 03:55 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: fairfield IL
Posts: 78
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
|
07-07-2010, 04:03 PM | #13 |
Truck and auto performance nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
its comparable to the days of the 307...another "get by" motor that takes up the same mass as one with double (or even triple) the hp.
Smaller c.i. motors can make good power...but bigger IS better. :LOL:
__________________
Kurt - '68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy '72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close '06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD '18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver '95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto... my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken |
07-07-2010, 09:50 PM | #14 |
Kill Bill...et
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Winchestertonfieldville, Wa
Posts: 366
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
But if it runs, goes up hill, downhill, forward and reverse....then nothing. Really, did you buy an old farmers run-about to drive it like a Camaro?
|
07-07-2010, 10:16 PM | #15 |
Cruzin
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
i have 350s, 305s both are good motors the 305 did what it was made to do, and i will always love them will build one someday even if it is not the economical, or smartest thing to do. but my first love is the inline 6 and i put a 350 in my 71 a couple years ago i like power too but i'm having thoughts sometimes about putting that inline 6 back in for the cool factor and because i miss it. OK I'M DONE and its good to be different
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8 Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U Proverbs 3:5,6 "Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you. Danica Grace 6/26/14
Last edited by Hubscrub; 07-07-2010 at 10:38 PM. Reason: added a thought |
07-07-2010, 10:25 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: stoddard nh
Posts: 693
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
nothing i think their great i had one in my 77 2 dr impala i put a 3.75 stroke crank in it, bought some summit rods, did some head work, cam, headers and intake. had 9.25:1 comp 93 octane i was able to hold my own with 90% of the other people out their. and surprised all 100% of them as the 305 reputation lead to some surprises when i revealed the motor. i would not trade that motor for anything.
however yes a 350 will always make more power per dollar. CI=power. |
07-07-2010, 10:33 PM | #17 |
yes, i do
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, wa
Posts: 2,734
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
not a damn thing i think. yeah they don't have the power of a good ole 350, but you can get them in running condition really cheap off CL
__________________
ERROR 404....... SNAPPY COMEBACK NOT FOUND _______________________________________________________________________________________________ -60 Chevy C10, dead 350/good th350 combo, sitting on a 76 c10 blazer frame, built from 11 different vehicles "the abomination" -07 gmt900 silverado 1500 lt xcab z71, granite blue -81 suzuki gs650g "shelah"- current project -81 kz1000m1 csr "sarge" -next project (just beautification) -07 kawasaki vulcan classic vn900 |
07-07-2010, 10:42 PM | #18 |
Who's got steelies?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
The 305 is really a great engine. I ran one for 5 years in my truck, and it never gave up or gave out. Maybe its the smaller bore size (3.75" vs 4.0") than a 350, but they seem to wear a lot longer. I'd rebuild one.
__________________
1969 C10 LWB W/ 250 I6 & 3spd 1970 C10 with '67 small window cab, 68 front end, blue; 305/TH350, 3.08 limited slip rear end, manual brakes, power steering; & 4-wheel drums-My daily driver. 1975 Chevelle Malibu Classic Coupe 350/th350 mint green 1970 C20 Suburban 350/700R4 4.10 gearing green & white 1978 Big 10 Silverado 350/th350, working ac, 2 tone blue-My summer daily driver 1983 GMC 1500 Sierra 305/SM465 2.73 rear end How to add a trip odometer to your 67-72 stock speedometer How to rebuild your Q-Jet My Truck Page My Youtube Channel |
07-07-2010, 10:52 PM | #19 |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
I had one in my 86 Z28. Other than it being a complete joke that it was even in a "Z28" it was a good running motor. I got about 15mpg running around town and 21 highway (the car had a 700R4). Not bad for a V8 car. I would never put one in my truck (for all the reasons above) but if I ever bought a truck with a good running 305 already in it, I'd probably leave it alone.
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! Last edited by 67ChevyRedneck; 07-07-2010 at 10:53 PM. |
07-08-2010, 08:05 AM | #20 |
BOHICA
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stewartville, MN
Posts: 440
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
nothing wrong with a 305 or a 307 for that matter. They just got a lot of crap from people who think bigger is always better. If you don't want to burn tires or drag race, all a bigger engine will get you is bigger gas bills. A 305 and a 350 will both pull your truck down the highway at 65 mph. If your just cruizin' it really doesn't matter. Dollar for dollar a 350 is cheaper and easier to upgrade or rebuild though.
__________________
Trying to save someone from their own stupidity is like teaching a pig to dance. It is a waste of your time, and it annoys the pig! |
07-08-2010, 09:00 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atoka, TN
Posts: 240
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
dont know that much about the 305 havent ever messed with one however i have do disagree with the comment on the 307. that was a great moter and you could really get those things through out some power.
__________________
Mark 1968 C-10 SWB 307/munci 4spd/411possi 1986-1990 1972 Cheyenne-10 LWB 350/TH350 IF SHE WHOULD HAVE KEEPT THE SHIRT ON THEY WOULDNT HAVE BROKEN UP THANKS ADAM SANDLER U. S. Navy Seabee "CAN DO", "The difficult we do at once. The impossible may take a little bit longer.","We Build We Fight", "Work Hard Play Hard" |
07-09-2010, 03:35 AM | #22 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aurora,Il ..born,raised and still live in the same house
Posts: 286
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
Quote:
One of the most dependable motors i ever had was a 305 in a 78 caprice! It started everytime,never gave me problems,was decent on gas and never ran hot! For any young guy out there that wants to learn how to rebuild or even re-ring a motor,pick up one on craigslist for a hundred or two hundred and have fun with it. It still amazes me that people get all excited about 283's and talk about em like they are so great while the poor ole 305 gets no respect. We ALL know that a 350 is buildable and better than a 305,but the 305 is a good little motor and will get you where you want to go.
__________________
I love stock! Not really into the whole bagged, squished,chopped, drooped,cut, bent,lifted,twisted,split,decked,massaged,tubbed,jacked trend. (o.k. slightly lowered is fine) For the love of god, just drive it before you forget what the truck is supposed to look like !....LOL Last edited by beebster; 07-09-2010 at 03:41 AM. |
|
07-09-2010, 10:20 AM | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atoka, TN
Posts: 240
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
Quote:
__________________
Mark 1968 C-10 SWB 307/munci 4spd/411possi 1986-1990 1972 Cheyenne-10 LWB 350/TH350 IF SHE WHOULD HAVE KEEPT THE SHIRT ON THEY WOULDNT HAVE BROKEN UP THANKS ADAM SANDLER U. S. Navy Seabee "CAN DO", "The difficult we do at once. The impossible may take a little bit longer.","We Build We Fight", "Work Hard Play Hard" |
|
07-09-2010, 02:29 PM | #24 |
Truck and auto performance nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
a 307 from the factory...was no "hot rod" motor. Most (if not all) came with a 2bbl. carb. HP ratings ranged from like 115hp -200hp....in days of 300+hp small blocks. They were built to fill a void as they had more torque then a 6cyl.
just because somebody had one and/or people said it was "really fast" (which is an opinion based on a persons known comparables) doesn't mean squat... I had a brand new '78 305ci Camaro LT and at 17yrs old and sure...I thought it was "fast". Compare it to todays cars....or even yesterdays hotrods and it was sssslllloooowwwwwww..... look it up.... Chevrolet_small-block_engine or how about all (1st thru 4th gen) the Camaro motors.... http://www.enginefactory.com/Camaro_FirstGen.htm It was a product of the times. If you needed a motor with more torque then a 6cyl but you want to keep it small...you got a 307...or later a 305. But then again, at one time and in a day of 4.3L V8's....a 305 was about as big a small block as you could get.
__________________
Kurt - '68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy '72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close '06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD '18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver '95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto... my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken |
07-09-2010, 07:27 PM | #25 |
Kid's Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 8,241
|
Re: what's wrong with 305's
I wish you gentlemen would just drop all this 305 talk,I have bought two of them and ready to do a 3rd for my plow truck.150 bucks is the most I have spent because "It's just a 305 and not worth much" Thats the best kept secret around these parts!
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|