The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2010, 06:30 PM   #1
white71chevy
Registered User
 
white71chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: stigler, oklahoma
Posts: 190
what's wrong with 305's

It seems a lot of people don't like 305 I don't understand why. What's wrong with them I have one in my truck and it runs great. It does everything I need it to do and its got way more power then the v6 I'm driving right now.
__________________
71 c10 with a 305. new dd wohoo
1956 chevy bel air hard top with a 327.
1998 honda passport V6 old dd.
white71chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 06:34 PM   #2
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,249
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Nothing really in my opinion. If you have one they work just fine, just not as powerful as 350. Most though will take the 350, because for minimal cash difference you get a big difference in power/torque, as well as the build up possibilities.
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 06:37 PM   #3
Shyguy
Junior Member
 
Shyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 2,436
Re: what's wrong with 305's

I am not sure why people don't like the 305 myself. A lot of them were sold and seemed to work ok.

I think people like the 350 better because there are more performance parts for them and the price is not too bad.
__________________
'67 Chevy C-20 short stepper - build complete, 454/SM-465.
'75 C-30 Single Cab DRW-350 small block/NP-435.
'77 GMC-6500 Dump Truck, 427 Tall Deck.
'92 GMC K-3500 Duallie, 454/4L80E.
Shyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 06:49 PM   #4
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Nothing wrong with a 305, in stock form. I just wouldn't put any money into one, like rebuilding, etc. Minor things like intake, headers, are ok, because they will work on the 350 if you go that way later....
The point being that when you do spend some money, do it on a better foundation.
__________________
You can review the site's rules here.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
As for reading directions...
The directions are nothing but another man's opinion.
Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself...

Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part....

The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right.
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 07:01 PM   #5
CSGAS
optomistic ah-so
 
CSGAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 544
Re: what's wrong with 305's

As an engine by itself, it's fine--but nearly nothing can be upgraded really using parts available for performance applications. the intake and exhaust ports in 305 heads are too small to take advantage of most 327- or 350-intended parts. Changing heads exposes how small the bore size is. the list goes on.

If you have one and are just looking to drive or pull shop truck duty, you're fine--I have one right now and I complain about the mish-mash of those same other-engine parts that the PO threw on, not the engine itself. Still, I wouldn't use one for making real power. And you definitely are right about being better off with it than with a V6.
__________________
Rubbing is Racin'
Ribbing is Bench Racin'


1970 C-10 lwb Fleetside. Originally 350 2-bbl 3-on-the-tree, m/b, m/w, m/s no a/c. Currently running on a '76 Camaro 305.
CSGAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 09:55 PM   #6
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: what's wrong with 305's

I agree completely with the previous posts. It's a perfectly good engine if you just keep your hands off of it and leave it stock. I have had one in my parts chaser for about 10 years now with absolutely zero problems.

Ray

Last edited by raycow; 07-06-2010 at 09:56 PM.
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:18 PM   #7
cheepin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Parachute, CO
Posts: 183
Re: what's wrong with 305's

I ran a rebuilt one for years in a few wheelers.Swapped on a 4bbl a little bigger cam and ran it.Had enough power to turn 33"ers on slickrock in Moab in a locked up Suburban.Moved the drivetrain to a '73 blazer and upped to 36"ers.Still no problem and would cruise I-70 at 80mph all day.
__________________
1984 1ton 4x4 crew cab dually 6.2 diesel,465,205,D60,D70,1987 3/4ton 4x4 suburban 5.7 FI350,TH400,208,1985 CJ-7 FI406,465,205,D60,FF14, 1970 Jeepster 350,465,205,D44,FF14,
cheepin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:26 PM   #8
white71chevy
Registered User
 
white71chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: stigler, oklahoma
Posts: 190
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Thanks for your thoughts guys and ya I'm not going to mess with it. It runs fine without anything and I agree with yall about them being good but I always hear people saying there crap.
__________________
71 c10 with a 305. new dd wohoo
1956 chevy bel air hard top with a 327.
1998 honda passport V6 old dd.
white71chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 11:33 PM   #9
Hubscrub
Cruzin
 
Hubscrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
Re: what's wrong with 305's

nothing wrong with them, the best motor i have ever had was a 305 ho still running good today, it always got me home lol
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8

Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U

Proverbs 3:5,6

"Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt

In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you.
Danica Grace 6/26/14
Hubscrub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:23 AM   #10
silverstreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 255
Re: what's wrong with 305's

I have one in my 71 C20 and it does fine. I've pulled more than the trucks rated GVWR. Before it was given to me, my grilfriend's cousin tried to burn the tires off of it. The trans went out and the rear end blew, (that's why they gave it to me) but the engine still survived.

There's a recent article in the July 2010 issue of Super Chevy magazine where they got 362hp and 353lb-ft out of one. (I've seen some magazines be a little generous when it comes to power figures) I don't think a 305 would be a good truck engine at that level though.

Looks like Trick Flow is making a head just for the small bore Chevys.
http://www.trickflow.com/egnsearch.a...=KeywordSearch
silverstreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:19 PM   #11
Fitz
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,183
Re: what's wrong with 305's

In one word: Everything.
Fitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:55 PM   #12
btullis99
Registered User
 
btullis99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: fairfield IL
Posts: 78
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz View Post
In one word: Everything.
x2

take the heads off a 305 and look at those tiny pistons. anyone who ever 'builds" a 305 needs to reevaluate. spend the same money on a 350 and end up with a better engine.
btullis99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 04:03 PM   #13
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: what's wrong with 305's

its comparable to the days of the 307...another "get by" motor that takes up the same mass as one with double (or even triple) the hp.

Smaller c.i. motors can make good power...but bigger IS better. :LOL:
__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 09:50 PM   #14
stevencvn72
Kill Bill...et
 
stevencvn72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Winchestertonfieldville, Wa
Posts: 366
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz View Post
In one word: Everything.
But if it runs, goes up hill, downhill, forward and reverse....then nothing. Really, did you buy an old farmers run-about to drive it like a Camaro?
__________________
-Steve

I Grease

'67 Chev stepper

http://youtu.be/38p_2Iu2fd0
stevencvn72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:16 PM   #15
Hubscrub
Cruzin
 
Hubscrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevencvn72 View Post
But if it runs, goes up hill, downhill, forward and reverse....then nothing. Really, did you buy an old farmers run-about to drive it like a Camaro?
i have 350s, 305s both are good motors the 305 did what it was made to do, and i will always love them will build one someday even if it is not the economical, or smartest thing to do. but my first love is the inline 6 and i put a 350 in my 71 a couple years ago i like power too but i'm having thoughts sometimes about putting that inline 6 back in for the cool factor and because i miss it. OK I'M DONE and its good to be different
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8

Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U

Proverbs 3:5,6

"Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt

In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you.
Danica Grace 6/26/14

Last edited by Hubscrub; 07-07-2010 at 10:38 PM. Reason: added a thought
Hubscrub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:25 PM   #16
292farmer
Registered User
 
292farmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: stoddard nh
Posts: 693
Re: what's wrong with 305's

nothing i think their great i had one in my 77 2 dr impala i put a 3.75 stroke crank in it, bought some summit rods, did some head work, cam, headers and intake. had 9.25:1 comp 93 octane i was able to hold my own with 90% of the other people out their. and surprised all 100% of them as the 305 reputation lead to some surprises when i revealed the motor. i would not trade that motor for anything.
however yes a 350 will always make more power per dollar. CI=power.
292farmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:33 PM   #17
60ratrod
yes, i do
 
60ratrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, wa
Posts: 2,734
Re: what's wrong with 305's

not a damn thing i think. yeah they don't have the power of a good ole 350, but you can get them in running condition really cheap off CL
__________________
ERROR 404....... SNAPPY COMEBACK NOT FOUND
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

-60 Chevy C10, dead 350/good th350 combo, sitting on a 76 c10 blazer frame, built from 11 different vehicles "the abomination"
-07 gmt900 silverado 1500 lt xcab z71, granite blue
-81 suzuki gs650g "shelah"- current project
-81 kz1000m1 csr "sarge" -next project (just beautification)
-07 kawasaki vulcan classic vn900
60ratrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:42 PM   #18
oldgold70c10
Who's got steelies?
 
oldgold70c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,025
Re: what's wrong with 305's

The 305 is really a great engine. I ran one for 5 years in my truck, and it never gave up or gave out. Maybe its the smaller bore size (3.75" vs 4.0") than a 350, but they seem to wear a lot longer. I'd rebuild one.
__________________
1969 C10 LWB W/ 250 I6 & 3spd
1970 C10 with '67 small window cab, 68 front end, blue; 305/TH350, 3.08 limited slip rear end, manual brakes, power steering; & 4-wheel drums-My daily driver.
1975 Chevelle Malibu Classic Coupe 350/th350 mint green
1970 C20 Suburban 350/700R4 4.10 gearing green & white
1978 Big 10 Silverado 350/th350, working ac, 2 tone blue-My summer daily driver
1983 GMC 1500 Sierra 305/SM465 2.73 rear end

How to add a trip odometer to your 67-72 stock speedometer

How to rebuild your Q-Jet

My Truck Page
My Youtube Channel
oldgold70c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:52 PM   #19
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: what's wrong with 305's

I had one in my 86 Z28. Other than it being a complete joke that it was even in a "Z28" it was a good running motor. I got about 15mpg running around town and 21 highway (the car had a 700R4). Not bad for a V8 car. I would never put one in my truck (for all the reasons above) but if I ever bought a truck with a good running 305 already in it, I'd probably leave it alone.
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!

Last edited by 67ChevyRedneck; 07-07-2010 at 10:53 PM.
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 08:05 AM   #20
BluTrukker
BOHICA
 
BluTrukker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stewartville, MN
Posts: 440
Re: what's wrong with 305's

nothing wrong with a 305 or a 307 for that matter. They just got a lot of crap from people who think bigger is always better. If you don't want to burn tires or drag race, all a bigger engine will get you is bigger gas bills. A 305 and a 350 will both pull your truck down the highway at 65 mph. If your just cruizin' it really doesn't matter. Dollar for dollar a 350 is cheaper and easier to upgrade or rebuild though.
__________________
Trying to save someone from their own stupidity is like teaching a pig to dance. It is a waste of your time, and it annoys the pig!
BluTrukker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 09:00 AM   #21
marks1972
Registered User
 
marks1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atoka, TN
Posts: 240
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68GMCCustom View Post
its comparable to the days of the 307...another "get by" motor that takes up the same mass as one with double (or even triple) the hp.

Smaller c.i. motors can make good power...but bigger IS better. :LOL:
dont know that much about the 305 havent ever messed with one however i have do disagree with the comment on the 307. that was a great moter and you could really get those things through out some power.
__________________
Mark
1968 C-10 SWB 307/munci 4spd/411possi 1986-1990
1972 Cheyenne-10 LWB 350/TH350
IF SHE WHOULD HAVE KEEPT THE SHIRT ON THEY WOULDNT HAVE BROKEN UP THANKS ADAM SANDLER
U. S. Navy Seabee
"CAN DO", "The difficult we do at once. The impossible may take a little bit longer.","We Build We Fight", "Work Hard Play Hard"
marks1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 03:35 AM   #22
beebster
Registered User
 
beebster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aurora,Il ..born,raised and still live in the same house
Posts: 286
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hubscrub View Post
i have 350s, 305s both are good motors the 305 did what it was made to do, and i will always love them will build one someday even if it is not the economical, or smartest thing to do. but my first love is the inline 6 and i put a 350 in my 71 a couple years ago i like power too but i'm having thoughts sometimes about putting that inline 6 back in for the cool factor and because i miss it. OK I'M DONE and its good to be different
I agree with your comment. A nice little 305 can be a really dependable motor. as long as racing or a buildup isn't a big concern.
One of the most dependable motors i ever had was a 305 in a 78 caprice! It started everytime,never gave me problems,was decent on gas and never ran hot!
For any young guy out there that wants to learn how to rebuild or even re-ring a motor,pick up one on craigslist for a hundred or two hundred and have fun with it. It still amazes me that people get all excited about 283's and talk about em like they are so great while the poor ole 305 gets no respect.
We ALL know that a 350 is buildable and better than a 305,but the 305 is a good little motor and will get you where you want to go.
__________________
I love stock!
Not really into the whole bagged, squished,chopped, drooped,cut, bent,lifted,twisted,split,decked,massaged,tubbed,jacked trend. (o.k. slightly lowered is fine)
For the love of god, just drive it before you forget what the truck is supposed to look like !....LOL

Last edited by beebster; 07-09-2010 at 03:41 AM.
beebster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 10:20 AM   #23
marks1972
Registered User
 
marks1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atoka, TN
Posts: 240
Re: what's wrong with 305's

Quote:
Originally Posted by beebster;
I agree with your comment. A nice little 305 can be a really dependable motor. as long as racing or a buildup isn't a big concern.
One of the most dependable motors i ever had was a 305 in a 78 caprice! It started everytime,never gave me problems,was decent on gas and never ran hot!
For any young guy out there that wants to learn how to rebuild or even re-ring a motor,pick up one on craigslist for a hundred or two hundred and have fun with it. It still amazes me that people get all excited about 283's and talk about em like they are so great while the poor ole 305 gets no respect.
We ALL know that a 350 is buildable and better than a 305,but the 305 is a good little motor and will get you where you want to go.
I agree. Like I said before I don't know anything about the 305 but I do about the 307. It got the same bad rep just becose it is small yet everyone gets all excited and sweety palms talking about the 283's and the 327's and then they talk down the 307. They don't realize that a 307 is basicly a 283 block with a 327 crank and rods and 9 out of 10 times they had the 202 double hump heads on them.
__________________
Mark
1968 C-10 SWB 307/munci 4spd/411possi 1986-1990
1972 Cheyenne-10 LWB 350/TH350
IF SHE WHOULD HAVE KEEPT THE SHIRT ON THEY WOULDNT HAVE BROKEN UP THANKS ADAM SANDLER
U. S. Navy Seabee
"CAN DO", "The difficult we do at once. The impossible may take a little bit longer.","We Build We Fight", "Work Hard Play Hard"
marks1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 02:29 PM   #24
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: what's wrong with 305's

a 307 from the factory...was no "hot rod" motor. Most (if not all) came with a 2bbl. carb. HP ratings ranged from like 115hp -200hp....in days of 300+hp small blocks. They were built to fill a void as they had more torque then a 6cyl.


just because somebody had one and/or people said it was "really fast" (which is an opinion based on a persons known comparables) doesn't mean squat...
I had a brand new '78 305ci Camaro LT and at 17yrs old and sure...I thought it was "fast". Compare it to todays cars....or even yesterdays hotrods and it was sssslllloooowwwwwww.....


look it up....
Chevrolet_small-block_engine

or how about all (1st thru 4th gen) the Camaro motors....
http://www.enginefactory.com/Camaro_FirstGen.htm


It was a product of the times. If you needed a motor with more torque then a 6cyl but you want to keep it small...you got a 307...or later a 305. But then again, at one time and in a day of 4.3L V8's....a 305 was about as big a small block as you could get.
__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 07:27 PM   #25
powerdriver 1958
Kid's Mechanic
 
powerdriver 1958's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 8,241
Re: what's wrong with 305's

I wish you gentlemen would just drop all this 305 talk,I have bought two of them and ready to do a 3rd for my plow truck.150 bucks is the most I have spent because "It's just a 305 and not worth much" Thats the best kept secret around these parts!
powerdriver 1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com