![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winnsboro, Texas
Posts: 86
|
performer or performer eps intake
Try to decide between the regular performer or the EPS.
the engine is a GM goodwrench upgraded with summit 202 fuellie heads and a comp 262/270 cam and Hooker headers. I tried using old performer but discovered oil in heat crossover and cant get plug out to install temp gauge sender. so with all the work involved to swap I'm going to put a new intake on just in case the old one is cracked. any thoughts on the two would appreciate the feedback. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marianna Arkansas
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: performer or performer eps intake
With that cam [a good one by the way] and those heads I think the performer is a touch small for it. I would go for a performer RPM. I am not up to date with all of the Edelbrock stuff like I should be and not too sure where the EPS fall into the range of all the others but I know for a fact that the RPM will work great on there and make great power and torque. Jim
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winnsboro, Texas
Posts: 86
|
Re: performer or performer eps intake
Thanks for the help Hugger6933!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|