The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2003, 10:43 PM   #1
Chevy_68
Registered User
 
Chevy_68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: PHX Az
Posts: 155
73-80 suspension on to 67

yeah i just got a complete front suspension with disk brakes off think was 74 chevy pick up and was wondering if it would all bolt up to the 67 front. in other words could i put the lower and uper control arms on it. and all sterring components
Chevy_68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2003, 11:10 PM   #2
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Yes, the control arm will bolt up no prob. You can also change the whole crossmember out if you want. All but two bolts will line right up, and those two can be oblonged to work.

I've never done a power steering swap on a 67. Seems like there is some little difference between them and later trucks, or maybe it's 66 and older, hell I can't remember
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2003, 11:14 PM   #3
Chevy_68
Registered User
 
Chevy_68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: PHX Az
Posts: 155
kool thanks this is good cause i didnt want to pass the offer up free disk brake suspension its kool it'll work
Chevy_68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2003, 01:15 AM   #4
stateamind
And you call that a what?
 
stateamind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 171
My 67 frame didn't have an indent for the power steering gearbox. Because of this I'm using 69 frame I had. I used the whole front crossmember with everything from a 73 and it bolted up perfect with exception to that one hole, bottom front on the sides. Nothing a die grinder couln't fix though.

Also, as far as my knowledge knows, you can just use the newer spindles on what you have. Just gotta change the ball joints to match, as well as the outter tie rod.
stateamind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 03:59 PM   #5
67sub
Registered User
 
67sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: D/FW TX
Posts: 430
CHEVY_68 KEEP US POSTED AS TO WHETHER OR NOT IT WORKS PLEASE, I'M PLANNING THE SAME SWAP IN THE NEAR FUTURE
__________________
2004 Kawasaki KLR
Always looking for a cheap driver
67sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 06:27 PM   #6
stepn67
Junior Member
 
stepn67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 140
What is the benifit to swapping the crossmembers. some other replys to a similar question have indicated that the 73-80 arms and cross shafts could just be bolted directly to the 67 crossmember. I'm currently in the process of updating my 67 to the 73-80 arms and would like get some inputs form the experts here.
stepn67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 11:22 PM   #7
Chevy_68
Registered User
 
Chevy_68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: PHX Az
Posts: 155
will do 67 sub im in the process of ripping apart the 67 suspension
Chevy_68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 05:26 PM   #8
1-PU70
Registered User
 
1-PU70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,036
I did mine years age and used a 77 for parts. I think its a lot easer just to change the uper and lower control arms. I also used the 77 iner and outer tie rod ends and the center link, and of corse the spindales. You can use eather idler arm and pitman arm. Good luck
__________________
1970 CST/10 402,700R4,3:73 posi,AC,PS,PB,TLT,PW,Buckets with heaters
1-PU70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2003, 03:03 PM   #9
gmtrucksaddict
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 60
keep an eye on the upper arm shims, dont lose trackof how many go where under the two upper arm studson both sidesof truck, you will have to visit alignment shop right after this swap


only real difference from 72 to 73 engine cradles is that 72 still had tab with hole for hose to attach toand 73-up hoses go through frame rails and are longer which i think is better anyways, hole is already in 72-older frame rails for 73-up hoses but lines are routed differently
gmtrucksaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2003, 10:55 PM   #10
pa_snowman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Meyersdale, PA
Posts: 144
two questions;
will 72 spindles fit in to 67 a-arms(with the 67 ball joints) and what truck had 6 lug disks that will fit with out changing everything to newer (metric) hardwear?
__________________
jim gallagher
pa_snowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2003, 09:10 PM   #11
Dusti
Not Dusti,just Bob
 
Dusti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Camas,Wa
Posts: 247
72 spindles will not fit,they need 72 balljoints.


bob W
__________________
72 cheyenne super 1/2ton
89 camaro
Dusti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 04:22 PM   #12
boraxman
Keepin an eye out
 
boraxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 3,920
Quote:
Originally posted by Dusti
72 spindles will not fit,they need 72 balljoints.


bob W
Upper or lower or both what about tie rod ends? I want to use '72 spindles on my '70.
__________________
1970 Chevy C10 SWB 5.3
1996 Toyota Tacoma SR5 4x4
2007 Vespa GTS 250 Scooter
ZIP 91351
boraxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 08:59 PM   #13
Dusti
Not Dusti,just Bob
 
Dusti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Camas,Wa
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally posted by boraxman
Upper or lower or both what about tie rod ends? I want to use '72 spindles on my '70.

I think you will need both upper and lower balljoints,you also need the 72 tie rod ends .

I'am in the procces of doing this myself on my 69,I have the front suspension all torn out,I just have to get new balljoints and get it back together.

I tried to stick one of my old balljoints into the newer spindles to see what the differance was and it would not fit,the old balljoint was too big.

Bob W
__________________
72 cheyenne super 1/2ton
89 camaro
Dusti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 09:10 PM   #14
boraxman
Keepin an eye out
 
boraxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 3,920
Thanks, I just threw it out on a new post. Sounds ike a pain.
__________________
1970 Chevy C10 SWB 5.3
1996 Toyota Tacoma SR5 4x4
2007 Vespa GTS 250 Scooter
ZIP 91351
boraxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 10:23 AM   #15
REPO1
Shortbox wanna-be.
 
REPO1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort St.John, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 773
So let me get this straight.

If I plan on using a '73 & up spindle, all I really need is the '73 & up ball joints and outer tie-rod ends? Will the newer style ball joints fit into my '70 A-arms?


Why bother changing out the A-arms then? Maybe just the upper so I could have poly bushings in there.


Thanks!


Reid
__________________
1970 Chevy C20 Custom Camper
402BB Turbo 400 trans. (Slowly becoming a '70 shortbox 1/2 ton)
'71 Camaro SS 402/T400 resto
'97 Z28 (11.41@127MPH)
REPO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 11:29 PM   #16
Dusti
Not Dusti,just Bob
 
Dusti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Camas,Wa
Posts: 247
[QUOTE]Originally posted by REPO1
[B]So let me get this straight.

If I plan on using a '73 & up spindle, all I really need is the '73 & up ball joints and outer tie-rod ends? Will the newer style ball joints fit into my '70 A-arms?


Why bother changing out the A-arms then? Maybe just the upper so I could have poly bushings in there.



I was told that you don't have to change the A-arms just the balljoints and outer tie-rod ends.

I'am going to get the new balljoints on my nexy payday and hopefully get my truck back together.I think I will paint my A-arms first since they are off and clean.

Im will put a post on here when I get it done.Hopefully I wont run into any problems.

BobW
__________________
72 cheyenne super 1/2ton
89 camaro
Dusti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2003, 11:36 PM   #17
REPO1
Shortbox wanna-be.
 
REPO1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort St.John, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 773
Please do. I am eager to do this to my own truck soon.

I think I am going to use a newer upper A-arm as well, just so I can use poly bushings in them.



Reid
REPO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2003, 04:19 PM   #18
nate68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ca
Posts: 1,110
I swapped the whole front setup. hella easy.
__________________
68 short step, 406/700r4, 9" w/discs.
nate68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com