The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2015, 05:33 PM   #1
71CHEVYSHORTBED402
Senior Member
 
71CHEVYSHORTBED402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 7,322
Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Granted these are built very well, but every very now and again I see something I wouldn't do, and sometimes it's by GM. For example, as I'm tearing into the cab recently I've found, all for the dash panel:

Glove box door latch plate. Everything is drilled for screws, but no screws. Works anyway. Unless that has to be removed for the glove box liner, and I can't imagine it would, then has to be factory.

Ash tray bracket. The two screws are missing for the top. As for the bottom, one screwed in from the bottom and the other from the top. Could be from a mechanic. The more I see from the guy I was using, the more I see he wasn't who I thought he was.

Emergency Brake. The bolt is missing to mount to dash panel. Could be from a mechanic.

RH A/C vent.. The screws are supposed to black, the bottom two weren't. One of the clip retainers broken. Not too many reasons to take these off. Edit, found a chuck key inside the duct for the RH A/C vent.

Center A/C vent.. One of the nuts is missing. Seems these could just come loose. Of all the pieces, this is the only one that was noticeably loose.

Off topic, shame the duct hoses are so wide. Would make for a much cleaner build if more narrow. I wouldn't think they had to be this wide. Any recommendations for replacements? That's not to say I wouldn't use OEM or replacement OE.
__________________
Tony
71 Custom Deluxe, SWB, 2WD, 402, A/C. I developed an assembly kit for restoring the (a) truck from the ground up. My build thread, and more on the assembly kit https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=730025

Last edited by 71CHEVYSHORTBED402; 08-31-2015 at 11:10 PM.
71CHEVYSHORTBED402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 06:33 PM   #2
hugger6933
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marianna Arkansas
Posts: 7,280
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

I can remember some exceptional models of trucks like the 95 model of the fullsize were some of the best made in my [less than] expert opinion[cause I owned them all] rebuilding them. It directly relates to worker happiness I think and for instance in not mistaken 95 was a new year for the vin #2 workers[our neighbors to the north] to have a new labor contract. I also can remember some times when the people weren't as happy and the trucks suffered. You have always heard that you want a Wednesday built truck cause on Monday and Tuesday is for recovery and Thursday and Friday are ramping for the next weekend. I don't think it is that extreme though, but something might be said for a Monday morning or Friday late afternoon truck??? Jim
hugger6933 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 07:11 PM   #3
71CHEVYSHORTBED402
Senior Member
 
71CHEVYSHORTBED402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 7,322
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Yep, something to be said. So far what I've found is "it works anyway". That said, this is the most reliable vehicle I've owned. Granted I use this very little now, but over the last 14 years I've had to replace the starter and master cylinder. I haven't even taken a timing light to it in well over a decade.
__________________
Tony
71 Custom Deluxe, SWB, 2WD, 402, A/C. I developed an assembly kit for restoring the (a) truck from the ground up. My build thread, and more on the assembly kit https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=730025

Last edited by 71CHEVYSHORTBED402; 08-29-2015 at 07:23 PM.
71CHEVYSHORTBED402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 07:42 PM   #4
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

a 40 year old truck and you expect it to be factory correct i'll have some of what yer smokin
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 07:51 PM   #5
71CHEVYSHORTBED402
Senior Member
 
71CHEVYSHORTBED402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 7,322
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdowns View Post
a 40 year old truck and you expect it to be factory correct i'll have some of what yer smokin
45
__________________
Tony
71 Custom Deluxe, SWB, 2WD, 402, A/C. I developed an assembly kit for restoring the (a) truck from the ground up. My build thread, and more on the assembly kit https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=730025
71CHEVYSHORTBED402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 10:32 PM   #6
REEDS 72
Registered User
 
REEDS 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: AMERICAN FORK, UTAH
Posts: 535
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdowns View Post
a 40 year old truck and you expect it to be factory correct i'll have some of what yer smokin
x2 LOL
REEDS 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 10:53 PM   #7
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,975
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

someone's been under the dash. Pretty much all those items are the stuff folks rip out when trying to get to the other stuff, have seen similar on most of the ones I've owned. Don't second guess the General (Motors) He's NEVER take any shortcuts!! Ha. But seriously, sounds like all prev owner stuff to me.
jocko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 08:42 AM   #8
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

these trucks were built just right and it is still being proven everyday. Nothing needs changed, except for shoddy work done by lax mechanics. You can reduce the size of your heat duct if you think it will work better. All I now is my experience has been the greatest heater and defroster in than anything else I've owned.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 10:30 AM   #9
Coley
Registered User
 
Coley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria, B.C
Posts: 3,794
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

It sounds to me like someone has been working on your truck at some point....probably installing (troubleshooting?) a different radio/stereo or top speaker etc.
Most of the items you have mentioned are tied to this procedure so a rushed re-assembly job would produce a lot of those results.
Don't sweat it...most are not like that, at least that I've ever seen.
All Good
Coley
__________________
....for some men, there is experience, skill and effort....for the others...there is visa and UPS LOL
1966 Chevy 1/2 ton (Florida- Red/white)
1972 Chevy 1/2 ton (California- Blue/white)
2005 Chevy Silverado HD2500/Duramax
2000 Dodge Ram 1500
Coley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 01:28 PM   #10
54blackhornet
Registered User
 
54blackhornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eastern Oregon
Posts: 2,391
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

I have a 71 C20. It was ordered by Union Pacific, they used it for 52k miles, friends dad bought it at an auction. HE parked it till 04. It has been working since WITHOUT much attention other then plugs, filters and oil ! GM designed and built one hell of a truck that week.....
__________________
71 C-20
07 Magnum RT AWD
54blackhornet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 03:21 PM   #11
RedRoad
Registered User
 
RedRoad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 927
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

I guess no one has seen or heard the documentarys on the CA GM truck plants. Everyone drunk or high, prostitutes, drugs and labor disputes all around. Guys picked up off the streets to fill in for "sick calls" to keep the line moving, upset workers sabotaging hundreds of vehicles due to disputes with some passing through before going to repair lots. Nothing like union labor!

Any retired line workers have any other good stories to share?
RedRoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 08:25 PM   #12
Jrainman
Registered User
 
Jrainman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East PA
Posts: 684
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

The fremont plant in CA was the only plant to produce 67-72 c/k trucks the plant closed in the early 80's and then GM and Toyota reopened the plant on a joint venture , the plant is currently occupied by Tesla.

71 your duct lines must be a certain diameter to carry the airflow correctly
the fan motor and blower cage produce a certain amount of CFM (cubic feet per Minute )

So here is how it works you must fist calculate the area in to cubic feet you are either cooling or heating once you establish that then you can size the correct fan (blower size)

Now you need to move the air throughout the area efficiently this is done with duct work. In our trucks a round flex type duct is used .

but know you have to understand that the size of the duct must be able to support correct air flow something called static pressure is the key ( this is another calculation based on the cfm of the blower you know must convert you cubic feet in to cubic inches in order to establish the correct size ducting .

I am explaining all this because if you plan on changing your ducts to a smaller diameter you will have premature fan failure because you will starve your fan for air and then fan will run hotter and will prematurely burn out

think of it as breathing through a straw all day long............

perhaps your ducts have become dirty or dry rotted and have tiny pin hole leaks .or your fan cage is dirty or broken.
Jrainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 08:58 PM   #13
davischevy
Senior Member

 
davischevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Harrison, Arkansas
Posts: 9,860
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Looks like most of the stuff you mentioned was probably done as people worked on the truck over the years.

On the other hand, I bought a 72 Cheyenne new. After a few miles when I was going down a hill with my foot on the brake, if I hit a bump, it sounded like somebody tapping on the frame with a hammer. Turned out to be one of the lower A-arm bushings was made with the center sleeve off center, leaving very little rubber in between the inner and outer sleeve.

I bought a 69 Chevelle SS out of an estate later and it had the same problem. On the outside of the warranty book there was a hand written note "hammering noise in left front suspension". I guess they never found it.
__________________
other Larry


Build thread, Arkansas K10
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...=755797&page=5





The ability to speak several languages is an asset, but the ability to keep your mouth shut in any language is priceless.
davischevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:19 PM   #14
toms68cst
Registered User
 
toms68cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 4,296
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

The 60's and 70's were not great years for the big three US automakers' quality control. That's one reason the Japanese makers started making such inroads in the 70's.

My truck with factory paint has a lot of paint drips from the factory especially inside the cab. The "Chevrolet" lettering on the tailgate is also poorly painted.
__________________
Unrestored 68 C-10 CST. Original 327. 4-Speed CH465. 50k or so miles.

TREASURER, Drum Brake Club.
toms68cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:52 PM   #15
davischevy
Senior Member

 
davischevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Harrison, Arkansas
Posts: 9,860
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Does anybody remember the paint peeling on the deluxe two tone trucks? I was at the car wash, and the paint on the top of the front fenders looked like confetti flying in the air. They fixed it under warranty.
__________________
other Larry


Build thread, Arkansas K10
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...=755797&page=5





The ability to speak several languages is an asset, but the ability to keep your mouth shut in any language is priceless.
davischevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 10:09 PM   #16
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,676
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Two stories-

1. My dad knew a guy who bought a '64 Impala new. It had a clunk in it from day one. Nobody was ever able to find it, until it got hit in a rear quarter panel, and a Coke can was discovered inside that area. Clunk was gone after that repair.

2. We were replacing the carpet in my son's '70 Dart and discovered a brown paper bag with what appeared to be the remains of a sandwich, in, I believe 2011. That means that sandwich was in there before the carpet was installed in 1969-1970. Bet it smelled real good for a few weeks, back then.

I worked for a GMAD back in 1970, and you wouldn't believe the stories. Hookers coming in after the lunch break, when security was too overwhelmed to check all the badges, drugs and theft. Pretty much like real life, I guess.

I wouldn't expect more of many "mechanics" (I call them parts changers- all bets are off for what they do) I have encountered in my lifetime.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2015, 09:18 AM   #17
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedRoad View Post
I guess no one has seen or heard the documentarys on the CA GM truck plants. Everyone drunk or high, prostitutes, drugs and labor disputes all around. Guys picked up off the streets to fill in for "sick calls" to keep the line moving, upset workers sabotaging hundreds of vehicles due to disputes with some passing through before going to repair lots. Nothing like union labor!

Any retired line workers have any other good stories to share?
Yes, but I'm not retired; been plugging away with GM for 37 years in vehicle assembly and product engineering.

You can see my intro thread for a bunch of stories. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926

Also: Old wive's tales compiled from a bunch of guys about working for GM: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=556607

And growing up in a Pontiac racer's family: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524. Dad also worked for GM for 32 years, starting in 1955.

Those should keep you busy for quite a while.

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 08-31-2015 at 03:02 PM.
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2015, 07:20 PM   #18
leftybass209
Registered User
 
leftybass209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2,189
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Awesome information as usual Keith!

I see no point in even attempting a debate on 67-72 truck quality control. Unless you have a fail safe, day to day documentation of the truck and its entire history from dealership to today, it's way too easy to misrepresent what you are seeing or experiencing.

Can factory workers do dumb and weird stuff? Of course, the ball bearings in some Jaguar chassis placed by a disgruntled employee come to mind.
leftybass209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2015, 08:13 PM   #19
webfoot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hermiston, OR
Posts: 947
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

These were and always have been mass produced trucks, not hand built sports cars and this fact was reflected in the original sales price.

That being said, I doubt I'll ever be able to afford a brand new quad cab 4x4 3/4T truck.. until then my 2005 will have to suffice.
__________________
Running in place gets you nowhere fast.
-me
1968 GTO 4-spd covnvertible

1970 K-20 4-speed, factory AC.
webfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2015, 10:51 PM   #20
71CHEVYSHORTBED402
Senior Member
 
71CHEVYSHORTBED402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 7,322
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedRoad View Post
I guess no one has seen or heard the documentarys on the CA GM truck plants. Everyone drunk or high, prostitutes, drugs and labor disputes all around. Guys picked up off the streets to fill in for "sick calls" to keep the line moving, upset workers sabotaging hundreds of vehicles due to disputes with some passing through before going to repair lots. Nothing like union labor!

Any retired line workers have any other good stories to share?
Yep and as pointed out, mine was built in Fremont Ca. I had no idea ALL were built in Fremont Ca. Great info......................Again, these are built very well, and mine is no exception. I'm the second owner, have owned this 26 years and I've had to do very little, despite the previous owner using it to tow a 5th wheel (never mind the boat launching hitch welded to the front bumper (bummer)).

On topic (NOT post-factory), I've seen two items for the frame under the bed, which is a leaf spring hanger missing a rivit, and the bed stands for the front don't quite match (you have to be looking for it, and it has no bearing).

All told, it's possible all items in the OP were post-factory. Regardless, shoddy work.

Nice information on the duct lines Jrainman. I hadn't ruled that out. For the record, my ducts were shot a long time ago. At this point they're in a resting place known as the dump. Any suggestions for replacements are welcomed, though you've already detailed "stick with the diameter".

Ha, I COMPLETELY forgotten to mention. I found a chuck key somewhere along the duct for the RH A/C vent. Not much reason to drill in the cab post-production, but a CB was added at some point. There are also 6 mystery screw holes in the panel front of the RH door.
__________________
Tony
71 Custom Deluxe, SWB, 2WD, 402, A/C. I developed an assembly kit for restoring the (a) truck from the ground up. My build thread, and more on the assembly kit https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=730025

Last edited by 71CHEVYSHORTBED402; 08-31-2015 at 11:14 PM.
71CHEVYSHORTBED402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 12:57 AM   #21
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,504
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

I don't believe the statement that ''The Fremont plant in CA was the only plant to produce '67 -'72 C/K trucks''... in Post # 12 is true.
While trucks with the "Z" code in their VINs are prolific on the West Coast and the West in general, Fremont wasn't the only plant for trucks.
I have a '68 C/10 Stepside and a '67 K/10 Suburban which came out of Fremont. I also have a '71 GMC Jimmy from St Louis ["S"], and a '72 K/5 parts chassis from ["F"] Flint, MI. I even had a neighbor who had a '68 K/20 from ["T"] Tarrytown, NY.
Let's keep a handle on the misinformation.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 07:23 AM   #22
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71CHEVYSHORTBED402 View Post
Yep and as pointed out, mine was built in Fremont Ca. I had no idea ALL were built in Fremont Ca. Great info......................
67 - 72 pickup assembly plants attached below.

I have launched product in Flint (where I started), Janesville, Pontiac, St Louis and Oshawa. Plus Ft Wayne, Arlington, Silao, Mishawaka (H2), Hamtramck (Volt) and Wentzville (G van). Plus four GM pre-production shops (Pre Production Operations at the Tech Center, Chevy Central Office, the truck Validation Center in Pontiac, and my current offsite location).

During one of the C/K launches we had to bring 7 assembly plants on line at (roughly) the same time. Each plant certainly has it's own "personality".

I don't believe Norwood is correct, as they were F car only.

K

(graphic courtesy of Bruceman1968's VIN decoders)
Attached Images
 
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 09-01-2015 at 11:19 AM.
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 07:39 AM   #23
bruceman1968
Registered User
 
bruceman1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,549
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Norwood is definitely NOT correct
When I did that decoder I wasn't sure about Norwood, so I just left it in. I have since discovered that it wasn't in play in 1967 and after, for Chevy/GMC trucks. In 67 Norwood was building Camaros and Firebirds.(F body as stated) The other 9 are well documented.
__________________
CHEVY/GMC VIN DECODERS

Last edited by bruceman1968; 09-01-2015 at 07:47 AM.
bruceman1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 07:55 AM   #24
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
I have launched product in Flint (where I started), Janesville, Pontiac, St Louis and Oshawa. Plus Ft Wayne, Arlington, Silao, Mishawaka (H2), Hamtramck (Volt) and Wentzville (G van). Plus four GM pre-production shops (Pre Production Operations at the Tech Center, Chevy Central Office, the truck Validation Center, and my current offsite location).
I just noticed, of these lists:

1/3 of the assembly plants no longer exist (Janesville, Pontiac, St Louis and Mishawaka)

1/2 of the pre production shops no longer exist (the Validation Center and Chevy Central office have both been torn down).

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 09:46 AM   #25
bill3rail
Registered User
 
bill3rail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LI, NY 11801
Posts: 1,140
Re: Shoddy work, maybe by GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdowns View Post
a 40 year old truck and you expect it to be factory correct i'll have some of what yer smokin
Quote:
Originally Posted by 71CHEVYSHORTBED402 View Post
45
I would request a warranty inspection! That is insane, all hardware should be perfect with a truck this new!

J/K

Bill
bill3rail is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com