Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-30-2017, 02:04 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Lexington SC
Posts: 119
|
Help finding wheel cylinders on 1970 C60
Hey guys - I'm having the brakes redone on my C60 due to a couple leaky wheel cylinders. I was able to find one of the from the casting number at NAPA, but no luck on the other one. I can't find the 19105 cylinder. I found plenty of the 19108. Anybody run into this before? Do you have cross reference numbers? My truck is a heavy medium with Dayton's. I'm looking specifically for the rears.
Thanks! |
05-30-2017, 08:43 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Iredell, Texas
Posts: 582
|
Re: Help finding wheel cylinders on 1970 C60
Quote:
-Richard
__________________
I may have too many Chevys... Is that possible? 68 c50 pickup build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=704713 |
|
05-30-2017, 09:49 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Beeville, Texas
Posts: 1,943
|
Re: Help finding wheel cylinders on 1970 C60
I have a few books, there's listings for different axle capacities. I don't show the 19105 in any Bendix or Wagner book I have, the 19108 shows up though. Is your truck a tandem axle or single? And does it have one wheel cylinder per side, or an upper and lower?
__________________
RJD 1984 Chevrolet C30 welding truck 454/SM465 1977 GMC C15 pickup 350/TH350 1970 Chevrolet C20 pickup 350/TH400 1970 Chevrolet K20 Suburban 454/TH350 1969 GMC 8500 478M V6/5 spd winch truck Last edited by Robert1970C20rstbukt; 05-30-2017 at 10:09 PM. |
05-31-2017, 09:39 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Lexington SC
Posts: 119
|
Re: Help finding wheel cylinders on 1970 C60
Thanks to both of you for your quick reply. Upon further cleaning and inspection, I feel pretty confident that both the upper and lower and the same 19108 wheel cylinder. The last digit on one of this wasn't stamped deep or maybe it was just caked with junk, but it could pass for a 5, 6, 8 or 9. Visual comparison of the two cylinders show that they look identical. THe fact that the 5 doesn't exist, I've ruled that one out. The 9 has a different bore (1 3/4 vs 1 5/8) so I'm leaning against that one. I really believe the two are the same. I picked up a couple rebuild kits just in case.
I'll let you know how it goes. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|