The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2019, 03:29 PM   #1
Indychus
Registered User
 
Indychus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 141
CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

So I've built bagged trucks, minitrucks, drag cars, etc, but never built a 4WD. Recently, I've gotten the idea stuck in my head that I really want to buy a surplus CUCV at auction. The M1009 better fits my situation since I have 2 kids who would love to ride, but the M1008 has the beefier axles and transfer case. I can swap all of these components out in the future, but I'm trying to get the best bang for my buck right out the gate.

Will the M1009 still be capable enough offroad to keep a 4WD noob happy?

Is it worth giving up the cool factor and rear seat on the M1009 for the beefier driveline?

Anyone ever bought surplus at auction and have an experience to share?

Thanks for any input!

These aren't the specific trucks I'm looking at, but this post seemed a waste with no pictures:

Name:  maxresdefault.jpg
Views: 3660
Size:  39.9 KB

Name:  used-1987-chevrolet-p30-m1008-3814-14829731-1-640.jpg
Views: 5453
Size:  48.4 KB
__________________
Build Thread: Project Overkill 1968
Bagged & Blown Pro Street 1968 Short Fleet
Indychus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 04:26 PM   #2
mongocanfly
Post Whore

 
mongocanfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 14,662
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

I assume the 1009 is the blazer and the 1008 is the truck...
The blazer is more than capable of being a nice trail rig....you dont have to have big heavy axles to have fun...
__________________
Mongo...aka Greg

RIP Dad
RIP Jesse

1981 C30 LQ9 NV4500..http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=753598
Mongos AD- LS3 TR6060...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...34#post8522334
Columbus..the 1957 IH 4x4...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...63#post8082563
2023 Chevy Z71..daily driver
mongocanfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 05:15 PM   #3
Indychus
Registered User
 
Indychus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 141
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

Quote:
Originally Posted by mongocanfly View Post
I assume the 1009 is the blazer and the 1008 is the truck...
The blazer is more than capable of being a nice trail rig....you dont have to have big heavy axles to have fun...
That's correct, the M1008 is the truck- Dana 60 front / 14 bolt rear / NP208.
M1009 is the blazer- 10 bolts front and rear and NP205.

There may be exceptions, this is based on my limited research. I know very little about 4WD so I'm learning as I go.
__________________
Build Thread: Project Overkill 1968
Bagged & Blown Pro Street 1968 Short Fleet
Indychus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 06:14 PM   #4
bigdaddy4x4
Registered User
 
bigdaddy4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: concord ga
Posts: 188
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indychus View Post
That's correct, the M1008 is the truck- Dana 60 front / 14 bolt rear / NP208.
M1009 is the blazer- 10 bolts front and rear and NP205.

There may be exceptions, this is based on my limited research. I know very little about 4WD so I'm learning as I go.
the m1009 blazer has a turbo 400 and 208 tcase.. no np205 in the m1009 and its a real pig with the 6.2 diesel only 132hp and 3.08 gear..
bigdaddy4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 07:32 PM   #5
Indychus
Registered User
 
Indychus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 141
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdaddy4x4 View Post
the m1009 blazer has a turbo 400 and 208 tcase.. no np205 in the m1009 and its a real pig with the 6.2 diesel only 132hp and 3.08 gear..
Thanks for the clarification! The M1008 has 4.56, correct? Sounds like the best approach is to swap M1008 axles into the M1009.
__________________
Build Thread: Project Overkill 1968
Bagged & Blown Pro Street 1968 Short Fleet
Indychus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 07:55 PM   #6
sweetk30
Registered User
 
sweetk30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: horseheads,ny rust belt
Posts: 2,794
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

doing one right now .

m1009 / then police use / then public works use / now private hands owner ship .

she is getting the axle from a m1008 truck . then a nv4500 stick and sbc 400 built up a bit . she is up 7" of lift and on 37" tires now .

here it is mid build .

in stock military form there just 3.08 gear open front and gov-loc rear . 6.2 diesel and th400/208 t-case .

the trucks got the detroit locker rear and basic pickup trucks got open diff front and the service trucks got a light duty trac-loc posi up front / and some got a 205 t-case for the pto option .
Attached Images
 
__________________
77-k30lb BIG truck build .
87-k30lb budget beater build .
85-k30lb the plow machine build .
85-c10sb summer fun toy .
-----------------------------
HOLLEY SNIPER efi = worst case of p.i.t.a i ever had .

EDELBROCK pro flo 4 = best deal going so far . love my setup works great.
sweetk30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 08:17 PM   #7
hatzie
Moderator
 
hatzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,975
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

The military J code 6.2 was 155 hp and 240ft-lb. Peak hp was 2,100 rpm.
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD
1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD
1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD
1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD
1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD
1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD
2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500
2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263
2009 Impala SS LS4 V8


RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...Please include at least the year and model in your threads. It'll be easier to answer your questions.
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful.
hatzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2019, 09:49 PM   #8
Dead Parrot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,583
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

Be aware that the specified max speed for a M1008 is about 55. The stock 6.2 wasn't setup as a fast revving motor. The towing limit with the stock bumper pintle hitch is about 3400lbs. The bumper is basically one of the stamped bumpers with a few special mods to fit the pintle and the tow rings.

If the OP is after a fun truck to enjoy with the kids, go for the M1009 Blazer variant. The 1008 is basically a K30 1 ton PU with a few military wiring bits added on. Snagged one recently off of CL that was a former Fire Department rig and still had the spray rig on it. A lot of the CUCVs went/still going to FD via the Federal Surplus program that allows FD/PD and similar organizations to obtain for minimal costs.

More info can be found on the Steel Soldiers web/forum site including all the TMs. Basically this site for used military equipment.
Dead Parrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2019, 12:50 AM   #9
hatzie
Moderator
 
hatzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,975
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

The NATO electrical is quite different from the civvy trucks.
Dont let that scare you but there are more than a few small differences.
You will not plug two civilian rigs together and start the one with flat dead batteries immediately from the other truck. I've jumped a flat battery deuce from an M1008 and vice versa.
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD
1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD
1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD
1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD
1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD
1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD
2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500
2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263
2009 Impala SS LS4 V8


RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...Please include at least the year and model in your threads. It'll be easier to answer your questions.
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful.
hatzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2019, 06:45 AM   #10
GM72K10
Next!
 
GM72K10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eastern Pa.
Posts: 2,482
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

I personally prefer the m1028s but to each his own. Shown is my m1028a1 slaving my m1028a2 dually.
Both bone stock and still 24 volt. Bought one from Gov Liquidators in 2007 and the other from the state of Pa in 2010. Always think worse case scenario if buying sight unseen at auction.
Attached Images
 
__________________
86 K30 CUCV M1028A1
86 K30 CUCV M1028a2 dually
86 K30 C&C 6.2 4:56s, 4M, 11,000 gvw, ex fire truck, now lowboy dump
More square bodies and CUCVs than I care to admit to
2020 Silverado K3500HD Work truck
GM72K10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2019, 12:17 PM   #11
Indychus
Registered User
 
Indychus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 141
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatzie View Post
The NATO electrical is quite different from the civvy trucks.
Dont let that scare you but there are more than a few small differences.
You will not plug two civilian rigs together and start the one with flat dead batteries immediately from the other truck. I've jumped a flat battery deuce from an M1008 and vice versa.
The starting system is 24V, but everything else is 12V, correct? I assume that the wiring is well documented in the manuals.
__________________
Build Thread: Project Overkill 1968
Bagged & Blown Pro Street 1968 Short Fleet
Indychus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2019, 12:38 PM   #12
hatzie
Moderator
 
hatzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,975
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

It's a mix of civilian 12v and 24v NATO wiring.
Download the DOD Tech Manuals "TMs" from Steel Soldiers.
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD
1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD
1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD
1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD
1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD
1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD
2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500
2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263
2009 Impala SS LS4 V8


RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...Please include at least the year and model in your threads. It'll be easier to answer your questions.
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful.
hatzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2019, 12:39 PM   #13
Indychus
Registered User
 
Indychus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 141
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

Awesome, thanks! I'll check that out.
__________________
Build Thread: Project Overkill 1968
Bagged & Blown Pro Street 1968 Short Fleet
Indychus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2019, 01:54 PM   #14
Killer Bee
Registered User
 
Killer Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Barber City, CA
Posts: 4,794
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

well my suggestion of course is to buy one of each!

although may be an underwhelming driving experience, they are quite capable for intended use..

the NA GM diesels are not going to blast you to the finish line in first place, but you will eventually get there

don't forget your pioneer kit though!

I had the joy of operating and maintaining this pair in the unit I retired from, few others of the years I wasn't as attached to

as mentioned above, lots of online documentation and a fairly large following to get assistance from..

good luck!









__________________
I started out with nothing - and I still have most of it
Killer Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2019, 01:49 PM   #15
jrpontiac
Registered User
 
jrpontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 122
Re: CUCV - M1008 vs M1009

I bought a Humvee through Govplanet a few years back. If you are thinking about going that route pick a few cities that auction them off and watch the results for a few months. The purchase process was easy but lengthy, the vehicle was accurately described and I had no problems with it. With that being said I count myself lucky because I have heard horror stories. Drove it for a couple years and sold it last summer. Made maybe $500 on the deal which was a new experience since I always seem to be losing money.

You will get tired of having a top speed of 55mph.
Attached Images
 
__________________
1977 Chevy C10 SB, Turbo 5.3ls, TH400
jrpontiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com