The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2006, 06:09 PM   #1
pkj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: waycross ga.
Posts: 438
dumb idea?

before i bought my 68 long fleet side or started following this forumn, ive had this idea that wont go away. i want to keep the long wheel base but shorten the rear of the bed about 18 inchs. i think it might look good long wheel base/short bed. awhile ago i saw something about this and a small pitcure somewhere on this site but cant find it. i figure long wheel bases arent worth much, so it would not be a big injustice to this model. what do you think? stupid? anyone have pics or thoughts either way on this? thanks pkj
pkj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 06:11 PM   #2
matthufham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Carl Junction, Missouri
Posts: 2,061
Re: dumb idea?

18 inches? that's about everything after the wheeltub. you'd have to hack the frame off. here's a weird truck to look at
Attached Images
 
matthufham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 06:22 PM   #3
larry may
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 3,256
Re: dumb idea?

Yipper: Shorten frame is farmer enough. We did an old GMC . It looked alright when pulling a trailor or sittting in the drive . Was a 1952 mabe 3/4 ton. Yours hmmmmm! post some pics after the butcher job....lol
larry may is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 06:57 PM   #4
rancid
Registered User
 
rancid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: utah
Posts: 182
Re: dumb idea?

do it, it will look cool. i plan on building a long bed 2wd with 20,s on front and fat 22,s with kind of a pro-streeted look. as soon as my 69 crewcab is done.

Last edited by rancid; 09-21-2006 at 06:59 PM.
rancid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 07:05 PM   #5
msgross
Registered User
 
msgross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 12,201
Re: dumb idea?

I think that it would look like a pulling truck!
Which isn't all bad....
______________________________________________________

My Garage:
1968 SWB K-10
2005 Tahoe
UH-60A/L Helicopter
FLY ARMY!
Attached Images
 
msgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 07:07 PM   #6
pkj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: waycross ga.
Posts: 438
Re: dumb idea?

thanks for the pic. that was the one i saw before. i still like the idea but something in that pic dosnt sit well with me. not sure what it is, maybe the molding, or that bed was not shortened but wheel base moved back? thanks for the butcher vote Larry. anymore on the caddy motor? would like more feedback. thanks pkj
pkj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 07:14 PM   #7
purple gas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: saskatoon, planet earth
Posts: 686
Re: dumb idea?

More or less along the same lines. ( rare for me ) Has anyone ever seen a long box truck with a foot cut out between the cab and wheels, but not shortened at the back, like a normal person would do if turning a long fleetside into a short one? if you know what I mean.
__________________
I got a bench seat baby, you don't have to sit over there.
purple gas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 07:31 PM   #8
matthufham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Carl Junction, Missouri
Posts: 2,061
Re: dumb idea?

this truck has a 7 foot bed, a foot was taken out between the cab and wheel like "purple gas" described
Attached Images
 

Last edited by matthufham; 09-21-2006 at 07:32 PM.
matthufham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 07:55 PM   #9
extd56
Senior Member
 
extd56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,272
Re: dumb idea?

This extended cab truck had the bed shortened in front of the wheels as I recall about 15".
Attached Images
  
extd56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 08:38 PM   #10
qksilver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Pines NC
Posts: 3,853
Re: dumb idea?

There is an old ford, I think 71, running around here that the owner said was a factory job. The rear of the bed was about a foot shorter than a normal long bed.
I can't see any benifit except maybe towing
qksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 09:14 PM   #11
trkklr77
Account Suspended
 
trkklr77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vacaville ca, because it as far from indy as i can be
Posts: 777
Re: dumb idea?

it will look goofy as all hell, ive seen it done to 4x4s.
trkklr77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 09:20 PM   #12
lilpup69chevy
67-72 parts finder
 
lilpup69chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: southeast mo
Posts: 788
Re: dumb idea?

i know a guy with a about a 85 or so 4x4 chevy with a cut down short bed on a blazer frame looks kinda neat next time i'm out that way i'll take a picture of it
__________________
1969 chevy shortstep 2wd (under construction)
1981 chevy scottsdale lwb 2wd (parts chaser)
2004 pontiac gto (daily driver)
2004 pontiac grand prix gt (the ol ladys car)
1985 chevy short wide
1970 chevy c10 lwb (another parts rig)
1969 gmc lwb (rainy day project)
1968 chevy lwb c10 250 I6 3 spd (soon to be swb)
lilpup69chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 10:59 PM   #13
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,861
Re: dumb idea?

You had this idea before you came to this forum.You didn`t change your mind once you read all the negative comments regarding this very think?At best,some will agree if it is for the practicle purpose of using the truck for trailering.But,do it for looks?Leave it be.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 01:57 AM   #14
Brad
Out of the carpool lane.
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Clark Co, WA
Posts: 5,673
Re: dumb idea?

Here's a goofy one on the other side of town.
http://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/car/208879310.html
Attached Images
 
__________________

1968 C-10 SWB, 5.7 Vortec/700R4/3.73 posi, Torch Red
1968 Camaro, 250/Powerglide, all original (No, I'm not gonna drop a 350 in it!...Jeez!)
2000 Honda VFR in the faster yellow!
2008 Husqvarna TE-610

1967 C-10 SWB 'Six Appeal'-Gone but not forgotten...

Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 02:04 AM   #15
ThatOneBlue67
I survived Dead Man's Curve.
 
ThatOneBlue67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Nine-Five-687
Posts: 389
Re: dumb idea?

Yikes......
__________________
"The people should not be afraid of their government. The government should be afraid of it's people."

"The Hurricane"
1967 Chevrolet C10
350 Eight Cylinder, 700R4 BowtieOverdrive




Cherry Bomb... Disturbing the Peace Since 1968.
ThatOneBlue67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 02:11 AM   #16
71SWBChevy
Post Whore
 
71SWBChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Owensboro KY
Posts: 11,905
Re: dumb idea?

I am going against the grain here and say that it looks cool, I have always loved the way the pulling trucks have the wheels at the very rear of the bed and as long as your doing it with a fleetside I think it will look sweet, but who cares what we like, if you want it do it, thats what its all about. But personally I love the way that picture looks, maybe not as cool to me as a short fleet but deffinately cooler than a long fleet and more rare than either!
__________________
Drew

'71 Chevy 350/TH350 Hugger Orange
Currently just a rolling frame, body work soon to follow!!!
Check out my Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=212927

Daily Driver: 1997 Chevrolet S-10 with more gears than pistons
71SWBChevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 07:06 AM   #17
redneckgirl
Registered User
 
redneckgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bel Air, Maryland
Posts: 4,853
Re: dumb idea?

I say leave it be...but I am partial....I have a long bed fleetside
__________________
The place where you made your stand never mattered. Only that you were there... and still on your feet.
Stephen King
redneckgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 07:59 AM   #18
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: dumb idea?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkj;
.... i figure long wheel bases arent worth much, so it would not be a big injustice to this model. what do you think? stupid? anyone have pics or thoughts either way on this? thanks pkj
If you are really asking opinions on this then I will offer mine. For any car/truck to look aesthetically pleasing it has to have balance and symmetry. In other words the lines need to flow. If you change the proportions drastically the balance is interrupted and the lines do not flow.

I vote you don't hack it up, because I think it will look retarded.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 12:55 PM   #19
pkj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: waycross ga.
Posts: 438
Re: dumb idea?

man i love all the adverse opions!!! would like to see more pics. this thing keeps sticking with me. i will scale sketch the truck and look for something that still keeps the balance. i can get 18 inches out easy, but may only go 12 inches. also thinking about a little bit of a rake ao the back section instead of just straight up and down. i like the negative as well as positive comments. thanks pkj
pkj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 01:03 PM   #20
beaterC10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,277
Re: dumb idea?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad View Post
Here's a goofy one on the other side of town.
http://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/car/208879310.html
I like that truck, but man that would be a miserable beast to ride in.

The Air Force used tugs similar to that in the 80's that were shortened 3/4 ton Fords. You could move anything, but they would beat you senseless at any kind of speed.
beaterC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 01:06 PM   #21
beaterC10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,277
Re: dumb idea?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkj View Post
man i love all the adverse opions!!! would like to see more pics. this thing keeps sticking with me. i will scale sketch the truck and look for something that still keeps the balance. i can get 18 inches out easy, but may only go 12 inches. also thinking about a little bit of a rake ao the back section instead of just straight up and down. i like the negative as well as positive comments. thanks pkj

Didn't Ford do something like that in the 70's or 80's? They didn't cut the bed down, but I thought they moved the rear axle back on some of the heavy duty or trailering pickups.
beaterC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 08:16 PM   #22
pissonNOS
senior member
 
pissonNOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
Re: dumb idea?

there is / was a 73-87 in town here cut like that ill try and take some pics this weekend for ya might give another opinion
__________________
69 GMC bagged
pissonNOS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 03:02 AM   #23
Brad
Out of the carpool lane.
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Clark Co, WA
Posts: 5,673
Re: dumb idea?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beaterC10 View Post
Didn't Ford do something like that in the 70's or 80's? They didn't cut the bed down, but I thought they moved the rear axle back on some of the heavy duty or trailering pickups.
Yes, Ford did do that as some sort of camper special in the 70's. They were built specifically for otc campers. This sorta thread came up a year or two ago and there were pics. Several weeks later I saw one in person in my town driving around.
__________________

1968 C-10 SWB, 5.7 Vortec/700R4/3.73 posi, Torch Red
1968 Camaro, 250/Powerglide, all original (No, I'm not gonna drop a 350 in it!...Jeez!)
2000 Honda VFR in the faster yellow!
2008 Husqvarna TE-610

1967 C-10 SWB 'Six Appeal'-Gone but not forgotten...

Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 09:32 AM   #24
rancid
Registered User
 
rancid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: utah
Posts: 182
Re: dumb idea?

fords was a full long bed with the wheelwell just positioned as far back as it could go, and i had only seen them in the 73-76 body style 3/4 ton and i dont think they made themin a 4wd. but to take a better 67-72 body style long bed and leave the wheelbase and bob the bed i think if everything was done right. with i bit of a raked stance and some big wheels and even bigger in the rear could look really cool. and in the 4wd trucks i see these alot at moab and they look very good, but always to beat for my style. i say just do it.
rancid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2006, 07:02 PM   #25
pissonNOS
senior member
 
pissonNOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
Re: dumb idea?

heres the truck i was talking about
Attached Images
 
__________________
69 GMC bagged
pissonNOS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com