The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2009, 02:40 PM   #1
JesseSimon
Asks alot of questions
 
JesseSimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, Arkansas
Posts: 231
Opinions on 283 Motor..

I pickup up a 66 LWB this week, its got an original 283/powerglide 2 speed combo in it..

Im just looking for opinions on if this pair can tweaked for performance or would I be better off modernizing?

I asked over there in the 60-66 page and Im getting no bites...anyone here got an opinion?
__________________
MY STABLE:
'66 C10 LWB turning it into a shortbed stepside
'77 LWB (my daily driver).....oh its a FORD ahhhhh!
'07 MAZDA 3 (the wife's ride)
JesseSimon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 02:48 PM   #2
haysonj
Registered User
 
haysonj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Santa Maria, Ca.
Posts: 1,423
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseSimon View Post
I pickup up a 66 LWB this week, its got an original 283/powerglide 2 speed combo in it..

Im just looking for opinions on if this pair can tweaked for performance or would I be better off modernizing?

I asked over there in the 60-66 page and Im getting no bites...anyone here got an opinion?
They can be tweaked just like any motor but it would probably be more cost effective to buy a 350 with the performance package you want.
__________________
69 Chevy 4x4 383 Power
haysonj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:56 PM   #3
69GMCLonghorn
Registered User
 
69GMCLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

haysonj is probably right in terms of ease of upgrading. As they say, there no replacement for displacement!

But! That aside, I like the 283. Unless you're planning on really hot rodding it, stick with it. Rebuild it and get it back in top shape and just enjoy driving it. In terms of the tranny, that'll depend on what you want to spend. The old PowerSlushes were good, but 2 speeds limits the performance a bit. If you're looking to upgrade, go with a 700R4. That would be a great combo for gas mileage, driveability, etc.
69GMCLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:57 PM   #4
FLDBRED
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CENTRAL,NJ
Posts: 586
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

A Turbo 350 in place of that powerglide would really wake up your truck!I would try that first,it may be all you need.The 700r4 and 2004r are also great choices depending on your budget.

Last edited by FLDBRED; 06-15-2009 at 04:01 PM.
FLDBRED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 04:03 PM   #5
69GMCLonghorn
Registered User
 
69GMCLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLDBRED View Post
A Turbo 350 in place of that powerglide would really wake up your truck!I would try that first,it may be all you need.The 700r4 and 2004r are also great choices depending on your budget.
Honestly, the TH350 is better than the 200/700R4; But you get the benefit of the Overdrive,which would have to yield some good mileage numbers in a set up like that.
69GMCLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 06:27 PM   #6
VDOG
Grand PooBaa Member
 
VDOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 5,302
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I've had my slightly built 283 in my truck for over 10 years now. It has been very dependable. Has a very big cam, ( i suggest something smaller) headers, HEI, intake and carb. Runs very well, just time for a rebuild because of the blowback. If your not trying to go back in time or set some speed records, go for the 283. If I had gears other than these 3:08's I think I could do some damage on the street. Although it will scoot when I step on it.
Attached Images
  
VDOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:59 PM   #7
knsmodels
I make Models
 
knsmodels's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bucks, PA
Posts: 626
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I ran a 283 in my Chevelle for years when I was working on the BBC and the car was my daily ride......just like any sbc it will run forever and perform more than adequately when needed...I loved it and it was extremely reliable....I highly recommend them.....
__________________
Click to see what I do

1972 LWB K10 350/4 sp
1968 SS Chevelle 396/tremac5spd
knsmodels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 10:19 PM   #8
Yullose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 76
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

If you want performance, you shouldn't be foolin with a lil 283 AND a big heavy truck .

Repeat after me...

Power to weight...

Power to weight...

Power to weight...

Now don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with a 283... in fact, I'd love to have another one myself... they are bulletproof and reliable motors... and with the short 3.00" stroke, you can spin the heck out of 'em too...

That said, there are 350's out there a dime a dozen. That would be a better starting point and most all of the accessories should bolt right on anything pre-'85.
I'd save the 283 for a nice mild cruising motor or sell it to a collector looking for something of that year vintage.
Yullose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 11:46 AM   #9
VDOG
Grand PooBaa Member
 
VDOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 5,302
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

Forgot to mention, after over 10 years of the 283, im now building a 350 to have more performance and the same dependability as the 283 was.
Like the post above says, 350's are a dime a dozen, I paid $175 for mine with 190/202 heads. If you pull your own from a wrecking yard its bout $100.
Attached Images
   
VDOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 01:30 PM   #10
mclairmo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Take Off
Posts: 1,908
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

If you want economy, use the 283. If you want any kind of performance you are wasting time and money on the 283. Start off with a 350, 400 or 383. The extra displacement will improve performance alone and will be able to take better advantage of a new carb, intake, headers, etc.
mclairmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 01:36 PM   #11
69GMCLonghorn
Registered User
 
69GMCLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I say you should be different and keep the 283. Build it up however you want or run it stock. It's a great motor. When you go to your next car/truck show, find out how many people have a "350/350" combination... MILLIONS... Be different and enjoy it.
69GMCLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 01:36 PM   #12
BluTrukker
BOHICA
 
BluTrukker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stewartville, MN
Posts: 440
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I like the looks of VDOG's engine. I would suggest going in that direction. If you are looking to build big horseys, maybe look for more cubes. Otherwise keep it, anyone can have a 350, the 283 should have sufficient power and a th350 or 700r4 would both be good trannies.
__________________
Trying to save someone from their own stupidity is like teaching a pig to dance. It is a waste of your time, and it annoys the pig!
BluTrukker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 01:39 PM   #13
big_al_71
Registered User
 
big_al_71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,375
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

sell the 283/powerglide get a 350/350 combo and start from there is exactly what I would do.
__________________
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please!!!!!.



Sylvester's build thread >>>http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ht=big+rebuild
big_al_71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 02:01 PM   #14
VDOG
Grand PooBaa Member
 
VDOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 5,302
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluTrukker View Post
I like the looks of VDOG's engine. I would suggest going in that direction. If you are looking to build big horseys, maybe look for more cubes. Otherwise keep it, anyone can have a 350, the 283 should have sufficient power and a th350 or 700r4 would both be good trannies.

Thanks Blu:
I also have a 350 trans in my truck. Now take note, my 283 is all roller componets, rockers, cam, etc, so some money was spent. What the guys are saying, money that was put in my engine, you could put in a 350, probably for less and have better power and performance. Bottom line, think about what you want to do, and go for whats best for you.
VDOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 09:12 PM   #15
68c10guy
Registered User
 
68c10guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 165
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

i've had two 700r4's in my truck and unless you get them set up right the first time they burn up. AS a result of this i am replacing my 700 with a th350. just my opinion.
68c10guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 09:18 PM   #16
hilandr452
Registered User
 
hilandr452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 357
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I've heard nothing but good things about 283 motors, especially in that year pickup. If you rebuild it stock and toss a properly built 700r4 , you'll be more than happy and that motor will run long after you're dust.



Dan
__________________
Dan Smith
Colorado Springs, CO
71 GMC Custom Camper "Longhorn" 454, TH400
73 Chevy Camper Special (Yes, it's badged a camper special) Flat Bed Motorhome conversion 454, standard tranny


"DON'T TREAD ON ME !!!"



My Project: http://www.picturetrail.com/sfx/album/view/20829244 , http://www.picturetrail.com/sfx/album/view/24654442
hilandr452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 01:45 PM   #17
JesseSimon
Asks alot of questions
 
JesseSimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, Arkansas
Posts: 231
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I like the idea of staying with the 283 to be a little different, I have a 700R4 but it has 180k on it so its due to be rebuilt. How do you "build it right"?
__________________
MY STABLE:
'66 C10 LWB turning it into a shortbed stepside
'77 LWB (my daily driver).....oh its a FORD ahhhhh!
'07 MAZDA 3 (the wife's ride)
JesseSimon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 02:15 PM   #18
69GMCLonghorn
Registered User
 
69GMCLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

Well, if you just did a standard rebuild (whatever that might be) and make sure you have a good tranny cooler installed, you should have no problems. I think you can have a stonger valve body installed to firm up the shifts, which I would strongly recommend. The stock ones are mushy... excuse me... "SMOOTH"... I like to feel the shift without losing U-joints in the process.

Oh yeah, I'd install a tranny temp gauge too, just for safety sake.
69GMCLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 11:06 PM   #19
redbaron69
Registered User
 
redbaron69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: marion nc
Posts: 588
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

if your building the truck to just get out a cruise keep the 283.
__________________
69 short fleet 350/350 "under construction"
70 short step 307/3 speed
redbaron69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:28 AM   #20
Average Joe
Registered User
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 1,352
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

I dont mean to discourage the overdrive behind your 283 but you might want to reconsider. The 283 which you already know is a very snappy motor but not big on torque. Torque @ 2500 rpm is what you need to push through the air at 70 mph. I think as a result of an overdrive install (depending on rear gears of course) you might actually be lugging that 283 and losing mpg if not gaining much at all. My vote would be a TH350. They are very cheap compared to the 700 and very easy to install with no TV cable issues. BTW I digg those LIL 283's. I've got one in my 'burb but when it comes time to rebuild I think i'll swap to something bigger and save the 283 for my Nova.
Average Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 06:30 AM   #21
FLDBRED
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CENTRAL,NJ
Posts: 586
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

A good HEI dist. would also help that little guy.You could also use a stock cast iron 4 barrel intake and a spread bore type carb,this setup seems to retain a little more bottom end than an aluminum set-up.It will also give better mileage than a 2 barrel.
FLDBRED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 01:57 PM   #22
VDOG
Grand PooBaa Member
 
VDOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 5,302
Re: Opinions on 283 Motor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLDBRED View Post
A good HEI dist. would also help that little guy.You could also use a stock cast iron 4 barrel intake and a spread bore type carb,this setup seems to retain a little more bottom end than an aluminum set-up.It will also give better mileage than a 2 barrel.

Im going to have to disagree with keeping the stock intake. Well at least for me, on my 283 I had no bottom end, and top end came in eventullay.
In fact that was the last thing I added after Carb, dist, headers had been on the truck awhile. When I change to an aluminum intake, thats when bottom end torque (not a lot) came into play. Guess it depends on your setup, plus that stock intake weighs a ton!

Last edited by VDOG; 06-18-2009 at 01:57 PM.
VDOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com