The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


View Poll Results: What kind of paint scheme
Orange on bottom fade up to black with black tinted windows 2 22.22%
All Blacked Out Oil Slick 1 11.11%
Solid Orange 2 22.22%
Flat Orange Low Gloss (matte/Egg shell-ish) Just not shiny 1 11.11%
All Blacked Out Low Gloss (matte/Egg shell-ish) 3 33.33%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2010, 12:24 AM   #1
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Hi there this is my first thread. been coming to the site for years though. As the title says I have a 70' Fleetside Short Box. I would love to put a motor in this truck that would make it do a wheelie but with fuel prices steadily rising im leaning more on the practical side of things. I found a GM 3.8 V6 out of a 96 Pontiac van for $150. It has 150,000 miles and runs great. Comes complete with computer and all (Craigslist Find). Also found a complete Super Charger for this motor for $100 (Also a craigslist find) Has anybody ever done this motor swap in an old pickup like this? If So was it easy? What needs to be done with remapping the computer? Im going to pair it up with a Post 87' 700R4 cause i heard the valve body was stronger then? Im hoping for north of 20mpg. Is this even plausible? Also side note is it difficult to switch over to power brakes from all drums. Thanks for all the advice everyone.

PS any mod suggestions or your favorite mods for this Gen body style are welcome to.



Last edited by blazerboy_4life; 09-26-2010 at 11:50 PM. Reason: Changed Photo to smaller pic
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 07:13 AM   #2
SSC's76
No No
 
SSC's76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

wow need to reduce that picture down a tad.

For starters van engine is a FWD going to need special mounts to get it to fit different mounting points then the RWD f body engine which are closer to what you would want. Need to use a trans from a small 6 as well v8 tranny wont bolt up. FWD engine has the manifold pointed the wrong way no big deal it fits either direction but the SC intake can only go one way and work. Since you got some room to work with the truck engine compartment and you need to fab custom mounts anyway I could see it being able to be run with the throttle body pointing toward the firewall just would require custom duct work. I know pople that have left the stock non sc ecm and ran a sc on there 3.8l fwd's i recommend getting an ecm made for a sc engine as well as the correct knock sensor.
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop.
Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out.
1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler
SSC's76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 09:27 AM   #3
Pop's C-10
Registered User
 
Pop's C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: memphis
Posts: 2,537
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

it will need more tha jus tha s/c to make that motor run...goggle Top swap & you see what i mean. that lil 3.8 will catch h&^l tryin to pull that truck around
Pop's C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 06:10 PM   #4
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

A member on the Chevytalk board installed a Buick turbo engine in his truck and was extremely happy with the performance. His install was a little easier than yours because he started with a RWD engine from a G-body, but I don't think you will have any problems you can't overcome. You will have a huge amount of room to work around the engine.

For a transmission, I am thinking maybe 4th gen Camaro/Firebird. S-10 4 cylinder and 2.8 V-6 transmissions will also bolt up, but the F-body came stock with a 3800.

Ray
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 01:32 AM   #5
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Quote:
Originally Posted by raycow View Post
A member on the Chevytalk board installed a Buick turbo engine in his truck and was extremely happy with the performance. His install was a little easier than yours because he started with a RWD engine from a G-body, but I don't think you will have any problems you can't overcome. You will have a huge amount of room to work around the engine.

For a transmission, I am thinking maybe 4th gen Camaro/Firebird. S-10 4 cylinder and 2.8 V-6 transmissions will also bolt up, but the F-body came stock with a 3800.

Ray
Would you happen to have a link to that build? I would love to talk to him and see what he had to overcome to make it happen.
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 02:00 AM   #6
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazerboy_4life View Post
Would you happen to have a link to that build?
Unfortunately, no. This was a few years ago on Chevytalk and the search over there is kind of flaky unless you can enter an exact text string, which I can't.

Ray
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 11:53 PM   #7
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Forgive me if this is a stupid question but what body styles do the term F-body apply to? I know it would be better to put a rear wheel drive motor in but the only difference is the intake correct?
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 12:11 AM   #8
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

F-body is Camaro/Firebird. Besides the intake manifold, the mounting hole locations on the block are different between FWD and RWD. Since you will have to fab your own mounts anyway, this shouldn't cause you too much extra work.

Ray

Last edited by raycow; 09-27-2010 at 12:38 AM.
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 11:24 PM   #9
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Would I be over-torquing that motor in something as heavy as that 70swb?
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 11:30 PM   #10
cableguy0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,950
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Even a junkyard 350 will net you better performance and be a much easier install. That v6 just isnt going to make the torque needed. The engine mounts are going to be a complete and total pain in the @ss to get right. Your going to need the harness and computer reworked. That engine is designed to work with a computer controlled electronic transmission. Theres not a chance of getting anywhere close to 20 mpg because you will be working the engine fairly hard most of the time. Maybe downhill in neutral with a tail wind.
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member.
cableguy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 12:15 AM   #11
Number21
Registered User
 
Number21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 611
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Even a junkyard 350 will net you better performance and be a much easier install.
Bingo. Your truck isn't going to get north of 20mpg even if it's being towed. Engine displacement really doesn't have as much to do with gas mileage as people think it does...
__________________
'73 K20 Cheyenne Super Camper Special 350/TH350/NP205 sittin' on 33's.

You can set my truck on fire and roll it down a hill,
and I still wouldn't trade it for a Coupe de Ville.

Last edited by Number21; 10-26-2010 at 12:15 AM.
Number21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 01:28 AM   #12
60ratrod
yes, i do
 
60ratrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, wa
Posts: 2,734
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

I 3rd that. Going efi is a good step in gaining mpgs. But that lil v6 won't do a lick of good in that truck. The only v6 i would even considder using would be a 4.3. It will bolt in place of an sbc, but doing an efi swap like a tbi or tpi swap is going to net you better results due to the power to weight ratio, which is why that 3800 would be too over tasked in a heavy truck
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
ERROR 404....... SNAPPY COMEBACK NOT FOUND
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

-60 Chevy C10, dead 350/good th350 combo, sitting on a 76 c10 blazer frame, built from 11 different vehicles "the abomination"
-07 gmt900 silverado 1500 lt xcab z71, granite blue
-81 suzuki gs650g "shelah"- current project
-81 kz1000m1 csr "sarge" -next project (just beautification)
-07 kawasaki vulcan classic vn900
60ratrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 05:30 PM   #13
bradh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 84
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

My Dad's '64 C10 is getting 18-20mpg with a tko600 tranny and a 350 with vortec heads and a Performer RPM Airgap. Cam is 219 @.050 on the intake side. That would meet your milage goal and have MUCH more power. FWD engine layout does not make for an easy rwd swap. I'd just build a tame 350 or even a 305, toss an OD tranny behind and enjoy 20+ mpg, cheap parts and the easy swap. I'll bet you could score a good running 305 with roller cam and one piece rear main seal for practically free.
bradh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 12:47 AM   #14
60ratrod
yes, i do
 
60ratrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, wa
Posts: 2,734
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

If yoy were lookin to go the 305 route i got one from an 88 firebird that you could have if you lived closer
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
ERROR 404....... SNAPPY COMEBACK NOT FOUND
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

-60 Chevy C10, dead 350/good th350 combo, sitting on a 76 c10 blazer frame, built from 11 different vehicles "the abomination"
-07 gmt900 silverado 1500 lt xcab z71, granite blue
-81 suzuki gs650g "shelah"- current project
-81 kz1000m1 csr "sarge" -next project (just beautification)
-07 kawasaki vulcan classic vn900
60ratrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 01:23 PM   #15
Pyrotechnic
Registered User
 
Pyrotechnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

I can be done and yes the motor did get great mileage in the F-body cars, but you must consider that the F-body is quite a bit lighter than the truck, and most importantly the aerodynamics are FAR better than the truck will ever be.

That said, it's going to be a lot of trouble for a result that feels underpowered and doesn't get that great of fuel economy.

Instead, look into a TBI 305 or 350 with a 700R4.
__________________
1977 GMC Sierra Grande
Pyrotechnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 01:00 AM   #16
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

Thanks for all your thoughts guys. I think im going to scrap this idea all together. It sounded good on paper but weighing out all the options its a lot more work and it adds a lot more complexity to a project that ultimately I want to remain very simple. I just ran into a sweet deal where im getting the engine of my choice built for free (i supply the parts of course). So think i might switch to the other direction and go for HP in stead of MPG... You only live once right?
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 08:32 AM   #17
stich626
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hingham ma
Posts: 1,721
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

ok as above your idea is good but you need a little help..
the van is fwd. get a f body (camaro/ trans am) 3.8(3800)
and the tranny.
I'd if you don't want the wire'n nitemare
get the 3.8 buick(same engine) out of a g body or b body (get the buick it has the dissy in the front, the chevy is dissy in the back and is a 229 the buick is 231)
get the mounts frame stands all of it..
the engines will have a 2brl carb , unless you get a t type or g/n 3.8
it bolts into the truck use'n the sbc frame stands to mount the motor mounts to. (you'll have to drill a few holes in the frame stand(trucks)
other than oil leaks they run forever..
if you wand efi and spark control. the latest f body you can find, some had sticks..
but remember the tranny is at an angle to fit under the floor of a f body..
and may cause fits when installing under the truck..
good luck..
FYI
IF YOU CAN FIND A 3.8 Q JET INTAKE the older 3.8 will get the same mpg as the efi one. within 1mpg.
untill you hammer it.. then all bets are off..

a 2nd gen f body inline 6 will get you better mpg. as it makes more ft lb down low..
but the 3.8 will run away from it when you slam the hammer down
stich626 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 09:46 AM   #18
no talent
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: brookville, Ohio
Posts: 20
Re: 70 Shortbox Chevy 2wd considering a GM 3800?

No, it's not a chevy truck they are talking about, but I would go to www.bruntonauto.com. Look at the installs of the 3800 with supercharger. They offer a plug and play wiring harnes to mate the 3800 Park Avenue with blower to a manual transmission. I keep thinking about it for one of my trucks but my kids keep taking all my money. Always wanting something.........food, clothes, shelter, it just never ends.
no talent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
3.8, 3800, 700r4, motor, motor swap


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com