The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 07+ Chevy and GMC Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2011, 11:23 AM   #1
Non_Sequitor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 56
Re: K&N CAI... anyone install one yet?

I just came to this thread from link posted on another one about the same subject. I think there might be a little confusion going on about K&N's fouling MAFs. It is very easy to over-oil a K&N, and yes, it will foul your MAF. The truth is, however, that a K&N does not require a lot of oil, and if properly done, no oil will contaminate your MAF at all. The K&N product is one of quality and good craftsmanship, but it is, of course, not the only one out there. Some folks may not want to deal with re-oiling their filter after cleaning, and prefer to stay with a dry filter like the above mentioned GMPP one. As far as CAI's not providing any power over stock on a dyno, this is generally true, but don't take that at face value. The vehicle has to be moving in most cases to see any appreciable effects with a CAI, plus the newer vehicles will almost always require an associated electronic tune to reap the real benefits of even a CAI. Even with large fans, there is no way to duplicate a vehicle driving down the road while using a chassis dyno. Some manufacturers have started manufacturing CAI's that do not require electronic tuning in recent years, however these also offer considerably less power potential - if any at all. Nobody's going to set the world on fire with just a CAI, so please don't fall for a lot of the advertising promising huge power gains. You won't even feel it in the seat of your pants most likely, but you may notice it in mileage or mph at the track. The newer the trucks get, the more efficient their designs are as well. So, if you take the GMT900's for instance, an aftermarket manufacturer will have to look at new ways to engineer their product to improve upon an already good set-up. The companies that have the more resources tend to be better at this, but there are some resourceful small companies that can do well also. I guess my point is, do your homework. The manufacturers want to sell their products, and will make some pretty incredible claims. However, testing by shops on dynos is not always a conclusive way to look at these items in the same way it would be with most other bolt-ons. The OEMs will also claim that the factory design is as good as it gets, but keep in mind that there wouldn't be much of an aftermarket if that were always the case. The OEMs have to take many other factors besides performance into account when designing an intake system. Noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), fuel mileage, production line capabilities, cost effectiveness, and long-term durability are just a few. It's a lot to consider when you really think about it. So good luck if you're considering adding a CAI to your late-model truck!
Non_Sequitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com