The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2011, 05:28 PM   #26
stich626
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hingham ma
Posts: 1,721
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeroadster View Post
A 200 hp slug... well that's a classy statement...

Lets see that high horsepower beast of yours, with the high dollar copper gaskets and the "stage 8" locking bolts.
at the moment it is a 200hp slug

but I have a 355 550hp or the to be built 496 with dart pro1 heads/etc etc/
that I'll be adding those pic as I go to my build

p.s. you can go to photobucket to see all the goodies
bowtie6872

Last edited by stich626; 04-14-2011 at 05:30 PM.
stich626 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 05:35 PM   #27
BIGKEV
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Prescott AZ
Posts: 112
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

I run headers with NO ISSUES. I have headmans with 1 5/8" primary 3" collectors. I run the cheap paper gaskets were the flange meets the head, the trick is to soak the gaskets in water for 30-45 minutes before you install them. You then torque them, run them till the engine is warm, let it cool enough to re-torque. I use safety wire instead of stage 8's cause I'm cheap. and I like the copper collector gaskets, and I use a stover nut as a jamb nut. Another trick if you don't want to fork out for stainless or ceramic is to remove all of the factory rust prevention paint and coat them with Anti-seize. This offers little or no heat saturation reduction, but leaves a nice finish and protects the header from rust/corrosion.
BIGKEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 09:46 PM   #28
Hubscrub
Cruzin
 
Hubscrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on the road
Posts: 2,835
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

I'm not a "i got to have tons of power" kind of guy but i only run manifolds on anything because of no worry with them heck most of the time you don't even need gaskets where they bolt to the heads.
__________________
Lime Wife's 67https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wZEMODaS2d94u8

Back to the Fifties 59 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...NAeStpydfrcj_U

Proverbs 3:5,6

"Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel across the country from coast to coast without seeing anything."Charles Kuralt

In memory of our first baby daughter, daddy and mommy love you.
Danica Grace 6/26/14
Hubscrub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 10:11 PM   #29
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,930
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

The best thing made on the collectors is to find the headers with the "ball and socket" type flanges. No gaskets, and no leaky!

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 10:20 PM   #30
BIGKEV
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Prescott AZ
Posts: 112
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
The best thing made on the collectors is to find the headers with the "ball and socket" type flanges. No gaskets, and no leaky!

Gary
Ball and socket collectors create SO much turbulence that they kill all of the scavenging effect of the header, might as well still be running manifolds. Most shorty headers are also lumped into the same class of problems.
BIGKEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 11:31 PM   #31
treveiger
Senior Member
 
treveiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 4,093
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

How much does a good set of headers run? Or the ram horn manifolds?
__________________
1969 Chevy c20(Miss Hackjob)
treveiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 12:15 AM   #32
BIGKEV
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Prescott AZ
Posts: 112
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by treveiger View Post
How much does a good set of headers run? Or the ram horn manifolds?
That all depends on several factors. I'm the type to wait a little extra time to get what I want for what I want to pay for it. It took me 8 months to find all the parts for my engine, but I spent $600 vs $1200-$1500 if I wouldn't have waited for the "right" deals to come along. Also, what are your goals for your truck, what mods if any have you made?
BIGKEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 01:04 AM   #33
Bad70sbchevy
Registered User
 
Bad70sbchevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Newberry,FL
Posts: 277
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

I run Blackjack tuned headers on my daily driver. Its a built 355 making around 425hp and I've haven't had any heat soak issues what so ever and I'm not running any insulation. Personally, I don't have any issues with the spark plugs too, but I'm running shorter Accel Sparkplugs on it. The motor is a little cold blooded as a result of running headers and the nut will back off about every two months, but thats because of engine flex and the fact the exhaust system is fixed, probably going to buy header bolt locks some time to solve it, but I love them.
Attached Images
 
__________________
1970 Chevrolet C-10 w/355sbc
2010 Silverado Daily Driver
1971 Mercedes 280sl project car

Last edited by Bad70sbchevy; 04-15-2011 at 01:07 AM.
Bad70sbchevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 07:35 AM   #34
mrein3
Registered User
 
mrein3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,253
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

Wow. You guys running headers must spend a lot of time around red line to be getting all these benefits from headers. That must cost a fortune with $3.79 gas.

I stand by my comments. Unless you are running really expensive, well engineered headers for your engine, and then you run around above 4000 rpms ALL THE TIME, you're wasting your time and money on headers.

I'd like to see dyno numbers from a ram's horn engine verses a headers pipe engine for the 0-3000 rpm range - WHERE MOST OF US LIVE.

I bolted my rams horns on my fresh 383 when I installed the engine that I built in December of 2004. I bought the truck in 1994. The only time I had to touch the exhaust in 17 years of ownership is when I put on the Hearthrob dual kit and when I swapped engines in 2004.

Save your time and money.
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205.
'71 Malibu convertible
'72 Malibu hard top
Center City, MN
mrein3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 08:45 AM   #35
stich626
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hingham ma
Posts: 1,721
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrein3 View Post
Wow. You guys running headers must spend a lot of time around red line to be getting all these benefits from headers. That must cost a fortune with $3.79 gas.

I stand by my comments. Unless you are running really expensive, well engineered headers for your engine, and then you run around above 4000 rpms ALL THE TIME, you're wasting your time and money on headers.

I'd like to see dyno numbers from a ram's horn engine verses a headers pipe engine for the 0-3000 rpm range - WHERE MOST OF US LIVE.

I bolted my rams horns on my fresh 383 when I installed the engine that I built in December of 2004. I bought the truck in 1994. The only time I had to touch the exhaust in 17 years of ownership is when I put on the Hearthrob dual kit and when I swapped engines in 2004.

Save your time and money.
well for use guys that drive the trucks that want the extra power starting at 1500rpm and all the way to red line we run good stepped headers..
even at the lower rpm range they allow for a complete cyl fill of burnable gas and air, unlike the ramhorns that force that exhaust port to fight with the other four as that cyl try's to empty..

yes for some headers can be a waste..
but when they are the corectly sized to the engine you get power through the whole range and better mpg because at cruise the engine doesn't have to work as hard , less pumping loss..
to each their own
stich626 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 02:15 PM   #36
BIGKEV
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Prescott AZ
Posts: 112
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrein3 View Post
Wow. You guys running headers must spend a lot of time around red line to be getting all these benefits from headers. That must cost a fortune with $3.79 gas.

I stand by my comments. Unless you are running really expensive, well engineered headers for your engine, and then you run around above 4000 rpms ALL THE TIME, you're wasting your time and money on headers.

I'd like to see dyno numbers from a ram's horn engine verses a headers pipe engine for the 0-3000 rpm range - WHERE MOST OF US LIVE.

I bolted my rams horns on my fresh 383 when I installed the engine that I built in December of 2004. I bought the truck in 1994. The only time I had to touch the exhaust in 17 years of ownership is when I put on the Hearthrob dual kit and when I swapped engines in 2004.

Save your time and money.
I disagree with some of this.

First is your 4000 RPM figure, even at idle your engine can benefit from more exhaust flow. An engine is simply put, an air pump, the more air you can get in and out the more efficient it will be.

Second I'll agree with half of this, the headers do have to be well engineered, but they don't have to be expensive.

Third I have seen dyno results for both first hand, as well as flow bench testing side by side. Headers win in both instances so long as they are properly sized for the application.

Fourth if you take your time and use your head when installing headers they can be just as low maintenance as manifolds.

Bottom line is some motors benefit more from headers then others, I know mine does. Some engines wouldn't benefit enough to justify the price. As with anything you need to match ALL of your parts. I wouldn't put headers on a bone stock motor in most cases, but there are always exceptions.
BIGKEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 03:44 PM   #37
lakeroadster
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

The thing that pretty much puts this argument to rest is new OEM vehicles.... Just about everything now has headers.

Why? Because from a performance standpoint they are superior to cast manifolds.

But lest we forget in "their day" the ram horn style was a huuuuge step forward.

What the General hath created let no man put asunder.

Last edited by lakeroadster; 04-16-2011 at 03:45 PM.
lakeroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 04:23 PM   #38
gonzo6869
Cops, ha, catch me if you can!
 
gonzo6869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 271
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

I have hooker comp that the PO installed and I have no problems with them. Plugs r easy to get out and in. U get what you pay 4, like others said, so if u do decide to get header save it money and do it right.
__________________
72 C-10 Stepper
350/TH350
3.73 in the back
Edelbrock intake and Carb
Hooker Comp Headers
275/60R15 on Rallies

gonzo6869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 02:47 AM   #39
ItsRandy
Registered User
 
ItsRandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Grand Terrace, Ca.
Posts: 1,607
Re: Header or Not To Header That Is The Question

There is a book out there called "Cams, valves and exhaust systems", I think it is by Peterson publishing. It will tell you everything you should know about headers and why headers make horsepower and gas mileage. It tells you which designs will perform where in the RPM range and why. After reading the book you will understand that shorty headers are designed to fit well, not make horsepower and full length headers are designed to make horsepower and fit as well as they can. The proper combination of carb, intake manifold, cam, heads AND headers do the best job and make the most of any engine's potential. Even a mildly built engine can run it's best with the proper combination when tuned properly. You can't expect to get horsepower or gas mileage gains when you bolt on headers designed for high RPM horsepower gains and the rest of the engine is designed for low/midrange RPM torque.
ItsRandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com