The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2014, 03:35 AM   #1
68post
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indpls. , IN
Posts: 795
NP231 strength ?

Is this case good for a 400 to 480 ft lbs smallblock in a '94 scsb K1500 with a manual trans. , ( 3.73 gears and 33's ), ??

edit, I'm not going non-stop mudding, but will ride it hard occasionally somewhere I can cut loose.

Last edited by 68post; 02-08-2014 at 03:42 AM. Reason: more
68post is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 05:19 AM   #2
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: NP231 strength ?

I would pass on a np231 i have seen jeeps with a stock 4.0 blow one apart before.And factory they was only in stuff with no power like a v6 s10 on 6 cylinder jeeps.I would look at a np205 maybe dana 300 both of those are strong t cases and have a good aftermarket.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 11:36 AM   #3
ryanroo
Senior Member
 
ryanroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sw colorado
Posts: 2,720
Re: NP231 strength ?

you should be able to find a 241 that will bolt right in. they are pretty tough cases. came in GM trucks as well.
__________________
72 K20 12v build
72 K20 "parts truck"

ryanroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 09:14 PM   #4
68post
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indpls. , IN
Posts: 795
Re: NP231 strength ?

My truck has a 231 already and was originally a V6 - now a stock '85 350 with a carb and headers. All swapped in before I bought it, along with a nice NV4500 trans. (1994 regular cab short bed K1500)

The high torque engine is and/or was planned for down the road. (407 sbc w/alum heads)

Sounds like I need to find a 241 to swap-in , if possible with my transmission and w/o buying anymore expensive swap parts !

Last edited by 68post; 02-08-2014 at 09:18 PM. Reason: leftouts
68post is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 10:45 PM   #5
franken
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,066
Re: NP231 strength ?

68, how are you liking the NV4500?

Is it a low or high (numerically to save time, or synchro vs non) 1st?
What diff ratio do you have?

Sorry to pepper you w/ rude questions... Bad geek!

I've got a 74 K10 frankentruck w/ an 85 (I think) NP208 and SM465. I'm pretty sure the cab's been swapped and who knows where the motor came from. Add to that the rear end is probably also not original.

I'd imagine an originally I6 truck would have low diff gears. 4:10 or 4:56 perhaps?

Thanks and sorry to butt in!

Last edited by franken; 02-08-2014 at 10:53 PM.
franken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 11:18 PM   #6
68post
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indpls. , IN
Posts: 795
Re: NP231 strength ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by franken View Post
68, how are you liking the NV4500?

Is it a low or high (numerically to save time, or synchro vs non) 1st?
What diff ratio do you have?

Sorry to pepper you w/ rude questions... Bad geek!

I've got a 74 K10 frankentruck w/ an 85 (I think) NP208 and SM465. I'm pretty sure the cab's been swapped and who knows where the motor came from. Add to that the rear end is probably also not original.

I'd imagine an originally I6 truck would have low diff gears. 4:10 or 4:56 perhaps?

Thanks and sorry to butt in!
You are definitely welcome and not butting-in.

The truck was built with 3.73 gears and a 4.3 V6 ( I believe the model would be a "Sport". no chrome but all black trim, grille, and bumpers) I really don't remember if I'd ever bothered to nail down which transmission version ( I didn't install it either), don't think it has a extra low granny and no I don't think it's synchronized.

I wish it had 4.10's or even better 4.56's , but then first gear in high range is too low and low range becomes ridiculously too low.
It is a great trans , and I had the same trans in a 2000 3500HD and it was perfect for that app.
68post is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com