The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2014, 07:03 PM   #1
NEWFISHER
Registered User
 
NEWFISHER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,303
For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

When you did your build and were on the fence buying another tank, internal pump sender etc. and you chose the simpler route aka the external mount....have you been happy with it, too noisey etc? I have built a few rock crawlers and although never really concearned with pump noise, I have always insulated the band clamps well enough that I could never hear the pump over the sound of the Swampers when driving to the trail head LOL!
Just starting my shopping list on a return style system 2003 5.3 and thinking of taking the easy way and going external for a 1946 Suburban build.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
NEWFISHER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 12:24 AM   #2
Blackpony
Registered User
 
Blackpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Aubrey, TX
Posts: 308
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I used a bosch external and with just a small amount of insulation it was about as loud as any other factory truck out there.
Blackpony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 02:12 AM   #3
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

You can't hear much over my exhaust, so the pump wasn't an issue. I went external for its ease-of-access and ability to clean and change on the fly. Its also easier to upgrade to a high-hp unit like an A1000.

The only downside I see is that even with a small sump and some tank foam, if I'm down to 1/3 tank, I can slosh fuel hard enough to misfire if I take a HARD turn. I don't road race, but for an autocrosser it could be a downer. Some baffling would solve it as well, thats really the only thing I've noticed.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 10:38 AM   #4
Low Elco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indep, MO
Posts: 5,893
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Everyone I've talked to says internal, if you can get away with it. S10's have a nice flat tank top for a good mount ring, and you just cut the stands on a truck bucket down to what you need and go from there. '98-02 V8 Camaro setups seem to be internally regulated in the bucket, I read somewhere, simplifying things further. If you have vertical clearance and a decent flat spot on your tank top, easy peasy.
Low Elco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 12:57 PM   #5
Custom 68
Registered User
 
Custom 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,928
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I was external for a few years off a poly Blazer tank when I first did the swap. The noise was not a problem. I know a pump does a better job pushing the fuel rather than sucking it out then pushing it. I was concerned that it would also get hotter. I was coming back from a an 800 mile trip running pretty hard thru the heat of the day when it went out. I coasted down an off ramp and after it cooled it limped it home stopping a few times to let it cool. It took longer of course but I made it. I swapped it out but knew it could always be a problem When I saved up I got a Boyds tank with an internal pump, all the new ones are internal so there is a reason for that. External worked for me for years and did great but I was always concerned.
If you could I would go internal but either is proven to work.
Good luck
David
__________________
Dave
1968 Custom Chevy with turbo charged 5.3 gen III 4l80e swap
1967-71 GMC 3/4 ton long step 4x4 (not sure what year exactly?)
"A good friend will bail you out of jail...but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying "that was frekin awesome".
"If it doesn't fit force it...If it breaks then it needed to be replaced anyway!"
Custom 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 01:42 PM   #6
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Mines located on the frame next to the tank so it has to pull a little, but mostly is pushing like a tank mounted pump. They are certainly noisier this way... but my walbro255 is over 3 yrs old now but has only 1000mi or so.
__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 09:36 PM   #7
NEWFISHER
Registered User
 
NEWFISHER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,303
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Thanks for the help guys!
LowElco I will check out the s10 and the F body stuff.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
NEWFISHER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 12:49 PM   #8
Low Elco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indep, MO
Posts: 5,893
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

You got it- there's pics of what I did on the Yeller thread.
Low Elco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 07:07 PM   #9
ivorton74
Registered User
 
ivorton74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 916
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

ive got a walbro 355 in mine on the inside of the frame right by the tank. its actually not that loud at all. when the truck is idling u can hardly hear it. its been almost a month and so far so good
__________________
1983 C10 Silverado 5.3 swap
1974 C10 lwb 5.3 swap(sold)...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/board/sh...d.php?t=614122
2001 BMW 530i 5 speed
2019 Nissan Titan SV Midnight
1979 Datsun 210 4 door
1980 Datsun 120y(back home in Trinidad)
ivorton74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 08:06 PM   #10
Indian113
Registered User
 
Indian113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Monroe,Iowa
Posts: 4,370
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I have over 7000 miles on my cheapy pump and regulator I bought from Speedway. I haven't had any problems yet! Yes it's a little Noisy but my stereo and exhaust covers it for me. I like the fact it's mounted to my frame and I can get at it easy to change. If Needed.
Indian113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 08:23 AM   #11
Clyde65
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
 
Clyde65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,540
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I have a not so cheap pump ( Pierburg, came on Mercedes vehicles), it has lasted about 5K miles and 4 years, so IMO it has been better than some of the options available in 2009 when I started building the motor/trans combo.

They have gotten better IMO over the last few years.

Mine isnt noticeable at all except at start up, there is a slight whine when it turns on and forces fuel, then I start it.
__________________
Clyde65

Rebuild of Clyde
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184

69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684



support our troops!
Clyde65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 08:37 AM   #12
chuckmc8
It's alsways something.....
 
chuckmc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Douglasville GA
Posts: 1,171
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I use Airtex E2000 from Advance Auto. Mounts on the frame- Ive done a bunch and had no problems with them. I wouldnt put one in the tank myself. These are quiet and work well
__________________
1968 RS Camaro 'Vert Matching number 327 and M21 Muncie
1968 C10 Black with red interior and orig paint. 5.3 / 4l60e,3:73 POSI 17" Torq Thrusts
1968 CST 514 Red with black interior. Buddy Buckets, Factory A/C, PS, PB- 20" AR custom shop TT, 5.3 and 4l60e
chuckmc8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 11:03 AM   #13
Matt Cramer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Covington, GA
Posts: 386
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BR3W CITY View Post
The only downside I see is that even with a small sump and some tank foam, if I'm down to 1/3 tank, I can slosh fuel hard enough to misfire if I take a HARD turn. I don't road race, but for an autocrosser it could be a downer. Some baffling would solve it as well, thats really the only thing I've noticed.
I have the same issue with an in-tank pump. The stock fuel tank isn't very well baffled.
__________________
Matt Cramer
1972 Chevy C10 - 4.8 swap, long bed, and maybe one dent free body panel somewhere - SOLD
4.8 LS build thread
Matt Cramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 01:12 AM   #14
Gooker928
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Houston, tx
Posts: 99
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I used the 225 on my 78 and it has held up for two years and 10000 miles.
The Engine will bog down when cornering hard and accelerating hard when below 1/4 full.
Gooker928 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 04:00 AM   #15
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooker928 View Post
I used the 225 on my 78 and it has held up for two years and 10000 miles.
The Engine will bog down when cornering hard and accelerating hard when below 1/4 full.
this thread was like 6months old lol. Your pump does that because the tank isn't sumped, or baffled, depending on the exact symptoms. You can try to use tank foam to quell that.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 04:16 AM   #16
scottybaccus
Registered User
 
scottybaccus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Hutto
Posts: 109
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

You'll be best served by an in-tank pump, with OE baffling. RockAuto sells tanks for '87+ models for under $100, and efi pickup assemblies, '87+ as well, for under $100. Add a Walbro 255 lph high pressure pump, and an external filter with the OE return type rails and regulator. You get OE reliable for a great price.
The blazer guys can choose from 25 or 31 gallons, and the swb guys can have dual tanks with the '87 tank selector valve. It's rated 75 psi.
__________________
Scotty Baccus
scottybaccus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 05:52 AM   #17
ls1nova71
Registered User
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Independence Mo
Posts: 4,118
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I would have to say intank is the best method too, but if that's not an option, its really hard to beat a nicely sumped tank. I can drive my 71 with factory in cab sumped tank on E for a long time and never get any starvation problems. They do have their drawbacks, changing the pump or filter could be messy if the tank is full, but for no more than I do that I'll deal with it.
__________________
My '72 short bed build. http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...6-0-4l80e.html

5.3 swap into my RUSTY '71 C10
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversion...71-c-10-a.html
ls1nova71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 11:13 AM   #18
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

When I do a swap (probably 4.8 or 5.3), I'm planning on buying an 87+ Blazer 31 gallon tank. They fit on LWB right? In between the frame rails seems like a much better place than hanging low on the side like my current one.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 12:40 PM   #19
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotard View Post
When I do a swap (probably 4.8 or 5.3), I'm planning on buying an 87+ Blazer 31 gallon tank. They fit on LWB right? In between the frame rails seems like a much better place than hanging low on the side like my current one.
I used that tank in my K-10. It would have been pretty close to the rear diff, if not for the lift.

Might be ok if you move it back a bit though. I didn't want to relocate the last crossmember.

EDIT: Just saw you have a square-body. Not sure how it would fit on your truck...but maybe the pics will still help.





__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2016 Ford Explorer Sport - Twin Turbskis
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 12:51 PM   #20
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Damn, springs that arched can't ride well... why didn't you go shackle flip instead?
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:11 PM   #21
Andy4639
Old member
 
Andy4639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Liberty, & Garden City S.C. , U.S.
Posts: 19,936
Lightbulb Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

I've had EFI since 1989 and had in tank pumps the whole time. # of them to be exact.
First one I learned I needed a tank with baffles. It lasted maybe a year are 2. Sucking air is the worst thing you can have one do. All the sloshing around and needle going all over the place drove me crazy.

Second one last for several years. The last one which I had to replace when I did the LS swap had been in for over 10 years.
INtank is by far the best way to go.
__________________
1971 LWB Custom, 6.0LS & 4L80E, Speedhut.com GPS speedometer & gauges with A/C. 20" Boss 338's Grey wheels 4 wheel disc brakes. My Driver
Seeing the USA in a 71


Upstate SC GM Truck Club
2013,14 and 2016 Hot Rod Pour Tour


http://upstategmtrucks.com/



Get out and drive the truck this summer and have some fun!
It sucks not being able to hear!

LWB trucks rule, if you don't think so measure your SWB!
After talking to tech support at Air Lift I have found out that the kit I need is 60811. Per the measurements I gave them. Ride height of truck inside spring and inside diameter of springs.
Andy4639 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:43 PM   #22
ls1nova71
Registered User
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Independence Mo
Posts: 4,118
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wasted Income View Post
I used that tank in my K-10. It would have been pretty close to the rear diff, if not for the lift.

Did that tank fit by just trimming/removing part of the bed floor rail? Or did you put any kind of body lift on it? I'd like to go with a bigger tank than the Blazer tank on my next truck.
__________________
My '72 short bed build. http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...6-0-4l80e.html

5.3 swap into my RUSTY '71 C10
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversion...71-c-10-a.html
ls1nova71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:44 PM   #23
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotard View Post
Damn, springs that arched can't ride well... why didn't you go shackle flip instead?
It's not bad. It's a Skyjacker Softride. Supposedly the best riding 4" lift.
__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2016 Ford Explorer Sport - Twin Turbskis
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:51 PM   #24
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ls1nova71 View Post
Did that tank fit by just trimming/removing part of the bed floor rail? Or did you put any kind of body lift on it? I'd like to go with a bigger tank than the Blazer tank on my next truck.
That bed floor support was cut out a long time ago, in another life for a poly blazer tank. Once that is done, it fit great with no body lift.
__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2016 Ford Explorer Sport - Twin Turbskis
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:55 PM   #25
ls1nova71
Registered User
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Independence Mo
Posts: 4,118
Re: For those running external: Do you wish you would have gone internal pump?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wasted Income View Post
That bed floor support was cut out a long time ago, in another life for a poly blazer tank. Once that is done, it fit great with no body lift.
Cool, I may have to give this a shot next time!
__________________
My '72 short bed build. http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...6-0-4l80e.html

5.3 swap into my RUSTY '71 C10
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversion...71-c-10-a.html
ls1nova71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com