The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2016, 02:52 PM   #1
Lugnutz65
Registered User
 
Lugnutz65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,926
Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

If you have disc front and drum rear, what hard line are you running to the rear wheel cylinders? 1/4" or 3/16"?

I'm about to plumb new hard line. I'm keeping my original 1965 rear drums. I'm nearly 100% sure my rear drums have the stock setup with 3/16" hard line running back from the common 1/4" front drum line.

Has anyone switched their rear drums to 1/4" line? My new front disc brakes will be 3/16" line. The MC uses a 1/4" line for the rear brakes and I was thinking of switching the rear drums to 1/4".
__________________
My 65 C10 build: www.lugnutz65chevystepside.weebly.com

Want to know more about T5 transmissions? My website has a T5 Info Page and a Step by Step T5 rebuild.
Lugnutz65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 04:06 PM   #2
scoot_mcgrute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tigard, Or
Posts: 503
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

I did factory replacement lines down the frame and on the axle and they are 1/4" on the frame and 3/16" from the tee fitting to the wheel cylinders. I'm running a 1" Wilwood master, 1/4" to the front calipers as well and seems to have good pedal thus far. I'll find out for real when I get it on the road soon
__________________
1966 Army Truck
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691778
scoot_mcgrute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 08:51 PM   #3
canadian_diesel1964
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Belmont Ontario Canada
Posts: 418
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

I have the 96 blazer set up and I'm 1/4 to 3/16 in the rear...3/16 to 3/16 split to front...worked great
canadian_diesel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 08:54 PM   #4
canadian_diesel1964
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Belmont Ontario Canada
Posts: 418
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

By the way Lugnutz I'm dropping my T 5 in next week...the clutch is in..thank you your blog helped me a ton!
canadian_diesel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 09:05 PM   #5
jayoldschool
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
Posts: 2,156
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

My 65 was 3/16 from the front to all the way to the back. Don't think it will make a difference once you start swapping components. Just make sure you have your lines connected correctly.
jayoldschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2016, 12:07 AM   #6
vetnat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Moose Jaw, SK
Posts: 510
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

1961 GMC - I'm in the process of doing disc conversion on the front, keeping the drums in the rear. I have figured: 3/16 to the front discs, 1/4 from proportioning valve to rear brake hose, then 3/16 to wheel cylinders. Strange thing is, I ordered replacement rear axle brake lines from Classic Industries, and they sent 1/4", which does not fit. Waiting to hear from customer service.
__________________
1961 GMC half ton, short step, Canadian model. Just starting work on it.
vetnat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2016, 01:47 PM   #7
Lugnutz65
Registered User
 
Lugnutz65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,926
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoot_mcgrute View Post
I did factory replacement lines down the frame and on the axle and they are 1/4" on the frame and 3/16" from the tee fitting to the wheel cylinders. I'm running a 1" Wilwood master, 1/4" to the front calipers as well and seems to have good pedal thus far. I'll find out for real when I get it on the road soon
The 1/4" to your front calipers may be unique to your calipers and booster. My CPP kit uses the very common early Chevy calipers. The CPP supplied brake hoses will only accept 3/16" line. Can't make 1/4" fit the front brake hoses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by canadian_diesel1964 View Post
I have the 96 blazer set up and I'm 1/4 to 3/16 in the rear...3/16 to 3/16 split to front...worked great
I will likely end up with the same setup. Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by canadian_diesel1964 View Post
By the way Lugnutz I'm dropping my T 5 in next week...the clutch is in..thank you your blog helped me a ton!
I'm always happy to help. Glad my BLOG pages were useful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayoldschool View Post
My 65 was 3/16 from the front to all the way to the back. Don't think it will make a difference once you start swapping components. Just make sure you have your lines connected correctly.
I intend to examine a 1995 Chevy blazer rear brake line at the backing plate to see if it's 1/4" line or 3/16". Under the Blazer hood, everything runs through the PV and then into a block which I assume is for antilock brakes. Anyway, if the Blazer uses 1/4" to connect to the rear wheel cylinders then I might try to go that way too. I'd need to use wheel cylinders designed for 1/4" since I know mine are designed fro 3/16".

Quote:
Originally Posted by vetnat View Post
1961 GMC - I'm in the process of doing disc conversion on the front, keeping the drums in the rear. I have figured: 3/16 to the front discs, 1/4 from proportioning valve to rear brake hose, then 3/16 to wheel cylinders. Strange thing is, I ordered replacement rear axle brake lines from Classic Industries, and they sent 1/4", which does not fit. Waiting to hear from customer service.
This should work fine, especially with a PV in the system. However, if the PV was only designed for 1/4" line to the rear drums, then having 3/16" line mixed in will change the pressure that the PV sees. As I think about it, if there is 3/16" line anywhere in the rear brake line, then it's just like the whole line is 3/16". A 3/16" line has higher pressure than a 1/4" line which means that the PV will open earlier in the pedal stroke.

So I'm really only concerned about the rear brake line circuit. I'm concerned that if I use 3/16" line in the circuit with a PV that was intended to only have 1/4" line, then the PV will not likely function as well as it should.
__________________
My 65 C10 build: www.lugnutz65chevystepside.weebly.com

Want to know more about T5 transmissions? My website has a T5 Info Page and a Step by Step T5 rebuild.
Lugnutz65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2016, 02:58 PM   #8
vetnat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Moose Jaw, SK
Posts: 510
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

Interesting point, I agree 3/16 line anywhere in the circuit makes it like all 3/16 line. I'm not sure why the line going to the rear is 1/4, and then the rear axle line in 3/16. I'm using the proportioning valve out of a 1979 K-10, anyone know what diameter the rear axle line is in those trucks?
__________________
1961 GMC half ton, short step, Canadian model. Just starting work on it.
vetnat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2016, 05:39 PM   #9
scoot_mcgrute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tigard, Or
Posts: 503
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lugnutz65 View Post
The 1/4" to your front calipers may be unique to your calipers and booster. My CPP kit uses the very common early Chevy calipers. The CPP supplied brake hoses will only accept 3/16" line. Can't make 1/4" fit the front brake hoses.
For a frame of reference, I found that 65 used 3/16" lines while 66 was upped to 1/4". I bought the full brake line kit for the truck and set it up to work with the manual Wilwood master. I don't remember any adapters into the front hoses for the CPP disc brake setup but I did buy adapters, 3/8-24 male to 7/16-20 female, for a few other places in the system.
__________________
1966 Army Truck
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691778
scoot_mcgrute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2016, 10:51 PM   #10
racecougar
Registered User
 
racecougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Imperial, MO
Posts: 999
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

I'm running 1/4" down the frame to the rear brake hose, then 3/16" from the tee on the axle to the wheel cylinders.
__________________
Rod @ AzzKicker Cars
1965 C10 SWB - Build Thread
racecougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2016, 01:59 AM   #11
vetnat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Moose Jaw, SK
Posts: 510
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

Found this post over on the square body forums. It appears that those trucks had 1/4 line splitting into 3/16 for the rear. So, if using a proportioning valve made for a square body truck, should be golden.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1984Silverado4x4 View Post
These trucks use 1/4 in steel line along the frame rail. When it splits at the rear axle to go to the two wheels its 3/16 steel line.

Dont know what length you need. I just bought a couple of pre flared lines and if I needed any more just went back to the parts store and got what length I thought I needed.

A little warning with the pre flared lines though.
I replaced all the brake lines front to back on a teachers truck and every single one of the connections leaked because the second flare was bad so I had to reflare the lines myself.

The other trucks that Ive done I just bought a roll of brake line and cut and flared it myself.
__________________
1961 GMC half ton, short step, Canadian model. Just starting work on it.
vetnat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2016, 09:47 PM   #12
Lugnutz65
Registered User
 
Lugnutz65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,926
Re: Question for those with front disc and rear drum.

Just an update for those who are following this thread.

I went to the salvage yard today and confirmed a few things about the 1995 Blazer brakes. The Blazer uses a 1/4" line from the MC to the PV and then to the antilock mechanism box. Then more 1/4" line along the frame rail to the rear brake hose. Then it changes to 3/16" from the brake hose to the rear drums. The Blazer front brake circuit is all 3/16".

Why all the fuss? Well I just wanted to make sure the Blazer PV would function properly since I plan to keep my 3/16" brake lines that are currently on my 1965 C10.
__________________
My 65 C10 build: www.lugnutz65chevystepside.weebly.com

Want to know more about T5 transmissions? My website has a T5 Info Page and a Step by Step T5 rebuild.
Lugnutz65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com