The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


View Poll Results: Do you favor Classic Carb'd Muscle, or Modern EFI LS Power
Give me that gas guzzling classic muscle 79 63.71%
I don't want to pump the gas, give me modern EFI LS Power 37 29.84%
You guys are missing out, I like something all together different (explain in post below) 8 6.45%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2017, 11:16 AM   #1
DBK81
Registered User
 
DBK81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 357
Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I'm not sure where my stance is on the above question, currently in my '72 I have a ZZ4 350 fueled by a Edelbrock 1411 Performer series 750, backed by a TH400, it's great combo and allot of fun for Sunday cruising and around the City. But there is something to be said about the modern fuel injected LS power plants and 5 speed transmissions.

So where do you stand? Classic Carb'd muscle, or Modern LS Power? Or are you somewhere different all together?
__________________
1972 C10 - It might be old, but it's not slow

Last edited by DBK81; 03-31-2017 at 03:35 PM.
DBK81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 11:35 AM   #2
James the III
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: lowell ma
Posts: 750
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

For me, I like to K.I.S.S.
but there is something to be said for mixing ole school big inch engine with modern efi..
I can find better things to spend 3k on than a efi set up tho.. and those 500-999 buck tbi's are not going to cut it on a healthy engine..
James the III is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 12:03 PM   #3
Sweeet67
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Posts: 233
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I just finished installing a new fitech on my 67 gmc. It's got a brand new 383 with a fairly healthy cam and10.5 to 1 compression. Only about 75 miles on it so far, but I'm thinking I should have done this a long time ago. Running like a champ, and it really woke up the throttle response.
I'm just gonna go thru tires a lot faster now!
Sweeet67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 12:19 PM   #4
hamjet
Registered User
 
hamjet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Westerlo, New York
Posts: 1,325
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

It's cool having either carb or efi basic sbc, or bbc if that's what you want, but if you've seen one you've seen a thousand. I have to go outside the norm. I'm not looking for high HP, drag racing, neck snapping race car, (or an over weight truck), if I were I'd get a very small, light vehicle. but I love these trucks, so, I guess I fall under 'something all together different, gas guzzling, ancient classic???
__________________
Thanks, Joe..
1969 C/10, 348 C.I., 3X2 bbl. V8, 2004r , LWB.
hamjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 12:47 PM   #5
weq92f
Registered User
 
weq92f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 3,157
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Previous owner put in an MSD Atomic EFI/TBI system with regulated, return fuel system. He spent nearly 3 grand total in parts alone.

Was it worth it? For him, likely not, but for me ( he ate the cost ), you bet. This motor starts first time every time.

1970 BBC 4-bolt, 1969 cast #063 heads and 2016 EFI.

-klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi
07 335 sport turbo 6sp
94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs
99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold
73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend
68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold
weq92f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 02:16 PM   #6
In The Ten Ring
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 6,421
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

My truck has the original 250 and I am perfectly happy with that. If that ever goes out and cannot be fixed (rod goes through block?) then I wan an original 292.

If I ever get another antique vehicle I want it to have the original engine also.
In The Ten Ring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 02:36 PM   #7
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

If money were no object, hook me up with a supercharged 6.2L backed with a 6 spd manual anyday.

But money is an object, one I'm not good at holding onto for very long, so old school gen 1 350's with a carb is what I roll.
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 02:54 PM   #8
Malo83
Cruzzzn' Vet
 
Malo83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Porterville,Ca.
Posts: 1,918
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Here in Cali with my 83 the only legal upgrade is the E-Rod LS3 6.2, so for me LS Power is in my future.
Malo83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 02:59 PM   #9
RustyBucket
Registered User
 
RustyBucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Space Coast, Fl.
Posts: 1,050
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Both my old trucks are carbureted (Holley). BB Blazer has a 750 vac & SB GMC has a 600 vac secondary. Both engines are mild, start & run good, don't use oil or load plugs. Both idle a little rich and sting your eyes. Both trucks have OD transmissions and cruise comfortably at interstate speed. Fuel mileage is passable. Both are kinda fun to drive. I appreciate the technology of the modern power but not worth the work & expense for me to repower. I'm OLD and probably won't live long enough to wear my old engines out.

P.S. weq92f.. I have a set of fresh #063 casting heads. Big valves and some nicely done bowl blending. Think it would be worth the trouble to swap out the #236 peanut ports on the Blazer? 2 bolt 454+.40 flat top pistons.
__________________
Dad always said, "Son, WISH IN ONE HAND, and ......."
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Current toy trucks:
'71 GMC 1500 SUPER CUSTOM short/step, orig. dk. blue, 350/700r, ps,pb, A/C
'72 Blazer 2wd, ochre & white, 454, tremecTKO 500 5spd. ps, pb, A/C, tilt

Last 10yrs of hobby vehicles, had a FEW more in the 50yrs. before these:
'66 Plymouth Belvedere City of Miami cop car clone.
'70 Nova 406"sb, 13.5-1, solid roller, Brodix, p.glide/t.brake, back halved, 9" Ford, spool 4.88, cage,ladder bar/coilover, 10.5 tire....... SOLD!!
'67 C10 short/step side mount spare -- SOLD!!
'72 Jimmy 2wd, 350/350, ps, pb, fun driver, lots of bondo & a shiny red paint job..... SOLD!!
'69 Nova 350, 4spd, A/C, ps, p.b, ...SOLD!!
RustyBucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 03:01 PM   #10
GRX
Registered User
 
GRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,937
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Old school for me. Right down to the 1-bbl and point ignition
__________________
1969 c-10 Step Side Long Bed. I-6 250cid = = 1969 Pontiac GTO hard top. 400, 4-speed.
GRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 03:13 PM   #11
JustToxic
Registered User
 
JustToxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 292
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I like the original style stuff or old school muscle over the LS. For my project, I'm putting a 383 Stroker that will be ran off of E85. Carb at first and then I'll switch it over to EFI down the road. With the amount of aftermarket fuel delivery systems out there it is a lot easier to keep the older stuff running without having to put an LS in. Don't get me wrong the LS is a heck of a engine.
__________________
1967 Chevy C20 to K20 Conversion "Simply Toxic"
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=749409

1971 Chevy C20 Custom Camper LS Swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=763775
JustToxic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 03:19 PM   #12
robs71
Senior Member
 
robs71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Reading,Pa.
Posts: 440
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

If I ever get another antique vehicle I want it to have the original engine also.[/QUOTE]

I feel the same way,my kids 68 short bed has a great running 250 in it,he can't wait to put an LS motor in it but it is his preference.My panel has a 250 in it and I love it..Car in my avatar has a 64 block in it and is carbureted.In high school I grew up around early iron and I have always enjoyed carbureted cars and trucks..i like um when they have pretty much what they were born with not a hybrid.i vote Classic Muscle.....
__________________
robs71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 04:00 PM   #13
darrellyates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Gallatin TN
Posts: 376
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Everyone has an opinion. My grandpa said opinions are like rear ends... everybody has one. So, guess I'll show mine off a little...

If my truck was original, I would keep the small block and carb. Mine isn't. I like to drive them, usually just when I feel like it. The LS and port fuel injection is the way I'm building mine. The computer and port fuel injection, is the best thing that every happened to the internal combustion engine. They last longer, stay in tune, make good power, and require very little upkeep. So for me, LS is the way to go...
Attached Images
 
darrellyates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 04:10 PM   #14
mattfranklin
Senior Member
 
mattfranklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 812
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I'm trying to follow 1970 LT-1 (Corvette or Z-28) specs for my 350 rebuild. If not exact NOS parts, then at least equivalent replacements parts.
__________________
(Very) Slow-Going Build Thread: Stock 1970 Short Step with Stock 1970 LT-1

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=567340
mattfranklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 05:10 PM   #15
i82much
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 313
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Once you get a carb and distributor dialed in, you aren't giving all that much up compared to EFI. It's things like having a working vacuum advance, functional heat crossover, thermal air cleaner, etc., that make a carbureted car a nice daily driver.

My 1972 K10 has a 1966 396 with 702 closed chamber heads on it and a carburetor. My 2016 2500HD has a fuel injected 6.0 LS engine. Both engines are in the right trucks, as far as I am concerned, and I wouldn't want it any other way.
i82much is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 05:12 PM   #16
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Since I'm an old classic, and I drove these trucks when they were new. At the time, that was the state of the art automotive technology. My 69 has been running just fine with a carburated small block engine for 48 years, so I see no reason to change it now.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 08:45 PM   #17
garyd1961
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

If I wanted a modern truck I would have bought one. I went to a lot of trouble finding an old truck to fix up and anything but an old school motor with a carb wouldn't be right under my hood. It doesn't have to be factory just old school.
garyd1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 09:09 PM   #18
46stude
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Rockport, Texas
Posts: 192
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Modern stuff is for them that can't work on 'em. LOL

I love the Q-Jet & 350 in my Cheyenne. If I get the "urge" to drive modern, I can get in my '01 Silverado. Night & day difference between the two, just as the creator meant it to be.....
46stude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 09:17 PM   #19
TXBoudy
Registered User
 
TXBoudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 181
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Both! For me it comes down to drivability. The LS is much more drivable with higher HP than old school. Mine's to be a regular driver and I have a SB400, wish I had an LS.
TXBoudy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 09:24 PM   #20
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 46stude View Post
Modern stuff is for them that can't work on 'em. LOL

I love the Q-Jet & 350 in my Cheyenne. If I get the "urge" to drive modern, I can get in my '01 Silverado. Night & day difference between the two, just as the creator meant it to be.....
I can work on old AND new. Everyone should. If you (not you personally, a hypothetical you) don't know what the hanger in a Q-Jet is for, how can you sleep at night? And if you don't know how to change your fan set point with a laptop, same thing...

I don't claim to be an "expert" on either, but know enough to be dangerous and keep my car out of the hands of the actual experts in most cases.
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 09:25 PM   #21
weq92f
Registered User
 
weq92f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 3,157
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBucket View Post
P.S. weq92f.. I have a set of fresh #063 casting heads. Big valves and some nicely done bowl blending. Think it would be worth the trouble to swap out the #236 peanut ports on the Blazer? 2 bolt 454+.40 flat top pistons.
Those are some nice heads. Probably couldn't hurt to put them in there!

-klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi
07 335 sport turbo 6sp
94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs
99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold
73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend
68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold
weq92f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:01 PM   #22
1972RedNeck
Registered User
 
1972RedNeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Townsend MT
Posts: 1,725
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

6BT Cummins. Simple and 400 HP and 800 - 1000 ft lbs. of torque doesn't take too much to get and 20+ MPG all adds up to make it a no-brainer.

Don't knock it 'till you try it...
__________________
1966 F250 4X4 416
1972 K20 350 4 OTF
Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
I once pulled an intake manifold for a cam swap... ended up with a full on drag car that ran in the 11's.
1972RedNeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:02 PM   #23
ElKotze
Registered User
 
ElKotze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Southwest Kansas
Posts: 306
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I love classic iron because they are like a trip back in time. I hold on to my skinny steering wheel, glance at analog gauges, pump the throttle to set my choke and off I go. And I gladly take on the challenge that with a little maintenance they are just as reliable as a modern vehicle. As a matter of fact I am actually planning to go the entire Route 66 in my old, carbureted truck.
I agree, the LS is probably the best engine GM ever build. But I like old trucks because I want to get away from all that digital crap.
__________________
'64 C10 LWB, 283, 5speed
'68 C20 LWB, 327, 4speed
'69 C20 Custom Camper Longhorn, 350, 4speed
'72 C20 Cheyenne Super, 396, TH400
'66 C60, 292, 4speed

Last edited by ElKotze; 03-29-2017 at 06:34 PM.
ElKotze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2017, 10:54 PM   #24
dmjlambert
Senior Member
 
dmjlambert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,814
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I like the plain ole 350 it came with paired with Quadrajet like it came with, both rebuilt to work with modern gas. Minor upgrades such as HEI and electric choke.
dmjlambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2017, 12:13 AM   #25
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,598
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck View Post
6BT Cummins. Simple and 400 HP and 800 - 1000 ft lbs. of torque doesn't take too much to get and 20+ MPG all adds up to make it a no-brainer.

Don't knock it 'till you try it...
I love those numbers! I worked on farm tractors back in the mid-'70s, and can't stand the smell of diesel, as fuel or exhaust, though, sadly. I'd do it in a heartbeat, if I could stand the smell. YMMV.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com