The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


View Poll Results: Do you favor Classic Carb'd Muscle, or Modern EFI LS Power
Give me that gas guzzling classic muscle 79 63.71%
I don't want to pump the gas, give me modern EFI LS Power 37 29.84%
You guys are missing out, I like something all together different (explain in post below) 8 6.45%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2017, 12:51 PM   #1
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,978
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBK81 View Post
I'm not sure where my stance is on the above question, currently in my '72 I have a ZZ4 350 fueled by a Edelbrock double pumper 750, backed by a TH400, it's great combo and allot of fun for Sunday cruising and around the City. But there is something to be said about the modern fuel injected LS power plants and 5 speed transmissions.

So where do you stand? Classic Carb'd muscle, or Modern LS Power? Or are you somewhere different all together?
I'm just curious when Edelbrock made a double pumper carb?



Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2017, 03:36 PM   #2
DBK81
Registered User
 
DBK81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 357
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
I'm just curious when Edelbrock made a double pumper carb?



Gary
I have no idea what you're talking about, I never wrote such jibberish
__________________
1972 C10 - It might be old, but it's not slow
DBK81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2017, 08:40 PM   #3
Overdriven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 598
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

Personally I would love to keep my 67 old school. I love the 250 6cyl 3OTT for putting around town. But it's not as comfy on the highway as a v8 in overdrive is. I'd love to build a 406 sbc or a big inch bbc but it gets pricey when your goal is 600hp and you want a manual trans to back it up. It won't sound quite as nice but a junkyard LS with a turbo will get me better mileage and for less cost.
Overdriven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2017, 01:32 AM   #4
trac209
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,107
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I'm a fan of simple vehicles that have that old charm and cool factor that a original style engine provides. Is a few extra mpg worth it to you to do the swap? My truck gets used enough and really isn't great on gas but it's not my only vehicle by a stretch so it's not an issue. Anyone saying that it's a reliability thing sure the LS do have that touch of key anytime starting and smooth running. So do my carbed vehicles 99.9 percent of the time. If I need a LS powered truck I can buy one that I can abuse and will have zero issues worrying about for half of what it would cost to have my truck to run one. Plus no offence to LS owners but it really isn't the most visually appealing engine under the hood of a classic either.
trac209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2017, 02:39 AM   #5
burnin oil
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 1,921
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

It all depends what you want out of the truck. I am old school and prefer a built SB with a big holley that will easily spin 7k RPM, others prefer BB power and the superior heads. My current DD. The LS motors are awesome power producers with great gas mileage potential but lack the low end power of the older gen 1 motors. Not a big deal unless its a hard used work truck. Personally once I retire, my K20 is getting a better resto and 700+ HP Cummins with a 6spd manual between the rails. Great MPG and low end grunt for getting around in the woods for getting fire wood, hauling trailers, and still being a blast to drive. Its all on your needs and desires. Sure if you have seen a small block they haven't changed but then again at this point you can say the same for an LS. Unfortunatly chrome doesn't make any of them any faster. I just wish someone would make good flowing exhaust manifolds for a SB like the LS swap cast iron manifolds. I can afford to loose a few HP for something that seals and rams horns do not fit raised port exhaust ports very well.
burnin oil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2017, 08:30 PM   #6
nikwho
Registered User
 
nikwho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 974
Re: Classic Muscle or Modern Power?

I fall into the equation as being a lover of old school big block power, with EFI. While I appreciate the simplicity of how the rolled off the line as well as the turn key, drive cross country reliability of the new LS stuff, I personally like that my truck is old and like to keep it as such. So, with my '68 GMC C15, I've opted to build an all forged, solid roller cam 433" big block with FiTech MeanStreet EFI. Still looks like an old engine in an old truck, but has some conveniences that have come with technology. Itd be a little more friendly and "set it and forget it" reliable with a hydraulic roller, I guess. Mostly, like that everyone likes their truck a little differently! I like seeing what each guy comes up with on where he wants his truck to fall on the sliding scale.
__________________
'59 Apache - 383" SBC/TH-350
'68 GMC - BBC/TH400
nikwho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com