The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2020, 12:34 PM   #1
greenweenie1969
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Hanford, California
Posts: 18
Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

Hey all! I have a 383 stroker crate motor on my 1969 c20 2wd. I have upgraded to front and rear disc brakes from the original drum brakes. I was speaking with another customer of the same engine builder about our setups and he said he had issues with low vacuum pressure do to the larger cam they put in the engines. I spoke with the builder about this and they said it produces 16-19 psi. So I am wondering if that will be enough?

If it is not, what are some better options for master cylinder/booster setups? I planned on replacing the original anyways as this is a frame off so I want to get the proper setup.

Thanks.
greenweenie1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2020, 12:48 PM   #2
jessemthompson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 958
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

16-19 psi is enough for power brakes. If you’re still concerned though, you can always go with a hydroboost system. Aftermarket they are expensive, but you can piece your own together for a very reasonable price. The hydroboost creates a lot more pressure than power brakes as well.
jessemthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2020, 12:49 PM   #3
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,615
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

You got some specs on your crate?
How much vacuum did the other customer have?
The engine builders numbers are pure speculation. All depends on motor tune, timing spot on, rings and valves seated, cam specs etc.
Normally minimum could be 14 hg.
Vacuum isn’t measured in psi.
geezer#99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2020, 01:57 PM   #4
jimijam00
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 553
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

Vacuum canister
jimijam00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2020, 03:05 PM   #5
gmc684x4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Whitehorse yukon
Posts: 1,218
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

You can use a hydroboost brake setup
I am doing that with my c10 build use a hydroboost out of a 99 express van
From what i have read square body 1 ton trucks are the prefered to use in our trucks
gmc684x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2020, 05:12 PM   #6
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Entrapment
Posts: 6,375
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

I would hydroboost it regardless to be honest. It’s the single best thing I’ve done to my K20 to date. I can lock all four tires up on asphalt with little effort if I choose to. Obviously locked and sliding isn’t stopping faster but the assist is quite a bit stronger than my vacuum setup ever was. It also provides very nice pedal feel. The unit in my truck came from a 2009ish silverado 2500 with a 6.0. You see the install in the build thread for my K20, see my signature.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 315/75/16's
‘87 IROC-Z all original 50K mile survivor TPI 305 IROC Blue
‘10 Camaro 2SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic #93 -version 2.0
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2020, 06:39 PM   #7
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,397
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

It would be easier and cheaper to install a vacuum pump if the engine doesn't pull enough vacuum at idle. I'd personally use a properly sized manual master cylinder if it were mine.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2020, 12:41 AM   #8
gmc684x4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Whitehorse yukon
Posts: 1,218
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

The op built a done up 383
I doubt he wants to take his truck back to the 60s with manual brakes and manual stearing approach

Hydroboost are expensive if you buy it as a kit from lmc lots of late model salvage options
gmc684x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2020, 12:55 AM   #9
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,397
Re: Vacuum Pressure and Potential Brake Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmc684x4 View Post
The op built a done up 383
I doubt he wants to take his truck back to the 60s with manual brakes and manual stearing approach

Hydroboost are expensive if you buy it as a kit from lmc lots of late model salvage options
True. I should just let people drop their money without other considerations.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com