02-27-2022, 11:47 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,563
|
Re: Holley carb question
At least least there are few, if any, personal attacks here.
10-15 years ago I spent a lot of time on the ChevyTalk.org Performance forum. However, it's just about dead now. I think that's because several folks there jumped right into name-calling when confronted with differing opinions. I mean there were raging verbal battles which the admins tolerated. Too bad, because there were a lot of really sharp guys there, too.
__________________
Mike 1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes. 1982 C10 SWB -- sold 1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it! 1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming. Retired as a factory automation products salesman. Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop. Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then! Last edited by MikeB; 02-27-2022 at 02:10 PM. |
02-27-2022, 01:35 PM | #27 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,082
|
Re: Holley carb question
I was just talking to someone about this on my 70. The factory quadrajest are all 750 (or 850). He mentioned that a stock or mild engine the 600 650 is more than enough, but at higher RPMs they tend to make the engine run lean. So if you are gonna hot rod it a lot, go bigger, if like mine it is a cruiser the 600 is more than enough.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
02-27-2022, 02:28 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,563
|
Re: Holley carb question
The beauty of Q-jets was the small primaries, which made for much higher air velocity (and better fuel atomization) than even a 500 cfm square bore carb. So you could have the capability to flow 725-800 cfm without sacrificing throttle response.
__________________
Mike 1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes. 1982 C10 SWB -- sold 1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it! 1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming. Retired as a factory automation products salesman. Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop. Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then! |
06-04-2022, 05:20 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 622
|
Re: Holley carb question
Thank you guys for all of the responses. Some time has passed and I still have the 1850-3 although a little more tuned to my engine. Found out p.o. did a lot of tuning to this carb for his engine as well. Like capping off the fresh air vent for the electric choke so that it burned up the choke coil spring. So now its wired straight open all the time. Also installed a aftermarket power valve shield which consists of a hollow base plate screw with a check ball that acts like a vacuum signal passage for the power valve and the check ball will seal off that passage in the event of a backfire. The only thing is you have to block off the factory vacuum signal passage in the base plate with a lead slug and peen it over. Well he didnt do that, so I used a aluminum pop rivet ground down to a taper and driven in and peened over. Those two things alone cleared up about 80% of the problems I was having. I still get a weird whistle sound when I'm pedal to the metal and it's going through the power band. He also clipped the secondary diaphragm spring. So I bought a spring kit and ended up with the brown one but I think it's too stiff as I can only get the secondaries to kick in for a bout a second. So I'm gonna swap in a lighter one since I did all this other correcting of things and see how it reacts now. But over all I agree that holleys make more power than edelbrocks. I've had the truck up to where the speedo needle is about 1/8 inch away from 0 on the factory speedo. And it still had more it in. But that was fast enough for me. I'm ok with that.
__________________
1972 C/10 LWB - Mine 1964 C/10 LWB - My Dad's Instagram: Mike_The_Grad |
06-05-2022, 09:42 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Falls City, Nebraska "100 Miles From Nowhere"
Posts: 2,219
|
Re: Holley carb question
Get that wide band AFR gauge set up, take the guess work out of the equation...
__________________
Michael of the clan Hill, "Two Seventy Two's" 71 1-ton Dually 350 4-Speed 71 C/50 Grain Truck, 350 Split-Axle 4-Speed 02 3/4 ton Express 14 Indian Chief Vintage 1952 Ford 8N, "Only Ford Allowed On The Property" "Be American, Buy American" |
06-05-2022, 01:20 PM | #31 | |
Active Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 126
|
Re: Holley carb question
Quote:
__________________
1971 Pontiac Firebird 1971 GMC C2500 |
|
06-05-2022, 02:37 PM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
|
Re: Holley carb question
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|