The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2024, 06:02 AM   #1
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,624
Box vs C channel frame

I am debating on if I want to redo my Willys wagon project.

Right it is on F150 4x4 frame, and I am thinking I will slam it instead. Due to knee, and hip issues.

So I know toyota had frame issues with frames rusting out partially due to box construction.

So should I use box frame construction sealing it up or drilling in drain hole.

Or use C channel to fabricate the frame.
Ziegelsteinfaust is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2024, 05:23 PM   #2
LS short box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 2,095
Re: Box vs C channel frame

Kind of depends on how you are going to use it the enviorment it's going to live in.
I vote for the tube frame. I think it would easier to fab and have much more strenght than a c-channel frame. Most if not all aftermarket frames are tube construction.
Wouldn't hurt to add some drain holes.
LS short box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2024, 02:20 PM   #3
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,624
Re: Box vs C channel frame

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS short box View Post
Kind of depends on how you are going to use it the enviorment it's going to live in.
I vote for the tube frame. I think it would easier to fab and have much more strenght than a c-channel frame. Most if not all aftermarket frames are tube construction.
Wouldn't hurt to add some drain holes.
It will just be a cruiser nothing serious.
Ziegelsteinfaust is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2024, 12:28 PM   #4
kwmech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,599
Re: Box vs C channel frame

If you are spending that kind of money into manufacturing a frame---I would finish it up with all the brackets and such then look into having it zinc or galvanized dipped before assembly. But certainly a boxed frame would live in California. Back East--not so much, even with the dip
kwmech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2024, 05:57 PM   #5
LS short box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 2,095
Re: Box vs C channel frame

I would be suprised if you could find a plating shop with zinc tank big enough to plate a whole frame. Plus zinc is a poor coating to stop rust. I worked for a company the builds packaging machines. In early days (mid-80's) we zinc plated parts. But from feed back from customers the zinc didn't really provide much rust protection. We switched to nickel plating and it was the answer.
Galvanizing is good at stopping rust but it's ugly to look at. Every tapped hole has to be re-tapped. We built a number of machines for the dairy industry. They had to be heavy wash down and we galvanized the frames. Outside shop did it for us. Then in the mid 90's we switched to stainless frames and parts for all wash down machines. No more galvanizing.
LS short box is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com