Should I change heads?

[Detour]

The truck is a 67' K20 that supposedly came with a 327 factory. However, the current block dates it most likely to a 64' Impala with a hodge lodge of years/models for parts. The heads are the pyramid onto of a rectangle, that the internet says are 9.25:1 59cc chambers and 1.72/1.50 valves.

The truck will only be used for camping and Home Depot runs... once in a blue moon to tow a 2 horse trailer. So I don't care about maximum power, but I do like tinkering and a extra power is fun to play with.

So the question. I hear a lot about camel hump heads and the like and was wondering if they would be worth swapping to. Looks like they flow better, but have 62cc chambers which would lower the compression and might hurt low end torque.

Other info. Quadrajet, 1968 corvette factory manifold, 2.5" single exhaust, current cam is a mystery, but thinking about a mild upgrade in the future.

[Accelo]

I would retain what you have if the only option was the camel hump heads.
If I changed heads it would be to the Vortec heads. They have stellite valve and hardened seats plus flow a bunch better than the antique camel hump heads.
The also require center bolt valve covers that don't leak and a different intake.
It will increase power over what you have.
I can see no reason to run the old heads unless you are restoring a truck.

[Detour]

I have seen good things about the Vortec heads over the years but I want to keep the old manifold style with the front oil fill tube. Opinion on that might change in the future. Thanks for the info.

[geezer#99]

What’s the casting numbers on the block and heads?
And what numbers/letters are on the pad in front of the passenger side head?
You need to confirm what you have first.

[Willshook]

Zero benefit to that change; keep your money.

"Camel hump" (462/487) heads were the best of their time, but even a stock Vortec flows more with a better chamber. And with any head swap, you gotta match the cam.

Vortec chambers are 64cc, so you'd be losing about 1/2 point of compression...also not a good thing.

A machine shop could drill, bore and ream a hole for the filler if you gotta have it.

Better places to spend money - small-tube headers, mild cam swap, cheap intake, etc.

Head swaps are never as easy you might think...

[Detour]

Attachment 2384903

Originally Posted by geezer#99

What’s the casting numbers on the block and heads?
And what numbers/letters are on the pad in front of the passenger side head?
You need to confirm what you have first.

Here is a picture of the pad, I was not able to find reference to this casting when I looked last year. The numbers on the back of the block are 3858180

[GASoline71]

"S" suffix code comes back as a 1962 327 in a "full size" car with a Powerglide

But the Casting number shows a 64-67 327 with 250-300 hp

Gary