The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 10:37 PM   #276
TX3100Guy
Senior Member
 
TX3100Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Lucas, TX
Posts: 512
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsraven View Post
if you have a place nearby that makes cables with pressed on connections you could have a cable made for the purpose of engine torque restriction, you know, to save the hassle of a motor mount giving out and causing damage. they could press on a connection with a bolt hole the size you need and the cable length you need. ensure to leave a little slack so the engine can move a little otherwise you will hear the harmonics of the engine through the solid link to the frame when the engine pulls even a little.personally I think cable looks better than chain, just me though.
Just how often do a new front and two new rear mounts (on the bell housing) give way?
__________________
1953 Chevy 3100 - 5 window 1/2 ton pickup

My 1953 Chevy Work-In-Process Photo Gallery

"I don't have a carbon footprint, I drive everywhere."
TX3100Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:42 PM   #277
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,538
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

Quote:
Originally Posted by geezer#99 View Post
Considering the front mount, is there a need for an engine tie down strap?
Only if the torque on launch dictates the need. That same motormount setup worked in two ton trucks coming out of fields well overloaded in compound low with engines putting out all the torque they could muster without failures. At least I never heard of them failing. Leaking oil compromising the rubber was normally the reason for failure. At least every one I seen that was bad was oil soaked. That isn't likely to happen on that engine.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:59 PM   #278
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,643
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

Considering the quality of new parts these days, anything could happen.
geezer#99 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:58 AM   #279
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,538
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

Quote:
Originally Posted by geezer#99 View Post
Considering the quality of new parts these days, anything could happen.
It doesn't take much effort or $ to install a chain to keep the engine from torqueing over too much and that is old school tech. You just leave enough slack so that the chain stops it from moving too far but still lets it move normally.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:42 AM   #280
leegreen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 816
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

With the cable throttle torque reaction of the motor won't pin the throttle open.
Anyone reading this with a solid rod throttle setup: the key safety thing for you is to make sure the link between firewall and engine is angled so that if the motor rises up after a mount brakes the arc of the link moving closes the throttle, not opens.

With new mounts I'd just keep an eye on them. Or weld a tab to the cross member to limit how much the motor can twist if RR mount breaks. Or run the ignition wire so it unplugs itself if the motor flops over.

That is a very pretty engine bay, a chunk of chain is going to look off.
leegreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:09 AM   #281
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,078
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

as for new motor mounts, they don't make'em like they used to...
a short length of cable with pressed on ends and possibly covered with black shrink tube or the like would not be noticed too much under the hood, wouldn't rattle or remove paint etc. it's just a suggestion because I have see and worked with the "new" motor mounts for that truck and thought about how they didn't look as tough as they did in "the old days" and thought about the extra torque your new motor with the supercharger would have. it would be a shame to have something let go and not be ready for it, thats all.
like LG says, new mounts, keep an eye on them.
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:17 AM   #282
TX3100Guy
Senior Member
 
TX3100Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Lucas, TX
Posts: 512
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsraven View Post
as for new motor mounts, they don't make'em like they used to...
a short length of cable with pressed on ends and possibly covered with black shrink tube or the like would not be noticed too much under the hood, wouldn't rattle or remove paint etc. it's just a suggestion because I have see and worked with the "new" motor mounts for that truck and thought about how they didn't look as tough as they did in "the old days" and thought about the extra torque your new motor with the supercharger would have. it would be a shame to have something let go and not be ready for it, thats all.
like LG says, new mounts, keep an eye on them.
I'm pretty confident with the new motor mounts, but then again I was confident on the quality of the engine until it began puking oil all over my shop floor and discovered about at least two tubes of RTV stuffed up between the front edge of the oil pan and the front motor mount, to deal with the cracked front crank bearing cap.

I like the idea of a cable versus a jangling chain. Could I attach it to the block on the drivers side where the three bolt side motor mount holes on the block already exist? Where on the frame would it be attached? Since this hot rod inspired truck isn't going to have bumpers, there are existing holes in the frame for the bumper bracket bolts.

How heavy/gauge of a cable would I need?
__________________
1953 Chevy 3100 - 5 window 1/2 ton pickup

My 1953 Chevy Work-In-Process Photo Gallery

"I don't have a carbon footprint, I drive everywhere."
TX3100Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 11:26 AM   #283
dsraven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 8,078
Re: Eliminate draft tube options

Obviously the higher up on the engine the better the leverage would be. It also doesn't need to be located at the front.
I think 3/8 cable would be fine with swaged steel ends. Attaching to the web if the frame is best, or a crossmember. Think of where it will achieve the best leverage advantage.
dsraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com