The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2014, 09:04 PM   #26
Redcap
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lewis County, WA
Posts: 1,523
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jankovic View Post
I'm not bent on the 203. I just know that I have, on several occasions required 4WD due to snow and mud. It was very convenient to just throw it in 4wd. I wouldn't like getting out and locking the hubs when encountering icy/muddy terrain.

I want that convenience and just wanted to see if there was an economical option to save fuel as well.

haha I got the cake and want to eat it too!
You can always lock the hubs in and then drive it in 2WD when you get to that territory.
__________________
'77 K35 - 454, SM465/NP205, 4.56 D60/14bFF
Redcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 09:10 PM   #27
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

or use auto hubs. cake you can eat.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 10:46 PM   #28
Jankovic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekkidhillbilly View Post
or use auto hubs. cake you can eat.
I have read some awful, awful things about auto hubs... only work when you don't need them and fail when you do.
Jankovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 11:43 PM   #29
Redcap
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lewis County, WA
Posts: 1,523
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jankovic View Post
I have read some awful, awful things about auto hubs... only work when you don't need them and fail when you do.
That is about right.
__________________
'77 K35 - 454, SM465/NP205, 4.56 D60/14bFF
Redcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 12:31 AM   #30
motornut
78K & 79C Jimmys
 
motornut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa Ont CANADA
Posts: 7,901
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Rocking back and forth "stuck" can make them autos engage /disengage
not a good idea with spinning wheels
__________________
John
1978 GMCJimmy4X4-350/203
1979 GMCJimmy4X2-305/350
motornut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 10:44 AM   #31
D13
Registered User
 
D13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

The key is, find your motors torque curve and gear for it. ALL my trucks run 1600-1650RPM at 55 - 5.3/4L60E/3.23 3/4 ton, 4.3/700R4/3.08 1/2 ton, and 6.2 diese/700R4/3.08 1/2 ton. Any less RPM, lugs excessively. Any more, wasting fuel.

One of th rare cases where math is your friend. But be honest - if you want MPG buy a Cruze and use your truck only when desperately needed.
__________________
1987 2 ton
1982 250/TH350 beater in progress
Dad's 1981 3/4 L6 3 on tree posi and no options, awaiting restoration or scrapping
Plus a mess o' tractors
D13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 11:08 AM   #32
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

You can't lug a carbureted engine down that low and expect anything out of it. The mileage will suffer as well as throttle response/driveability

You really shouldn't with injection either, unless you really never drive that slow....
__________________
You can review the site's rules here.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
As for reading directions...
The directions are nothing but another man's opinion.
Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself...

Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part....

The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right.
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 01:32 PM   #33
wilkin250r
Registered User
 
wilkin250r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 755
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

I've been thinking this same project. Of course, my TH350 and NP203 are in good running condition, so swapping them isn't as high a priority. But here are my thoughts and research:

First, I don't really care for all-wheel drive. It's an open differential between front and rear, so if any set of tires slip then all the power goes to them anyways. I don't believe it buys you anything substantial over 2wd.

I don't know about the NP203, but I know lots of people like the NP205, and they need to get creative to make it fit because of driveline clearance issues. The NP203 might be similar. Personally, I think you would be better off with a transfer case specifically designed to work with the 700R4 like the forementioned NP208 or NP241. If it's a money issue, I bet you could find a transfer case for possibly cheaper than an adapter for the NP203.

If the goal is milage, then I'd still advise you to dump the 203. Spinning all that front running gear is just eating gas. You want selectable hubs and the ability to just run 2wd.

If convience is your issue, I don't think there is anything devastating about running selectable hubs locked all the time. Sure, it will increase the wear and tear, but it can't be worse than an NP203 that is already running them locked all the time, right? I do this in the winter on my Ford pickup up and over mountain passes. Lock the front hubs, but keep the transfer case in 2wd. If I hit snow, put the transfer case in 4WD and I'm golden. I lock my hubs usually around early November, and unlock them around March.

Like I said, I'm in the same boat. I've got the same package, and I'm looking for the same change. I just don't see any major reason to keep that NP203. I researched it once, but I can't remember the reasons that led me to choose the 241 over the 208. But I DO remember they only had a speedometer cable for one year, and then they switched to electronic speedo. So I'm looking for a 700R4/NP241 combo from an 89 Blazer.
__________________
I know a little about cars, but if you have a question about electricity or sport quads, I'm your man!!!
wilkin250r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 01:56 PM   #34
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jankovic View Post
I have read some awful, awful things about auto hubs... only work when you don't need them and fail when you do.
never had any problems on the 84 i had and it had a million miles on it. unless your doing some kind of severe offroading i dont see it being a problem. that said a new truck has no hub selector only thing goes out has nothing to do with the fact there locked. so i cant see it being a harm to leave em locked.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 06:00 PM   #35
Jankovic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilkin250r View Post
I've been thinking this same project. Of course, my TH350 and NP203 are in good running condition, so swapping them isn't as high a priority. But here are my thoughts and research:

First, I don't really care for all-wheel drive. It's an open differential between front and rear, so if any set of tires slip then all the power goes to them anyways. I don't believe it buys you anything substantial over 2wd.

I don't know about the NP203, but I know lots of people like the NP205, and they need to get creative to make it fit because of driveline clearance issues. The NP203 might be similar. Personally, I think you would be better off with a transfer case specifically designed to work with the 700R4 like the forementioned NP208 or NP241. If it's a money issue, I bet you could find a transfer case for possibly cheaper than an adapter for the NP203.

If the goal is milage, then I'd still advise you to dump the 203. Spinning all that front running gear is just eating gas. You want selectable hubs and the ability to just run 2wd.

If convience is your issue, I don't think there is anything devastating about running selectable hubs locked all the time. Sure, it will increase the wear and tear, but it can't be worse than an NP203 that is already running them locked all the time, right? I do this in the winter on my Ford pickup up and over mountain passes. Lock the front hubs, but keep the transfer case in 2wd. If I hit snow, put the transfer case in 4WD and I'm golden. I lock my hubs usually around early November, and unlock them around March.

Like I said, I'm in the same boat. I've got the same package, and I'm looking for the same change. I just don't see any major reason to keep that NP203. I researched it once, but I can't remember the reasons that led me to choose the 241 over the 208. But I DO remember they only had a speedometer cable for one year, and then they switched to electronic speedo. So I'm looking for a 700R4/NP241 combo from an 89 Blazer.
Thanks for the input. I am starting to come around to the NP208 haha.
Jankovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 06:23 PM   #36
Jankovic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by D13 View Post
The key is, find your motors torque curve and gear for it. ALL my trucks run 1600-1650RPM at 55 - 5.3/4L60E/3.23 3/4 ton, 4.3/700R4/3.08 1/2 ton, and 6.2 diese/700R4/3.08 1/2 ton. Any less RPM, lugs excessively. Any more, wasting fuel.

One of th rare cases where math is your friend. But be honest - if you want MPG buy a Cruze and use your truck only when desperately needed.
I'm not expecting superior fuel mileage with this truck. I just want to do whatever is cost/time-effective to try to get "good" mileage (10-14mpg). I will research the torque curve and try to optimize it that way. Like I said before, I heard that 2200rpm @ 65-70mph is ideal. By my calculations I would need 4.56 gears to do this.
Jankovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 06:56 PM   #37
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

my 01 ran 1800-1900 at 70 it was 4wd would never get under 17-18 mpg no matter how fast you drove it. most of the time was in the 20-21 mpg range. saw about 23-24 mpg once on the highway. i dont see that your lugging it like mentioned. most v8s dont lug until there under 1500 rpm. my dads 4.3 s10 was the same it was 67 at 1900.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:06 PM   #38
Flames97
Registered User
 
Flames97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tonasket, Washington
Posts: 316
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Jankovic,
I know what you mean about your 203/fulltime. I've thought about doing the same as your thinking and using a 700r4. But just in the thought process. May never do it. Anyways...along time ago I changed mine to part time and have regreted it ever since. I don't wheel or beat in my truck so I don't need a beefier transfer case. And I found that now when I am in 4wd it catches when I turn in a parking lot if there is an area that isn't slick. Also I find that I got even tire wear with the full time and terrible tire wear with part time. So some day I'll change it back.
Anyway just sharing thoughts and saying I understand where you are coming from.
__________________
-Aaron

'15.5 Chevy Duramax LTZ/Z71, LML, CC/SB
'77 Chevy K10, 4" lift, 33-12.50, 350/350
'55 Chevy Short Box (In Pieces)MII,4-link,Bagged,383 Stroker,700r4,3.73posi (SOLD)
My 55.2 Chevy 3100 Build
Flames97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:11 PM   #39
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames97 View Post
Jankovic,
I know what you mean about your 203/fulltime. I've thought about doing the same as your thinking and using a 700r4. But just in the thought process. May never do it. Anyways...along time ago I changed mine to part time and have regreted it ever since. I don't wheel or beat in my truck so I don't need a beefier transfer case. And I found that now when I am in 4wd it catches when I turn in a parking lot if there is an area that isn't slick. Also I find that I got even tire wear with the full time and terrible tire wear with part time. So some day I'll change it back.
Anyway just sharing thoughts and saying I understand where you are coming from.
you wont have that with a 208/241 thats part of the quirks of the 203 kit.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:14 PM   #40
Flames97
Registered User
 
Flames97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tonasket, Washington
Posts: 316
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekkidhillbilly View Post
you wont have that with a 208/241 thats part of the quirks of the 203 kit.
Ahhh...good to know!! Thanks
__________________
-Aaron

'15.5 Chevy Duramax LTZ/Z71, LML, CC/SB
'77 Chevy K10, 4" lift, 33-12.50, 350/350
'55 Chevy Short Box (In Pieces)MII,4-link,Bagged,383 Stroker,700r4,3.73posi (SOLD)
My 55.2 Chevy 3100 Build
Flames97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:19 PM   #41
Jankovic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames97 View Post
Jankovic,
I know what you mean about your 203/fulltime. I've thought about doing the same as your thinking and using a 700r4. But just in the thought process. May never do it. Anyways...along time ago I changed mine to part time and have regreted it ever since. I don't wheel or beat in my truck so I don't need a beefier transfer case. And I found that now when I am in 4wd it catches when I turn in a parking lot if there is an area that isn't slick. Also I find that I got even tire wear with the full time and terrible tire wear with part time. So some day I'll change it back.
Anyway just sharing thoughts and saying I understand where you are coming from.
Aaron, How did you part-time your truck? by converting the 203 over or by replacing it with a part-time transfer case (NP208, NP205, etc)?
Jankovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:21 PM   #42
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

he did the 203 conversion. i hear nothing but horror stories out of it from the jeep guys.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:34 PM   #43
Jankovic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekkidhillbilly View Post
he did the 203 conversion. i hear nothing but horror stories out of it from the jeep guys.
Yeah, I don't think I'll got that route.

So no wheel chirp wheel in 2wd with a 208 nekkidhillbilly?

I intend on putting a Detroit Truetrac in the rear end btw.
Jankovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 07:43 PM   #44
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

wasnt in the truck i had which was a k20 or the few k5s and k10s ive rode in. i dont see how it could really in the front the thing is completely free spinning in the shiftable 4wds when not engaged. its just like throwing a trans in neutral. the later trucks like my 04-01 your hubs stay engaged even and ive never had that issue. now ive had rear posi do that in curve on a hill some times but that has nothing to do with a 4wd system since its occured even in a 2wd truck ive driven.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2014, 08:54 PM   #45
Flames97
Registered User
 
Flames97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tonasket, Washington
Posts: 316
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jankovic View Post
Aaron, How did you part-time your truck? by converting the 203 over or by replacing it with a part-time transfer case (NP208, NP205, etc)?
I used the mile marker conversion.
__________________
-Aaron

'15.5 Chevy Duramax LTZ/Z71, LML, CC/SB
'77 Chevy K10, 4" lift, 33-12.50, 350/350
'55 Chevy Short Box (In Pieces)MII,4-link,Bagged,383 Stroker,700r4,3.73posi (SOLD)
My 55.2 Chevy 3100 Build
Flames97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 08:30 AM   #46
Jankovic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 11
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Well from what I've been reading, the first step is definitely a vacuum gauge regardless of the gearing and transmission. I just might be steering to the 700r4 - np208 - locking hubs configuration.

I like the idea of just keeping the hubs locked in the winter months and unlocking them in the warmer months. Being honest with myself, I have got stuck in snow way more than in mud. Mainly because if it seems muddy, I stop and ask myself whether it is worth it. (stuck, get out walk, get a tractor, or go to the neighbors and ask for their tractor all the while in a soupy mess). Snow isn't as bad.

I'll chew on this for a bit. Whatever install I do, I will be back on this thread to update what configuration gave me the best fuel mileage. I plan on working on the truck once the weather warms up (currently -19C or -2.2F haha).
Jankovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 10:45 AM   #47
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

i odnt think you will complain with the set up at all. how healty is your engine btw you may look into a ls/60e swap with the 208 if your going to need a better engine soon anyhow.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 11:23 AM   #48
cadillac_al
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,368
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

Running your front hubs locked while in 2wd on ice is going to make for some funky handling. Those front wheels aren't going to roll as easy as being unlocked and will be sliding instead of rolling. You don't want to learn that the hard way. If you don't need all wheel drive in your climate then a part time transfer is all you need.
__________________
76 Chevy K20
76 GMC K15
77 Chevy C10
77 Chevy K10
cadillac_al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 11:29 AM   #49
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 1978 full-time 4x4. Is a 700r4 worth it?

you do realize that all trucks built in the past 20 years besides superduties have the front wheels locked all the time from the factory. i just drove my 04 in 2wd on ice you dont notice it really.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
14 bolt, 350 sbc, 700r4, mpg, th400


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com