|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-08-2012, 03:48 PM
|
#26 |
|
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 19,996
|
Re: Would this look stupid?
It might look stupid, but I guarantee you that seat will be a LOT more comfortable than a stock seat with 40 year old foam.
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed. 1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck. RIP ElJay RIP 67ChevyRedneck RIP Grumpy Old Man |
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 04:04 PM
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,278
|
Re: Would this look stupid?
Quote:
__________________
'68 C-10 SWB 383 Stroker (Sold 3/2/2013) '87 R2500 LWB 454 TBI converted to Carb 
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 05:19 PM
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 470
|
Re: Would this look stupid?
imho UGLY lol its hard to find a seat that looks good in these trucks, why dont u find some oem style low back buckets?
__________________
70 C10 working on a LSx swap  4.8L MS3 edelbrock pro flo intake, pacesetter long tubes, 4l60e 2500 stall hoping the tranny holds up lol |
|
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#29 |
|
Old Skool Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
|
Re: Would this look stupid?
Here's what screamin_c10 put in his truck. Pix are from '06, and from the link that I posted on the first page of replies. This is the same seat that I have. It is comfy....
__________________
Member Nr. 2770 '96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed. '69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo The older I get, the better I was. |
|
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 07:36 PM
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,856
|
Re: Would this look stupid?
yes
... well you asked... |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
