The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2009, 05:20 PM   #26
olblue81
Registered User
 
olblue81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 189
Re: 6.0 LS or build a 406?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68 TT View Post
If you want to make more than about 350 hp then the 406 gets expensive very quickly. A decent pair of aftermarket heads put it right at the cost of the 6.0 swap but when you throw in a steel crank & good rods you go way past the 6.0 swap.

As stated earlier a simple cam swap in the 6.0 can build amazing power with no other changes except tuning for the cam.
I am figuring on 425-450 hp so I was looking at SCAT or Eagle rotating assemblies and AFR 180cc heads. I thought anymore than that would be risky with a 2 bolt GM block but I know others would disagree.

Once I started adding it up, I got to thinking about the 6.0 swap. L92 heads and a cam swap put a 6.0 up to 550 hp according to Car Craft and that's way more than what I want or need.
__________________
Stu-

1981 GMC Sierra Classic LWB
355- original 2 bolt block, 10.2:1, vortec heads, Comp XE268 cam, built by self in 1992
700R4-2000 stall with lockup, shift kit, Corvette servo
3.07 open diff- I need a 3.73 posi!

2nd owner since 1986 - 388,000 km and counting. 100k by the first owner and the rest by me.
olblue81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 05:46 PM   #27
68 TT
Still plays with trucks
 
68 TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,556
Re: 6.0 LS or build a 406?

With the 400 blocks larger main journals most racers prefer the 2-bolt blocks. More meat in the main bearing saddle area. With only wanting 450 hp you can get away with just main studs in the 2-bolt block. You don't need to spend the bucks to install splayed main caps.

You can't go wrong with the Scat forged rotating assembly. I have used several of them on past projects and really liked the quality. My engine builder swears by them and hates the poor tolerances of the Eagle stuff.

At 450 hp you can also get away with running a good aftermarket iron head and save some more cash. The Sportsman II is a great lower cost performance head. The cost savings over the AFR's will nearly pay for your bottom end. You just won't have the cool factor of the aluminum heads.

Last edited by 68 TT; 07-21-2009 at 10:42 AM. Reason: TYPO
68 TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 06:00 PM   #28
Manbearpig
Registered User
 
Manbearpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Midland, Tx
Posts: 418
Re: 6.0 LS or build a 406?

Get a 6.0 LQ4 and build it to a 370
__________________
1972 GMC C10

Last edited by Manbearpig; 07-21-2009 at 02:13 AM.
Manbearpig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 07:47 PM   #29
olblue81
Registered User
 
olblue81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 189
Re: 6.0 LS or build a 406?

68TT- you're right about the heads. They would be a splurg and would be overkill. But there's no kill like overkill.
__________________
Stu-

1981 GMC Sierra Classic LWB
355- original 2 bolt block, 10.2:1, vortec heads, Comp XE268 cam, built by self in 1992
700R4-2000 stall with lockup, shift kit, Corvette servo
3.07 open diff- I need a 3.73 posi!

2nd owner since 1986 - 388,000 km and counting. 100k by the first owner and the rest by me.
olblue81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com