The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2013, 11:25 AM   #1
BB72CHEVKT
Junior Member
 
BB72CHEVKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hideaway, TX
Posts: 4,950
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

I am running a static drop on my burb and I am very happy with the ride. It handles in corners really well. I also had the front end completely rebuilt and added an ECE sway bar.
Attached Images
 
__________________
71 Suburban 350/700R4 Project Trixie
72 CHEVY,Highlander,SWB,396,T400
BB72CHEVKT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 04:34 PM   #2
biohazardbill
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Forsyth, Ga
Posts: 1,012
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

For me it was a decision of how low I wanted to go. The stance I wanted as ride height would not allow me to get out of my driveway without scraping if i were to do it static. So to achieve the look I wanted I had to go bags..... You can do it cheap.... look up tcm-1 he had a very economical and functional air ride setup.
biohazardbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 04:45 PM   #3
Graham57a
Senior Member
 
Graham57a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Asheville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,850
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Anyone run bags without a compressor? I have bags on the rear of my truck and will eventually have bags up front when I get tubular lowers but want to run springs for now to cut down on cost and modification. The PO had bags on the rear and springs up front and just ran valves out of the frame rail so you could adjust the psi. Is this a bad idea? I would like to eventually get a compressor but wanted to add that later down the road
Graham57a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 06:58 PM   #4
biohazardbill
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Forsyth, Ga
Posts: 1,012
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham57a View Post
Anyone run bags without a compressor? I have bags on the rear of my truck and will eventually have bags up front when I get tubular lowers but want to run springs for now to cut down on cost and modification. The PO had bags on the rear and springs up front and just ran valves out of the frame rail so you could adjust the psi. Is this a bad idea? I would like to eventually get a compressor but wanted to add that later down the road
I have seen people do it with scuba tanks.....
biohazardbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 07:20 PM   #5
jeh
Registered User
 
jeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: sutton WV
Posts: 1,822
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

I talked to Jay with American Pastimes today, he worked me up a package with RideTech bags and a set of 2.5" spindles. I'll do a little more research, but I think that's what I'm looking for.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Jason
'70 C-10 short fleet 427BB TH400 (SOLD)
'10 Ford F 350
'13 Ford RAPTOR 6.2

MY BUILD THREAD http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=612623
jeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:54 PM   #6
sundog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 28
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

It's funny it hasn't been mentioned, but you could save hundreds using a belt driven compressor. You can find them for dirt cheap used ($50 or less), they put out more cfm than an electric compressor, and even a hobby mechanic can build brackets for them.
sundog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 04:43 PM   #7
CC69Rat
Registered User
 
CC69Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 6,208
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

jeh - Maybe you could do Shrader bags for now, then when you can work out / save some more fun money get your on-board stuff, controllers, etc.

Shrader bags are a lot like the old school air shocks. You can adjust the height where you want it and well .. leave it and enjoy the ride, OR .. if you run to Home Depot and get 10 bags of cement just air it up at the gas station to level it back off.

Have you looked at the Porterbuilt stage 2 kit(s) ?
__________________
Chad

1967 C10 SWB - Project Savannah - 6.0/4L80 *Currently underway*
1968 C10 SWB - TOTY 2018, 50th Anniversary Tribute Project * Sold * Pride and Joy
1986 Silverado Short Fleet - Scarlet *Sold*
1985 Silverado Short Fleet *Sold*
2022 Jeep Gladiator Mojave
2001 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted, Built
1992 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted
2013 Honda Accord EX-L v6 Coupe 6spd (wife's ride)
CC69Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 02:06 AM   #8
SBC
Registered User
 
SBC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 202
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Should have mentioned that's (^^^) what I did. PB stage 1 front and PB stage 2 rear. Your gonna like it, perfect setup if your not looking to lay frame.
__________________
1967 C-10 Project
2008 Suburban
2017 GMC Sierra
SBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 11:43 AM   #9
Malamute
Registered User
 
Malamute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 756
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Quote:
Originally Posted by sundog View Post
It's funny it hasn't been mentioned, but you could save hundreds using a belt driven compressor. You can find them for dirt cheap used ($50 or less), they put out more cfm than an electric compressor, and even a hobby mechanic can build brackets for them.
I have often wondered about that and these trucks. When I had my Jeep I installed a York compressor for my on board air and it worked great. I could air up my 36" tires from 5psi to 28psi in about 1 min/tire.

The only negative is it would need to be incorporated under the hood and it really doesn't look as clean. No clue what belt configuration one would need either. That wasn't really a worry with a Jeep.
Malamute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 12:26 PM   #10
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham57a View Post
Anyone run bags without a compressor? I have bags on the rear of my truck and will eventually have bags up front when I get tubular lowers but want to run springs for now to cut down on cost and modification. The PO had bags on the rear and springs up front and just ran valves out of the frame rail so you could adjust the psi. Is this a bad idea? I would like to eventually get a compressor but wanted to add that later down the road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malamute View Post
I have often wondered about that and these trucks. When I had my Jeep I installed a York compressor for my on board air and it worked great. I could air up my 36" tires from 5psi to 28psi in about 1 min/tire.

The only negative is it would need to be incorporated under the hood and it really doesn't look as clean. No clue what belt configuration one would need either. That wasn't really a worry with a Jeep.
Engine driven compressors are cool, but require mods to help keep down on oil consumption.
If you are just filling a tank to air up tires or run air tools it would be cool.

But at the price of individual air valves, or even more expensive block valves, (like RideTech or Accuair valve),... I would hate to contaminate those high dollar air ride control valves with oil.
Parker valves can be disassembled and cleaned,... but who wants to do that all the time.
Just my opinion.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 12:30 PM   #11
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Search EDC compressors:
Just one of many threads about them:
http://www.fullsizechevy.com/forum/g...edc-issue.html

Now they say,... no oil mod.
Anyone know for sure???

After Talking to Brad Kilby himself from onboardair.com for about a 1/2hr here is what i learned to be untrue from folklore and the myths and the best ways to run these things.

#1 yorks require a MINIMUM of 6 fl oz. not 5.5 or anything less, under 6oz they will not lubricate AT ALL

#2 do not do the york oil mod, it is not necessary and will starve the york from oiling the front seal and will block air flow as well to the head.. and starves the head from oiling itself.

#3 run and maintain 12 fluid oz of straight 30 weight (non detergent!) oil. again any time below 6oz you are literally running without oil!!!

#4 the best way to run them is to run a good oil/water trap/filter and check your levels and empty the filter often... will let the york last longer and run cooler, the way it was intended to be used.

#5 as with any motor the faster the rpm it sees it will increase output but the yorks gets especially hot in higher rpms, best to try to keep engine speed at lower rpms less than 1500 while its engauged but is capable of 6000rpm..

#6 unloaders are pointless, all they do is releive pressure in the head which helps to turn the unit over once engauged which is pointless with a engine turning it, because there is plenty of power to get it moving. does your regular a/c compressor have one? but a small electric compressor would benifit being weak.

#7 use the square cut white teflon seals with the top OBA fittings on the yorks, i didnt and oops!!! with the Tube-O also use the o-ring, both of which are standard a/c service parts.

#8 lastly... the best and only mod to do to these yorks for less oil consumption is to vent the crankcase as follows.
depending on your setup you need use the oil plug hole that would see the internal crank as it is coming down to splash into the pool of oil.. most of our vehicles turn clockwise, so if you were looking at the york from the front of the vehicle (towards the back) the rotation would be moving down at the 3 O'clock position. that is the hole to make a vent for. what this does is let the crankcase pull air through the filter vs pulling air through an oiling hole therefore reducing oil consumption. basically the same thing the "old oil mod" was trying to do.

the threads are 5/16 fine thread (24) the exact fittings i used were from brake line parts from a race car shop..
#1 K&N filter part number 62-2480 (on top)
#2 a 3 to 4" chunk of 5/16" hose and 2 clamps (middle)
#3 Aeroquip brand -4 to -3 inverted flare (- are dashes) (into york)
#4 Aeroquip 1441 hose end push lock -4 female 90 (into above fitting)
#5 is a custom local part but any barb or whatnot will work to go into the 5/16 hose and the filter will set on top of it.. (into hose to hold filter)

see pic below

this setup with a brand new york 57064 Tube-O compressor from 4seasons ac parts is awesome.. little blowby and oil is finally collecting in the filter clean, not discolored and dirty. it is noticibly running cooler and smoother.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 01:06 PM   #12
Malamute
Registered User
 
Malamute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 756
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

Mine had oil IIRC. It also had a clutch in it so it would only run when you flipped the switch and it wouldn't be running all of the time. As you said, not that big of a deal when airing tires or running tools but IF there was a trace amount of oil in the lines you would hate to ruin valves or anything else associated with the air system.
Malamute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 06:18 AM   #13
sundog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 28
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

I know many guys who use belt driven comps. They play with their air all the time, and the engine bays look great.

Powder coat the compressor, get creative with solid lines.

I currently run a Viaar 480c in my car, and although its a great comp, it's a power hog, still takes up space, very loud, wasn't cheap.

Im looking forward to higher cfm in the truck.

As mentioned, regardless if it's an electric or belt driven compressor, you run a separator and filter. My shop compressor is running both as well.

Also, you can service most higher end valves for cleaning, and all tanks should have a water drain. Quality bags have a moisture barrier as well, to help defend against dirty air. Slam Specialties bags are very good for that (and the built in bump stops is a nice bonus)
sundog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 07:20 AM   #14
eightbanger
454 MAKES IT ROAR
 
eightbanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Essex, U.K
Posts: 2,701
Re: Static or bags "question of the day"

More info on the subject here

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=183457
__________________
Nigel.

An American living in a British body.

1971 Chevy Cheyenne 10 454

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell


"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" - Thomas Jefferson

No more pain.
03.12.60 -- 12.28.10

http://www.youtube.com/Eightbanger
eightbanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com