Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-25-2007, 05:28 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 175
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
I've owned alot of 3/4 ton and 1 tons and none of them have every done better that 10 mpg...pulling or not. I even had a 98 dually(7.4L) that under heavy load(14-16k) only averaged 3.9..... the exception is my duramax..it's a beast and pulling the same 14-16k I get 9-12 depending on how many hills I've had to pull and if I've got the 35's on.
__________________
1972 c-20, 350/350, dana 60 w/456 gears(no Posi) |
10-25-2007, 10:23 PM | #27 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,253
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
Quote:
373s with OD is a GREAT candidate for a 700r4 upgrade. PLUS you get a lower first gear (in the 700r4) which is awesome for pulling stuff at low speed. Another nice thing about this mod in a 4x4 is that the speedo cable comes out of the tranfer case. If your odometer is reading correct now, it will be the same after the mod. In a post you made after the one I'm quoting you state that you are running 33 inch tires. If you didn't correct for that in your mpg calculations I'm guessing your speedo is off by 20% and so are your mpg calculations. A factory th350/NP205 with 373 gears had NO correction for the speedo. If you got 307 gears they put a little gear reducer on the output of the transfer case and your speedo goes into that to correct for the different gears. The difference between factory rear end gears is always 10%. 4.56 to 4.11 is 10% different. 4.11 to 3.73 is 10%. 3.73 to 3.07 is 20%. Factory tires are 28 inches tall. 10% of 28 is 2.8. 2.8*2 = 5.6. 28 + 5.6 = 33.6. Doing the math, if you have 3.73 gears and 33 inch tall tires you are in effect making your front and rear end gear ratios similar to factory 3.08 gears. You MIGHT want to go back to 28" tall tires if you do a 700r4 as many people here who put a 700r4 in a 3.08 geared truck found a DECREASE in fuel mileage. That is enough math for one night. I hope everybody reading this paid attention to your math teach in high school. That stuff comes in real hand for stuff like this.
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205. '71 Malibu convertible '72 Malibu hard top Center City, MN |
|
10-25-2007, 10:29 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KINGSPORT,TN.
Posts: 3,035
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
change the rear r&p ratio and install a O.D. trans. = 15-20 mpg
__________________
I BELIEVE IN JOHN 3:16 |
10-25-2007, 11:27 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estherville, Iowa
Posts: 3,371
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
Highest gear in most of the 3/4 was 4.10 with an eaton and many have 4.56, no better ratios available for these. If you can locate A Dana 60 from a big block truck, they were 3.54 ratio. Got a dana 60 3.54 posi sitting in the garage waiting to go into the 1971 when we get time, that's our plan.
__________________
1968 C10 307 3spd Long Fleet ------ http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=201103 1970 C10 305 Super T10 Long Fleet --- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=202285 1971 C20 383 TH350 Dana Posi ----- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=206894 2001 GMC Sierra 1500 C3 6.0 |
10-26-2007, 04:05 AM | #30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Spanaway
Posts: 8,451
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
Quote:
What I did was jack up the rear of the truck, marked the driveshaft and tire and spun it and counted the revolutions of the shaft, this was well over 10 years ago, it came out to roughly 3 and 3/4 turns per 1 turn of the tire, I concluded that I have 3.73's. I have not been able to find any markings on the rearend but its a GM unit from what I have gathered. Now that said heres the conflict, I do have that little adapter sticking out of the transfer case too, kinda makes me wonder if the 1st owner did some mods to the truck? I bought it from my step dad and am the 3rd owner. I would do the math if I had the formula! LOL! <- Means laughing out loud.
__________________
Mike. Swamp Rat build thread : http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=595019 72 3/4T 4X4 4" BDS Lift 33" BFG's |
|
10-26-2007, 04:07 AM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Spanaway
Posts: 8,451
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
What do you drive? 3/4 4X4?
__________________
Mike. Swamp Rat build thread : http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=595019 72 3/4T 4X4 4" BDS Lift 33" BFG's |
10-26-2007, 04:38 AM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Freedom CA
Posts: 488
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
Quote:
I was getting 11 MPG with a tired 350, but it cracked a valve. New low miles with fancy parts 350 from PnP got 8.5 the other day It was raining and I idled in traffic a bit but... You can feel 'lumpy idle' to 1700 RPM and it seems to pull real hard at high speeds. I think someone put in one of those 'light car with high stall only' cams, and it sucks in a 6200 Lb truck with a stick At 70, aerodynamics can be a pretty big factor. I know a few VW guys who can measure an economy and top speed difference by taping the drip rails(harder to measure with a big motor). A front lip and smooth undertray should make a noticeable difference as well. Mythbusters did some testing, and found a net or open tailgate also made a difference. My big plan is to bump the compression up around 22:1(diesel)when I have too much time on my hands.
__________________
68 Chevrolet k20 Longbed 350 SM465/205, Dana 44, 14bolt, Power steering, Power Disk Brakes, 35" BFGs. 84 Chevrolet Suburban K20 6.2 Banks turbo TH400/NP208 Now with G80 68 GMC C20 Parts? Truck And a few cars Last edited by 68K20 x Drill; 10-26-2007 at 04:39 AM. |
|
10-26-2007, 07:49 AM | #33 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,253
|
Re: C20 milage improvements
Quote:
A good way to check to see if your speedo is on and therefore you mileage calculations are correct is to drive down the road with a GPS. In relative terms a GPS is way more accurate than just about anything out there. Set the GPS to read speed. On my old 5-channel Eagle unit it is "SOG" or Speed Over Ground. Place the unit where the antenna isn't shielded by the truck and where you can see the display without causing you to not pay attention to the road and drive around a bit. If your speed reads the same as your GPS, you know your calculations are correct. If your speedo isn't correct, you may be getting better mileage than you calculated. Or worse. Without a correct speedo your odometer is off and you don't have good data. On the RHS of your rear axle facing forward is a three letter code stamped in the axle tube. Write that down then get on the google and search for Chevy rear axle codes. That will tell you what your rear end ratio is. If your data is good, and you think you may want to go with a 700r4, click over to the 4x4 and off road forum and ask if anybody over there runs 33" tires, 3.73 rear end gears, and a 700r4 before you start spending money. These forums are full of helpful people. In all likelihood somebody there has a K20 with a small block, 3.73 gears, and 33" tall tires. The chances are they'll be more than helpful. Some links on the 4x4 forum: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ighlight=700r4 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ighlight=700r4 One more thing. When I was researching putting a 700r4 in my 4x4, I found that the Advanced Adapters output shaft is cheaper from Summit than from Advanced Adapters. Go to the AA website, get the AA part number for the correct shaft, then search on Summit's website for that part number.
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205. '71 Malibu convertible '72 Malibu hard top Center City, MN |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|