The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > S10 S15 Luv Blazer

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2024, 12:01 AM   #26
Cautrell05
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hoskins nebraska
Posts: 402
Re: Performance Steering & Handling?

Id go 3/4" lower and 1/2" on the upper. +1" on the upper is getting pretty long and they bend pretty easy.
__________________
Fast, Cheap, Reliable. You may pick two

My 47/S10 build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=679723
Cautrell05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2024, 08:05 AM   #27
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,268
Re: Performance Steering & Handling?

Thank you for the information. It is timely as I have been looking at replacing the control arms on mine. The current lower arms are factory arms. And the uppers have already been replaced with UMI versions but they are the non-adjustable versions and the truck has too much positive camber. So they need to be replaced with some adjustable ones so I can get some negative camber.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2024, 04:25 PM   #28
Cautrell05
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hoskins nebraska
Posts: 402
Re: Performance Steering & Handling?

That's unusual that you can't get enough negative camber. Usually the problem is not getting enough positive.
Look into IMCA hobby stock upper control arms. They aren't priced too bad and you have the option of 1/4" shorter than stock on the right arm or 1/4" longer on the left arm. Either arm can be ran on either side depending on exhaust clearance you can also put longer bolts in for the upper control arm.
There's also just enough room to drill new holes for the upper control arm right below the stock ones. That will drop the inner mount about 5/8" and have the same affect on camber gain as running a taller upper ball joint
__________________
Fast, Cheap, Reliable. You may pick two

My 47/S10 build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=679723
Cautrell05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2024, 05:56 PM   #29
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,268
Re: Performance Steering & Handling?

Shooting from the hip here, but if memory still serves me, the camber was in the +.08 to +1.1 range. One side has no threads showing past the upper control arm nuts and the other side has maybe 2 threads showing.

I looked at putting longer bolts in with custom spacers to replace most of the shims but the truck has a LT1 in it and room is at a premium. The current UMI upper arms have 1/2 longer ball joints so if I get UMI adjustable uppers I can reuse the ball joints. UMI says their adjustable uppers are approximately 1/2" shorter than the non-adjustable uppers when fully shortened.

The front and rear suspension has less than 1500 miles on it. The rest of the truck has over 220k miles with the first owner being the US Forest Service. The engine has under 500 miles since being rebuilt. I recently purchased the truck and am getting things dialed in.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2024, 03:37 PM   #30
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,268
Re: Performance Steering & Handling?

Here is a link with factory part upgrades for 1st & 2nd gen S10's. Lots of junk yard parts to tune up the handling. As well as RPO codes to help ID that rear end in the wrecking yard.

See ya out in the yard!

https://www.s10forum.com/search/9992...10&o=relevance
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com