700r4 or TH400 with gear splitter?

[Stingbird]

Alright guys I have a 1970 gmc with a 454 and a TH400. which is better changing out the transmission to a 700r4 or just adding a gear vender gear splitter to the existing transmission to add the extra gears. the goal is to get better gas milage and be able to run it at higher speeds with lower rpms. what do you all think?

[95 S_Trucker]

You may be able to cruise better at highway speeds.

But forget about mileage. The best you will get is 8-9. I get 9-10 with 3.73, overdrive, and modern fuel injection.

Another option would be a different ratio in your rear diff. I assume you have 4.10 or 4.56 back there.


If you do decide on the 700R4, it would need built to last behind a big block.

You could also do a 4L80E with a stand alone controller.

[Chevyrestorerman]

Have you considered how long it would take to get your return on investing 3K on a gear vendor piece. I installed a 700r4 in my 1972 c10 with 3.42 gears well under the price of the piece you are looking at spending 3K. If money is no issue, bombs away on the credit card.

[jbarron]

The GV will lower your rpms, but not your mileage.

Cheapest solution is new gears. If yours is like mine it probably has 4:10s in it.

I would do a 4l80 instead of the 700 if you just want to change something. Still less than the GV.

[DieselSJ]

If those were the only 2 choices, I'd go for the 700R4 for the advantage of having a lockup converter. A 700R4 built will every available upgrade will be less than a GV.

GV does give you the very cool option of splitting gears though.

As others have suggested, a 4L80E is really the way to go.

[Tom]

lol. Yes lowering your cruise rpm will gain mileage. If it didn't the oem's wouldn't have done it seeing as no truck accelerates with a load in overdrive meaning they added no usable gears with overdrive except at cruise.
700R4 with a 454 is a joke. Not an option IMO.

[SunSoaked]

. What Tom said.

[95 S_Trucker]

Originally Posted by Tom

lol. Yes lowering your cruise rpm will gain mileage. If it didn't the oem's wouldn't have done it seeing as no truck accelerates with a load in overdrive meaning they added no usable gears with overdrive except at cruise.
700R4 with a 454 is a joke. Not an option IMO.

In most cases it will, but not with big blocks.

I get 9-10 all the time. It doesn't matter if I am driving empty, towing 8,000 pounds in third gear. The same is true with my rollback. It gets 9-10 when empty(9,000 pounds) and gets the same when fully loaded(15,000 pounds) and in fourth gear. That has 4.88 rear axle and an NV4500.

You can look on this site and many others and see what kind of mileage big blocks are getting.


You don't buy a truck with a big block for mileage. You buy it to haul/tow.

[kwmech]

In my opinion, 700s should NEVER be considered in a truck for any type of work. It is a passenger car transmission. The very last thing I would do is put one behind a big block. I've had enough trouble with them behind small blocks, special drums, vette servos, shift kits heavy duty this and that...they just don't last long term when asked to anything heavy duty, such as towing. Go with a Gear Vendor or a 4L80e. I am converting my Suburban from a 700 to a 4L80 and I have a gear vendor in my 69 flat bed. Flat bed has a built big block and the suburban is a stock 350 tbi soon to be a 400 next year if money allows

[sweetk30]

as said big block engines are for WORK not mileage .

and a good cheep way to optimize fuel mileage is a simple gauge like this .

you will be amazed how much you can gain by watching this little guy . not saying you will get a ton but it will improve .

[Tom]

Originally Posted by kwmech

In my opinion, 700s should NEVER be considered in a truck for any type of work. It is a passenger car transmission.

No its actually very much a truck transmission. Cars used the 200-4R except for full sized caprices.

Originally Posted by 95 S_Trucker

You don't buy a truck with a big block for mileage. You buy it to haul/tow.

That's a terrible statement. Just because you buy something to work doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't maximize its efficiancy where possible. And I know this may sound crazy, but some people buy big blocks for fun, not work. Not too many 48yr old trucks being put to real world, daily business type work these days.

[kwmech]

Originally Posted by Tom

No its actually very much a truck transmission. Cars used the 200-4R except for full sized caprices.

Whatever they're still junk in my book. I've wasted a quite a few grand on 3-4 700s, only to have them either break, slip, not shift correctly etc. All built by professional "700 experts"

[57NAPCO]

Originally Posted by Tom

And I know this may sound crazy, but some people buy big blocks for fun, not work. Not too many 48yr old trucks being put to real world, daily business type work these days.

I just like em, all four of em

[82C10step]

If the engine makes any power, a 700R4 won't live. The GV unit will.

[Chevyrestorerman]

I run a 700R4 behind a big block in my 72 Blazer and my 72 swb 383 c10, never had a issue with my 700R4 transmissions.
But I do not abuse my equipment nor do I expect things to last for ever.

Not sure why so much hating on the 700R4's but I will take all of the ones everyone dont want. Thanks.

As far as gas mileage, big block and gas mileage should not be used in the same sentence. If its your daily driver than I would look to buy another vehicle with better mileage.
Should this be more of a debate on a 700 vs 400 with GV ? 70 LWB truck with a 3000 dollar GV, I dont think I would spend the cash on a GV....Ask yourself what the truck is worth, its a LWB truck right ? the GV is worth half as much as the truck. I already know what I would do but again these forums are so much fun to hear other opinions.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Chevyrestorerman

Not sure why so much hating on the 700R4's

History. Yours are living. Most don't.

the GV is worth half as much as the truck. I already know what I would do but again these forums are so much fun to hear other opinions.

I'm sure others are like me in that the value of the vehicle doesn't mean jack s**t. We aren't building them to sell and make money. We build them to enjoy. You never get your money back on upgrades, that's life.

[Chevyrestorerman]

Like I said in my previous post, its fun to hear other opinions.

[SunSoaked]

Nv4500

[DieselSJ]

I think we scared the OP away.

NV4500 is a good choice if you like rowing through gears (actually have one sitting on the garage floor to replace the TH400 behind the 454 in my R30). If I ever get around to the diesel swap in it, I'll ad a GV behind the NV4500.

Honestly though, if the OP wants an automatic he should be looking at a 4L80E. Not only is there way more strength than a 700R4 (not knocking the 700...I have one living behind a diesel that is making 500+ ft/lbs of torque and it is fine), but the ability to tune lockup and shift points with the controller can really make for a nice driving experience.

[SunSoaked]

Agree on the 4l80. Now...if I could just win the current lottery.

[Chevyrestorerman]

Can you (stingbird) post a pic of your 1970 truck. Thanks
Posted via Mobile Device

[cruizin01]

I put a TransGo shift kit in a junkyard 4l80 and bolted it behind my 396 with a HGM controller. Its shifts like a dream. HGM has a new Bluetooth controller for about $800 that utilizes your phone instead of their more expensive stand alone display.

just another option.

[Ironangel]

To the original question, 400 Turbo w/gv...700r4 aint even an option behind a big block. IMO...