The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2004, 11:01 AM   #26
grayw0lf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
Lemme ask you this,

I like the Lincoln 135, but is it worth the 100 bucks extra for the 135 Plus. The difference being infinite output voltage control, instead of a 4 position switch.
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition!
6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles!
70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days!
05' Dodge Neon
88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6
94' Seadoo SP
84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires.

Always looking for another project or any good deal!

grayw0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004, 09:18 PM   #27
1971 Cheyenne
Registered User
 
1971 Cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,480
TTT, was wondering about the above question.
__________________
Brian Pal
1971 Cheyenne 10 454/th400-Undergoing a full frame off resto.
1972 Chevy short/step 2wd, 350/th350
1983 M1009 CUCV Military K5 Blazer
1981 Dodge 1 ton 4x4 dually flatbed
1971 Cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004, 09:28 PM   #28
glock35ipsc
Next project: 1970 K10
 
glock35ipsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Collins, Colo 80524
Posts: 6,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by grayw0lf
Lemme ask you this,

I like the Lincoln 135, but is it worth the 100 bucks extra for the 135 Plus. The difference being infinite output voltage control, instead of a 4 position switch.
This is just a personal opinion ...... I don't think you will really notice any benefit on the 135 amp welders. But, on the 210-250 amp and up units, I thinkyou will find a noticeable and worth while difference.

You're going to be adjusting from 10 or 20 to 135 amps, versus 20 to 250 amp on the larger ones. That means a larger range of adjustment from the big machines compared to the smaller ones. Unless you are welding VERY thin sheetmetal, save your money. On my Hobart 135, I only ever use #2 or #3. I used to weld some 1/4" stuff with it and would turn it up to #4, but only use it for thin sheet metal on occasion since I have the Miller 210 and a Miller TIG welder now.
__________________
Bob

1970 Chevy K10 LWB "Goldie" 350/TH350 next project!!
1981 Chevy C10 LWB 355/TH350 - My son's truck

LS SWAP FORUM! Tons of LS swap info here!
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT THE GREATEST BOARD ON THE NET!
CLICK HERE FOR THE FAQ INDEX by KRUE

Last edited by glock35ipsc; 06-03-2004 at 09:33 PM.
glock35ipsc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 01:21 PM   #29
grayw0lf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
Lincoln 135 (not Plus) it is. Thanks guys for the input.
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition!
6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles!
70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days!
05' Dodge Neon
88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6
94' Seadoo SP
84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires.

Always looking for another project or any good deal!

grayw0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com