The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2004, 07:52 PM   #26
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by my new 72
I am against it on the 67-72 trucks. I just don't like the issues it causes.
Well, I can only speak from my personal experience.... On the front of my 68, I converted from stock 6-lug drums & factory ride height to almost 6" of drop w/disc brakes using 73-up 2.5"drop spindles, brakes (calipers, rotors, & lines/prop-valve), tie-rod ends, drag link, sway bar, pitman/idler arms (73-up manual steer) & have had no issues w/rubbing.

I could see a problem if someone used incorrect backspacing, but I feel you would see the same issue irregardless of year model (ex: a 72 w/incorrect backspace is just as bad as a 73 w/incorrect backspace). I can say this w/some measure of confirmation since I own both a 68 & a 74; both lowered w/spindles. The control arms are slightly different as far as bushings, yet similar enough dimensionally to be a valid comparison. The main consideration is trucks that utilize spindles for lowering require different offsets than those dropped using modified arms or cut springs.

My 68 doesn't rub @ all using the stock 68 control arms w/73-up drop parts & stock offset 15x6" van ralleys (4" b.space). My 74 does rub the arms @ full lock on the steering, but it has 18x8" wheels w/5.25 b.space.

Is your truck lowered? What parts did you use? Where did it rub? I'm curious if I was just lucky or if there's something I haven't considered when giving advice.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:32 PM   #27
68w/sbc406
Got Light Emitting Diode?
 
68w/sbc406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
do controll arms and spindles change anywhere in the 73-87 era? i went to a local drop shop and he told me that 67-87 arms are close enough to work properly when swaped. just make sure you maintain the right year parts. and he also told me that in 81 there is two different spindle sizes on 1/2 tons, a light duty and a heavy duty. just wondering if anyone else has heard that?
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags

'02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car)

1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler
68w/sbc406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:33 PM   #28
my new 72
faster, faster, faster
 
my new 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston ,Texas ,USA
Posts: 1,354
Well, the issue is not back spacing, it's the 3" drop spindles and 2" drop springs. It could also be the belltech crap spindles the PO used. But I know for sure the rims are not the problem. My 18x8.5's do not rub, but the PO's 17's did, and so did a set of stock ralley wheels. Just use the right year stuff and don't be cheap.
__________________
I'm going to Law School, wanna debate? It's good practice.
my new 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:35 PM   #29
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
Wheel backspacing, & also the amount of drop on the spindle can cause problems. Many of the drop spindles listed for the 73 up trucks are a 3" drop(Belltech for one). the extra drop can cause problems with some wheels depending on offset. Honestly, using the later spindles should not be a problem....crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:42 PM   #30
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68w/sbc406
do controll arms and spindles change anywhere in the 73-87 era? i went to a local drop shop and he told me that 67-87 arms are close enough to work properly when swaped. just make sure you maintain the right year parts. and he also told me that in 81 there is two different spindle sizes on 1/2 tons, a light duty and a heavy duty. just wondering if anyone else has heard that?
I have 75 spindles on my 69, if you swap the balljoint assemblys, & the tierods/center link, they will bolt right on using the early a arms. Yes, there are heavy & lite on the spindles/ rotors in the later trucks. The heavy are 1 .250 thick on the rotors, & the lite are 1".....crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:45 PM   #31
68w/sbc406
Got Light Emitting Diode?
 
68w/sbc406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy longhorn
I have 75 spindles on my 69, if you swap the balljoint assemblys, & the tierods/center link, they will bolt right on using the early a arms. Yes, there are heavy & lite on the spindles/ rotors in the later trucks. The heavy are 1 .250 thick on the rotors, & the lite are 1".....crazyL
thanks crazyL
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags

'02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car)

1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler
68w/sbc406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:58 PM   #32
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
just use the ball joints/ tierods for the yr of the spindle that you use. Best of luck, crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 09:12 PM   #33
BraveDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 336
I did the 4-1/2" and 4" drop on my '72 and the ride is better than original. I agree with everyone else. Don't do it cheap - do it right the first time.
__________________
'72 Chevy Cheyenne Super, '56 Chevy Bel Air,'56 Chevy Nomad, '61 Chevy Impala, '64 Cadillac Fleetwood, 1966 Thunderbird Convertible
BraveDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 09:32 PM   #34
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by my new 72
Well, the issue is not back spacing, it's the 3" drop spindles and 2" drop springs. It could also be the belltech crap spindles the PO used. But I know for sure the rims are not the problem. My 18x8.5's do not rub, but the PO's 17's did, and so did a set of stock ralley wheels. Just use the right year stuff and don't be cheap.
Yes, there is more chance of interference w/3" drop spindles. My 68 uses the 2.5" Western Chassis, my 74 uses the 3" BellTech. But again, the only time my front wheels rub in the 74 is close to full lock. I did trim the a-arms back on both trucks.

I don't see what difference the year-model parts you use make in your reference to "being cheap". The difference is only between 2.5" & 3" spindles. The later 73-up a-arms actually ride smoother thanks to the newer rubber bushings vs. the older solid/rubber lined bushings & are easier to find in wrecking yards.

What is the back space of your 18x8.5's vs. the PO's 17's?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 06-29-2004 at 06:43 PM.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 10:59 PM   #35
nonstopproject
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Al
I was thinking about cutting my coils as well, front and rear. I don't want the 4/6 slammed look like some people on this thread. I want a conservative drop in the front and rear. I also want to keep my slight rake. Would cutting 1 coil off of all 4 really cause that many problems? Since I'm not going for a 4-6" drop in back, will it work better for me?
i cut one coil off the front and invested the $120 for 4" rear coils. i didn't want my daily driver slammed and i think it looks pretty good (conservative). cutting one coil off the front is perfectly fine, they don't fall out, and it still rides good. it was good for about 2" too. so your only real exspense is the coils. i also invested in lowering shocks (60 apiece, ouch) for the rear, make a big difference though.
hope that helps.
nonstopproject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 11:39 PM   #36
silvertonguedevil
Senior Member
 
silvertonguedevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seaside, Oregon
Posts: 1,789
Hey everybody, thanks for all of the information and replies. I think I'm just gonna bite the bullet and do it the right way.
__________________
-Greg

My Chevy trucks, past and present:


1962 C10 SB Fleetside
1964 C10 LB Fleetside BBW
1966 C10 SB Fleetside
1966 C10 SB Fleetside BBW
1968 C10 SB Fleetside
1971 C10 LB Fleetside
1971 C10 SB Fleetside
1972 C10 SB Fleetside Cheyenne
1972 C10 SB Fleetside Cheyenne Super
1972 C10 LB Fleetside Cheyenne Super
1974 C20 Cheyenne
1979 K5 Blazer Cheyenne
1982 K10 SB Fleetside Custom Deluxe
1982 K10 SB Fleetside Scottsdale
1986 C10 SB Fleetside Silverado
2008 Silverado 1500 4x4
silvertonguedevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 08:49 AM   #37
Bamm
Cowboy Fan for Life!!!!!!
 
Bamm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Amelia, Virginia
Posts: 2,921
"Hey everybody, thanks for all of the information and replies. I think I'm just gonna bite the bullet and do it the right way."

You won't regret it........Jerry
__________________
1967 ShortBed Fleetside
3/4 Drop 350/700R4
Tilt wheel
18 x 8 Torque Thrust II's
Future mods: All new gauges & wood bed
My Zip is 23002
I ship UPS, USPS
Bamm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 09:30 AM   #38
Fred T
Cantankerous Geezer
 
Fred T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by silvertonguedevil
Hey everybody, thanks for all of the information and replies. I think I'm just gonna bite the bullet and do it the right way.
That's good news. Also, everyone missed the cheapest way to lower your truck. You let the air out of the tires!
__________________
Fred

There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.
Fred T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 09:32 AM   #39
hgs_notes
GEARHEAD
 
hgs_notes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 6,122
I did mine the simplest way I knew how back in 1987. I bought a new set of springs already calibrated for a 3.5" drop. I just replaced the springs all around, replaced the snubbers up front and I've been driving it ever since. I added a front sway bar from a 72 a short time later, not because I felt I needed it,m just because I wanted it. It did improve the handling through the corners though. It has one of the best rides I've ever had. I'm normally driving Tauruses and Impalas, etc for work, wife has a suburban, and this rides better hands down. It still has the shocks I bought before the drop. They were only a year or two old when I dropped it, so I left them. I still haul heavy loads with no problems and I pulled a boat for a while that was a 20 footer and weighed over 3000 lbs.

Now I'm afraid to "upgrade" to dropped spindles and slightly shorter springs because I'm afraid it will mess up the ride quality I've grown to love. The only things I want to do now is add about a 1" lowering block to the rear and replace all the bushings, etc and replace the shocks. I'm riding on Goodyear Eagle GTII's, 235-70-15 up front, 275-60-15 rear. I chose them because they had the highest load rating for the style and size when I was shopping, which was when I was pulling the boat. They have a stronger sidewall and so I think it effects the ride on the taller tires so its not so squishy feeling.

Good luck with your project. One thing to remember is that if you're not happy with it after a change, you can always make another change. Parts can be replaced and sold.

HG
hgs_notes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 04:56 PM   #40
Figment412
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 108
I would not recommend cutting coil springs as it would change the spring rate and change handeling.
__________________
Save your money and do it right the first time.

1968 GMC short bed
1972 Cab
74 SB Chevy running gear
Figment412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com