Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-28-2005, 04:23 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 995
|
Hmmm, trying to wrap my brain around this one. So the idea is to use
an electric fan instead of a engine driven fan to cool the system. This in turn would tax the engine less and improve performance. You would think this would be a popular mod if it had a decent increase. Does anyone have any info on improves HP/Torque? thanks!
__________________
1971 Chevy C10 Shortbed Stepside, 307v8 3-on-the-tree |
02-28-2005, 05:36 PM | #27 |
69 C-10 project
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Eastern, NC
Posts: 184
|
For informational value, some of the older farm tractors had no water pump and used natural circulation for cooling. I don't know how it works but have seen a couple.
__________________
69 C-10 Work is complete |
02-28-2005, 05:52 PM | #28 | |
Seņor Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
02-28-2005, 05:53 PM | #29 | |
I poop on Ford!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 295
|
Quote:
Given that it's pulley driven I would suspect you could see the same gains as installing an underdrive accessory pulley. Then add the fact that it is probably providing more resistance than an accessory when working to create air flow the gains would be more. My truck seems to get about 9-10mpg regardless of whether I'm driving in town or on the highway. When I removed the stock fan that didn't change much. Of course I've got my foot stuck half way down the carb on most trips so it really doesn't matter much.
__________________
1972 Chevy Cheyenne - LWB, factory 402BB 2005 Chevy Suburban LT 2006 Chrysler 300C - SRT8 |
|
02-28-2005, 05:53 PM | #30 | ||
Seņor Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
02-28-2005, 05:59 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Harvest, AL
Posts: 544
|
I'd be interested in seeing a before and after dyno pull maybe.
|
02-28-2005, 07:02 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,051
|
I have read between 5-15 hp but that's at 5000 rpm+ Just numbers But a dyno run would be the best.
Hey XXL ! Think you could get some before and after dyno munbers for us ??
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017 1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck 1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck" 2005 TAHOE DD |
02-28-2005, 07:37 PM | #33 | |
Car O'Holic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, Tx.
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|