Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-19-2006, 02:03 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ponca city now kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,221
|
Re: Just how bad are the brakes of 67-70's c10?
Quote:
I might have some wood in the back, and a occasionaly truck bed trailer behind it but that's it. No mountains in Oklahoma and me and my truck will be staying far away from brokeback mountain(jking). I was thinking of adding powerbrakes for now. It's seems like that will be a big help.. |
|
02-19-2006, 03:02 PM | #27 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: Just how bad are the brakes of 67-70's c10?
If you have discs,stay away from Brokeback Mountain.You could end up with a drum brake drivin`cowboy up your rear!
When I was younger,I had a`69 K/10 CST/CustomCamper with 37/14.50x15" tires.I drove it up and down the East Coast and out to Arizona and back,not to mention daily driving and alot of 4 wheelin`.Actually,alot of it was with a beer between my legs,a joint in one hand,and a cutey by my side.I was too dumb to know I couldn`t stop,so I never had a wreck.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 02-19-2006 at 03:13 PM. |
02-19-2006, 03:28 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estherville, Iowa
Posts: 3,371
|
Re: Just how bad are the brakes of 67-70's c10?
Both of my older trucks have the manual drum brakes. Now they are hardly ever fully loaded, but with normal pedal pressure, you can easily lock the front brakes and with a little more pressure, lock all 4 wheels. Now once the wheels are locked I don't think it makes any diffference whether you have disks or drums. The brakes are 11x2 which is pretty good size IMHO.
Now if you are going to haul 2-3000 pounds of stuff in the back or pull a trailer, or drive a lot of hills and mountains, disks WILL be better. But just crusin an empty truck will won't make much difference IMHO. Now if you want to talk about something that REALLY needs disks brakes, I used to own a 67 and a 68 big block chevelle. With a 140 mph top end, if you had to slow down fast, these only had a 9 inch drum up front IIRC, and really needed disk brakes.
__________________
1968 C10 307 3spd Long Fleet ------ http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=201103 1970 C10 305 Super T10 Long Fleet --- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=202285 1971 C20 383 TH350 Dana Posi ----- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=206894 2001 GMC Sierra 1500 C3 6.0 |
02-19-2006, 05:15 PM | #29 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Just how bad are the brakes of 67-70's c10?
3/4 ton and one ton trucks had a kick ass booster in comparison to the girly booster on a 1/2 ton. The master is also a differant design, but they aren't swapable and I don't know that it would do anything but make the brakes touchey anyways.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|