The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


View Poll Results: Which engine is better?
GM PP HT383 13 61.90%
Smeding Perfomance Torquer 383 3 14.29%
None of the above (what do you suggest?) 5 23.81%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2007, 05:10 PM   #26
IAFF2407
Registered User
 
IAFF2407's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: White Rock Canada
Posts: 865
Re: Which one's the better engine?

have you looked at Jasper engines, I believe the price is cheaper (could be wrong) 2 year warranty. remanufactured, not rebuilt.

Al.
IAFF2407 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:11 PM   #27
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70GMCer View Post
Just had my 350 block machined for 383. Included cleaned, 30 overbore and deck honed, notched for clearance and cam bearings installed for $418.00

The Scat 383 kit costs me $679.00 (crank, rods, pistons & rings, bearings, balancer/flywheel) All new Scat parts with Sealed Power pistons, (9.5 compression).

I already have Dart heads i'll be using. I plan on spending around $1200.00 when done. That's me putting it together. Get books and read up. It's pretty simple really. I have the short block already together.
Sounds like a great engine - think you'll get 400 FWHP? I'd have to think you'd be REAL close, depending on the cam.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:15 PM   #28
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I'd say closer to 500 at the flywheel and probably 400ish at the tires. 383's are the way to go. If you are rebuilding a 350, there is no reason not to spend a little extra dough and go 383.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:20 PM   #29
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Wow! I'm getting some great information here and I really appreciate all the help. Saving money is definitely a big bonus as I can then put the extra to the NV4500 and FI.

I guess I am just a bit timid because the tolerances in building engines see, so tight to me that I do not want to mess it up. I am definitely willi0ng to do it myself, just want to make sure I know what I am doing.

So my stock '72 350 block will be a good base to build a 383 out of?

Anyone know any good machine shops in VA?
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:23 PM   #30
jgrh64
Prestige member Old Farts Club
 
jgrh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 502
Re: Which one's the better engine?

The Smeding has dart heads - much better. Whoever does it make sure the block is magnafluxed, aligned honed decked and balanced this is usually extra but makes for a long lasting motor that you can beat on and not fail. you do not need 4 bolt main caps or exotic rods even a cast crank is fine unless you plan on reving above 7000 rpm or blower or nitrous motor.
__________________
Hey sombodys gotta do it!
jgrh64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:44 PM   #31
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70rs/ss View Post
I'd say closer to 500 at the flywheel and probably 400ish at the tires. 383's are the way to go. If you are rebuilding a 350, there is no reason not to spend a little extra dough and go 383.
Hmmm....must be a helluva cam and a GREAT pair of heads.

about the 383...but the only caveat is the cost of the crank if you have a servicable one.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:53 PM   #32
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Which one's the better engine?

A cast crank is like $250 ish for a stroker, it'll cost about $75-100 for a grind and polish. Dart heads flow alot of air. Carcraft did a stock 6.0 with a carb intake and a little cam and pulled down over 500 hp at the crank. Today 500 is like yesterdays, 300. It is a very reasonable achievement. Good heads and the correct cam/intake carb combo and 500 hp at the crank ought to be pretty easy. A mild 383 should do well over 400 hp at the crank. Remember at the crank and the tires are considerably different.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:03 PM   #33
PanelDeland
I am a Referee of life.
 
PanelDeland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,993
Re: Which one's the better engine?

For what it's worth,if you can find a 400 Block the extra cubes will net you a few more HP for about the same $$.It will also tame a cam a bit to have a little more cubes( a barely streetable cam in a 350 will be pretty mild in a 400).The 383 is a great torque motor and should do the job though.
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion.
You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape.
"My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!"
Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold!
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck"
"Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult'
"Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil"
PanelDeland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:24 PM   #34
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rust Buster View Post
Wow! I'm getting some great information here and I really appreciate all the help. Saving money is definitely a big bonus as I can then put the extra to the NV4500 and FI.

I guess I am just a bit timid because the tolerances in building engines see, so tight to me that I do not want to mess it up. I am definitely willi0ng to do it myself, just want to make sure I know what I am doing.

So my stock '72 350 block will be a good base to build a 383 out of?

Anyone know any good machine shops in VA?
Keep in mind that people have been rebuilding engines for a long time - and the tolerances are the job of the machine shop. Putting engines together is something anyone can do with a little care and patience.

Your stock '72 block is a perfect foundation for a solid 383. It's likely a "high nickel, high tin" '010 block which is a highly sought after block.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:31 PM   #35
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Is there anyway to tell for sure if my block is high nickel/tin? Something I can decode of the ID stamp?
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:35 PM   #36
jgrh64
Prestige member Old Farts Club
 
jgrh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 502
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I think it's behind the timing cover should be a 010 and a 020
__________________
Hey sombodys gotta do it!
jgrh64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:50 PM   #37
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70rs/ss View Post
A cast crank is like $250 ish for a stroker, it'll cost about $75-100 for a grind and polish. Dart heads flow alot of air. Carcraft did a stock 6.0 with a carb intake and a little cam and pulled down over 500 hp at the crank. Today 500 is like yesterdays, 300. It is a very reasonable achievement. Good heads and the correct cam/intake carb combo and 500 hp at the crank ought to be pretty easy. A mild 383 should do well over 400 hp at the crank. Remember at the crank and the tires are considerably different.
The CarCraft engine was an L92 GEN III - totally different situation and not a 383. 500 FWHP for a 383 is a pretty significant achievement and requires a fairly significant investment in a GEN I. 1 HP/CID takes a bit more than a "mild" engine. 18% is the generally accepted estimate for automatic transmission drivetrain loss.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 06:53 PM   #38
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgrh64 View Post
I think it's behind the timing cover should be a 010 and a 020
Yep; it's typically on the back of the block as well under the bellhousing. Pretty common for truck and high-performance engines of the period. If the casting number is 3970010 then you've got a pretty strong possibility.

Regardless, if the 350 is in and running it's likely suitable for a rebuild - and a 383.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 07:00 PM   #39
streetstar
Registered User
 
streetstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Moore, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,396
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Totally agree with everyone else -- stroker crank from SCAT is under $300 - but the kit is the best way to go --- Edelbrock Performer heads are anothe g-note, but you could get some cast iron Vortec heads for about $600. Add a good ignition system, headers and the 650-750 carb of your choice and you have a turnkey moor for less than 3 bills

Plus, gaining experience in the process can be fun
streetstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 07:37 PM   #40
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Well aware the 6.0 is a different monster, but it is completely stock form and if I'm not mistaken, the 5.7 350 and 6.0 aren't too far off in displacement as a matter of fact a 383 is very close to 6.0 in displacement. But still a 383 with good Dart heads and a mid sized cam and 500hp is not unobtainable (at the flywheel) I will bet 450 at the tires, as a matter of fact read the skip white article referenced in this thread (ebay link) they throw down over 450hp at the crank with a very mild cammed 383 with some no-name aluminum heads (the heads cost $700) and there cast cranked 383 kit @ 9:1 compression. Big cam, 10:1 or 11:1 compression (with aluminum heads this is OK) a 750 carb, good intake and now 500 hp is a slam dunk and high 500's possibly tip into the 600's is possible. Where is the desktop dyno guy. This is an easy deal to put together and not rocket science, and the DD should prove the 500hp number fairly easily.

Last edited by 70rs/ss; 06-06-2007 at 07:44 PM.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 07:50 PM   #41
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70rs/ss View Post
Well aware the 6.0 is a different monster, but it is completely stock form and if I'm not mistaken, the 5.7 350 and 6.0 aren't too far off in displacement as a matter of fact a 383 is very close to 6.0 in displacement. But still a 383 with good Dart heads and a mid sized cam and 500hp is not unobtainable (at the flywheel) I will bet 450 at the tires, as a matter of fact read the skip white article referenced in this thread (ebay link) they throw down over 450hp at the crank with a very mild cammed 383 with some no-name aluminum heads (the heads cost $700) and there cast cranked 383 kit @ 9:1 compression. Big cam, 10:1 or 11:1 compression (with aluminum heads this is OK) a 750 carb, good intake and now 500 hp is a slam dunk and high 500's possibly tip into the 600's is possible. Where is the desktop dyno guy. This is an easy deal to put together and not rocket science, and the DD should prove the 500hp number fairly easily.
GEN I and GEN III are completely different. If you want to shoot me your cam and head specs, I'd be happy to DD. Don't disagree that 500 FHPW is possible - but IMHO it's a heck of a lot more expensive than you suggest.

We can agree to disagree
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 07:52 PM   #42
eedgell
It's the air up here
 
eedgell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 710
Cool Re: Which one's the better engine?

I have built many strokers, its not that difficult really, but why dont you look for a good machine shop in your area, and visit with them about options. You could probably provide them your block and just have them build it for around $3000.00, I am guessing, and you can make more decisions about the build as it happens. Just a thought. Might be much less $'s than I stated too!!
__________________
1971 cheyenne k10 4 speed np 205 454 BB factory a/c

Never drink down stream of the herd!

Eric
eedgell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 08:50 PM   #43
PrinsGMC
Registered User
 
PrinsGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Redcliff Alberta
Posts: 46
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Build your own, its not too dificult. That way you can build it exactly how you want it and you can be proud that you didnt get it out of a catalog.
__________________
69 GMC lwb 1/2 Ton 396
76 Chevy k10 short step 4x4
PrinsGMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com