![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which engine is better? | |||
GM PP HT383 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 61.90% |
Smeding Perfomance Torquer 383 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 14.29% |
None of the above (what do you suggest?) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 23.81% |
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: White Rock Canada
Posts: 865
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
have you looked at Jasper engines, I believe the price is cheaper (could be wrong) 2 year warranty. remanufactured, not rebuilt.
Al. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
I'd say closer to 500 at the flywheel and probably 400ish at the tires. 383's are the way to go. If you are rebuilding a 350, there is no reason not to spend a little extra dough and go 383.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Wow! I'm getting some great information here and I really appreciate all the help. Saving money is definitely a big bonus as I can then put the extra to the NV4500 and FI.
I guess I am just a bit timid because the tolerances in building engines see, so tight to me that I do not want to mess it up. I am definitely willi0ng to do it myself, just want to make sure I know what I am doing. So my stock '72 350 block will be a good base to build a 383 out of? Anyone know any good machine shops in VA?
__________________
Maj USAF 71 K5 Blazer CST 72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI 71 K10 LWB 52 Dodge Power Wagon 67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon 48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon My Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Prestige member Old Farts Club
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 502
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
The Smeding has dart heads - much better. Whoever does it make sure the block is magnafluxed, aligned honed decked and balanced this is usually extra but makes for a long lasting motor that you can beat on and not fail. you do not need 4 bolt main caps or exotic rods even a cast crank is fine unless you plan on reving above 7000 rpm or blower or nitrous motor.
__________________
Hey sombodys gotta do it! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
A cast crank is like $250 ish for a stroker, it'll cost about $75-100 for a grind and polish. Dart heads flow alot of air. Carcraft did a stock 6.0 with a carb intake and a little cam and pulled down over 500 hp at the crank. Today 500 is like yesterdays, 300. It is a very reasonable achievement. Good heads and the correct cam/intake carb combo and 500 hp at the crank ought to be pretty easy. A mild 383 should do well over 400 hp at the crank. Remember at the crank and the tires are considerably different.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
I am a Referee of life.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,992
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
For what it's worth,if you can find a 400 Block the extra cubes will net you a few more HP for about the same $$.It will also tame a cam a bit to have a little more cubes( a barely streetable cam in a 350 will be pretty mild in a 400).The 383 is a great torque motor and should do the job though.
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion. You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape. "My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!" Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold! "You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck" "Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult' "Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Quote:
Your stock '72 block is a perfect foundation for a solid 383. It's likely a "high nickel, high tin" '010 block which is a highly sought after block. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Is there anyway to tell for sure if my block is high nickel/tin? Something I can decode of the ID stamp?
__________________
Maj USAF 71 K5 Blazer CST 72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI 71 K10 LWB 52 Dodge Power Wagon 67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon 48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon My Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Prestige member Old Farts Club
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 502
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
I think it's behind the timing cover should be a 010 and a 020
__________________
Hey sombodys gotta do it! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Yep; it's typically on the back of the block as well under the bellhousing. Pretty common for truck and high-performance engines of the period. If the casting number is 3970010 then you've got a pretty strong possibility.
Regardless, if the 350 is in and running it's likely suitable for a rebuild - and a 383. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Moore, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Totally agree with everyone else -- stroker crank from SCAT is under $300 - but the kit is the best way to go --- Edelbrock Performer heads are anothe g-note, but you could get some cast iron Vortec heads for about $600. Add a good ignition system, headers and the 650-750 carb of your choice and you have a turnkey moor for less than 3 bills
Plus, gaining experience in the process can be fun |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Well aware the 6.0 is a different monster, but it is completely stock form and if I'm not mistaken, the 5.7 350 and 6.0 aren't too far off in displacement as a matter of fact a 383 is very close to 6.0 in displacement. But still a 383 with good Dart heads and a mid sized cam and 500hp is not unobtainable (at the flywheel) I will bet 450 at the tires, as a matter of fact read the skip white article referenced in this thread (ebay link) they throw down over 450hp at the crank with a very mild cammed 383 with some no-name aluminum heads (the heads cost $700) and there cast cranked 383 kit @ 9:1 compression. Big cam, 10:1 or 11:1 compression (with aluminum heads this is OK) a 750 carb, good intake and now 500 hp is a slam dunk and high 500's possibly tip into the 600's is possible. Where is the desktop dyno guy. This is an easy deal to put together and not rocket science, and the DD should prove the 500hp number fairly easily.
Last edited by 70rs/ss; 06-06-2007 at 07:44 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Quote:
We can agree to disagree ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
It's the air up here
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 710
|
![]()
I have built many strokers, its not that difficult really, but why dont you look for a good machine shop in your area, and visit with them about options. You could probably provide them your block and just have them build it for around $3000.00, I am guessing, and you can make more decisions about the build as it happens. Just a thought. Might be much less $'s than I stated too!!
__________________
1971 cheyenne k10 4 speed np 205 454 BB factory a/c ![]() Never drink down stream of the herd! Eric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Redcliff Alberta
Posts: 46
|
Re: Which one's the better engine?
Build your own, its not too dificult. That way you can build it exactly how you want it and you can be proud that you didnt get it out of a catalog.
__________________
69 GMC lwb 1/2 Ton 396 76 Chevy k10 short step 4x4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|