![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Saint Peters, MO
Posts: 171
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Nice headers. What about the plug wires on #1 and #3?
__________________
68 c10 350/th350 winter daily driver 90 Nissan 180sx, sr20det gt2871r turbo, track car,summer daily driver "Just so we are reminded of those who are held back, Up front there ought to be a Man in Black". Johnny Cash. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Gearhead
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
I would try to get fittings to make the radiator 3/8" barbs as well, or adapt the trans to the smaller, but I think the larger lines are better. You should consider a seperate trans cooler as well. (if you arent already doing this) I used inverted flare AN adapters on my truck and ran 6AN (3/8") braided lines to handle the pressure and make them easy to remove for service.
Edit: Beautiful truck and awesome job on the swap!
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D 2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D 1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD! Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644 Last edited by 6772owner; 09-15-2010 at 09:30 AM. Reason: text |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Russellville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,699
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Try these and these. The adapter was from NAPA for the tranny lines to radiator, the wires from AutoZone, ordered for me.
Good luck. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 2,404
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Cool swap, great pictures!
Use a 3/8" pipe to AN-6 adapters at radiator cooler and 5/16" pipe to AN-6 adapters at the trans. Run AN-6 soft lines (appropriate for trans use) to the frame rail, and then AN-6 hardlines along the frame rail. If you're not familiar with AN - AN just means 1/16" inch, i.e. AN-6 = 6/16" = 3/8" Here's a little demo on how to make pipe-to-AN connections if you haven't done it before. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...5&postcount=28 Just a thought ![]() Last edited by Ticker; 09-15-2010 at 10:16 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 2,404
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
None of that stuff is particularly expensive, including the 3/8 hardline which can be brake line purchased from NAPA or something. The fittings are a couple of bucks each.
The all-rubber lines will work, but don't think they'll work for very long. You can't use just fuel tubing for trans lines. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piper, KS
Posts: 683
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
The "AN" stands for Air Force / Navy, its a military spec for how they joined flexable hose to a ridgid tube. The the dash sizes in increments of 1/16" are an NFPA and ISO standard that is used on many types of adapter styles such as JIC, JIS, BSPP, O-Ring Boss, ect... This will help when you try dealing with a true hydraulic shop to get what you are needing. Just FYI not trying to ruffle feathers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 2,404
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Actually, it's "Army/Navy"
![]() I use them for just about everything any more as the fittings and braided lines have become relatively inexpensive. Back when all this stuff was military specification ("MILSPEC") it was outrageously expensive - I have a couple of leftover AN-18 45 degree fittings for my airplane that were like $80 each. But now there are alternate brands to Aeroquip like Russel and others that aren't aircraft-ready but are just fine for automotive use...and so they're way cheaper. I just offered it as a thought; running long rubber lines can be problematic and using cheap hard lines (not stainless) can end up costing less and being a far-better long-term solution even if it does cost a bit more ![]() Last edited by Ticker; 09-16-2010 at 12:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
I think I'll try what you all are suggesting, but the only thing I can't figure out is how to go from AN tube nut to AN hose. There doesn't seem to be a -6 male AN to AN hose fitting. Probably a stupid question, but I can't find it at Summit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Gearhead
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,193
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Usually you have a Male fitting that goes on the end of your hose, that fitting then screws into the nut/sleeve after you have flared the line. I used a lot of the 3/8" aluminum tubing for my fuel system (F/I), you can also get male to male unions if you are using female fittings on your hose.
__________________
2002 Saturn SL2, My D/D 2019 Ford Fusion SE, Ecoboost - Wife's D/D 1993 Camaro Z28, A4, CAI, Cat-Back Exhaust Project C10 (my 72' C10 w/96' LT1, 700R4, bagged F&R, 18's (for now), Short/Fleet) -- SOLD! Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313644 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 2,404
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Quote:
![]() http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-900311/ This type of connection is typically done with a union or a bulkhead union to two female connections. ![]() ![]() Remember that we need to support any transition from hard to soft lines - they can't just hang in space or the line will work-harden from vibration and crack. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
I researched all of the parts needed to hook up the trans cooler lines as described above. The total comes out to $107 plus shipping for all of the parts and the 37 deg flare tool. I'm still weighing it out, if I want to spend the money or use my idea for now and plan on replacing it in the future. If anyone wants to do it here is the Summit parts list:
P# Qty needed EAR-581806ERL 1 EAR-581906ERL 1 FRA-481506 2 SUM-220690 4 SUM-230606 1 EAR-991907ERL 2 EAR-581905ERL 1 EAR-581805ERL 1 These parts are what I have found to be needed to hook up 4L60E cooler lines to the factory radiator. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: dallas ga
Posts: 1,505
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Just a suggestion but why not just install a cooler on the frame rail close to the trans? It would be about the same money and look sweet!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piper, KS
Posts: 683
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Just thought I'd mention that I got my shifter linkage all set up today. I used the Kugel Component linkage. I had to cut the rod down to 19.25" (took me several tries to get the right length) and place it at the position farthest out on the trans link.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
I also gutted the interior of the truck. I ordered a new AAW wiring harness, so it will all be new. The PO really hacked the old wiring to pieces. It was dangerous.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Master Procrastinator
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grande Prairie AB Canada
Posts: 1,128
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
![]()
__________________
![]() 20 Duramax tow pig 68 2wd short stepper project 77 2wd short fleet beater 52 short project |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Account Suspended
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Prunedale California
Posts: 782
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Kool swap... What kind of tranny shifting linkage are you using? You mentioned your engine is a 2008 meaning it has the displacement on demand feature, would there be any problems when reflashing your ECU? Would you still be able to use that feature for your swap without any problems?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 1,356
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Very cool swap. Thanks for posting all the pics. I'll tag along for the ride!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Quote:
John and Speartech says that the DOD will function and is not an issue. He is making my harness and setting up the computer for me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 163
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 163
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 610
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Those are the old gauges from the PO. They are all mechanical gauges, so I can't use them. I am probably going to sell those and go with the Auto Meter Arctic White electronic gauges from summit. They seem to be the best I can get for the money. I considered the Dolphin and TPI gauges, but their quality concerns me. What's your plan?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 163
|
Re: '67 5.3L Build Thread
Quote:
![]() I still have my factory ones, I heard from someone that Dolphin was not a good choice, dont know about TPI, But willl shop at my candy store (summit)to see what they offer (summit has been my supplier for must of my goodies, exept for the headers) ! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|