Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-14-2014, 07:15 AM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 156
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
The labor cost of dropping most of those motors in is going to be the same, drive a modern truck and an old truck and see what you like more. The newer ls motors put out great HP/torque but are very drivable. You can probably even squeak that old truck through CA emissions. Throw in a overdrive tyranny. When it comes to looks, do a Google image search of this site and follow the trail. I like your truck, by the way. I even like that your dad repainted it. If it were mine, I'd clear coat right over the whole thing.
|
03-14-2014, 10:28 AM | #27 | |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
Not sure what this has to do with a pickup truck,but maybe there's some good perspective to be found here that will help. How about,either way you go you'll be happy. Once you decide,just do it how you like and you can't go wrong
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
|
03-14-2014, 10:58 AM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mohave valley,arizona
Posts: 1,088
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
if looking for opinions,
my opinion is to go with the mostly stock look, with upgrades for better driveability,power,brakes, etc. suttle changes here and there and a hair bit of the 'personal touch'. i never like to do anything also that isnt reversable( like cutting body parts and going crazy)
__________________
1969 Shortbed in progress 1982 short step, few suspension and motor upgrades.getting a 468 1978 Shortbed fleet side bonanza fully loaded 1978 k20 Silverado loaded.currently engine-less 1989 k10 suburban 9" lift 65 nova And more |
03-14-2014, 11:00 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mohave valley,arizona
Posts: 1,088
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
and make a build thread with lots of pictures so we can feast our eyes and curiosity
__________________
1969 Shortbed in progress 1982 short step, few suspension and motor upgrades.getting a 468 1978 Shortbed fleet side bonanza fully loaded 1978 k20 Silverado loaded.currently engine-less 1989 k10 suburban 9" lift 65 nova And more |
03-14-2014, 11:03 AM | #30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Posts: 3,506
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
__________________
-Duane C/10 Club Texas member 1971 Chevy C10 "Brutus" SWB Fleetside 2016 6.0L (L96) 6L90E (driver/project) 1965 Pontiac GTO "Royal Goat" 400/TH400 w/AC (my baby) |
|
03-14-2014, 11:04 AM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Thanks all for the opinions! I know its an awkward question - as some have pointed out I need to just do what I want - but this has really helped me a lot so far!
I am nearly 100% set now on going stock cosmetically, with a crate motor/some extra chrome under the hood (it'll give me something to polish each weekend ) I might - I didn't want to detract through from REAL build threads. Lots of guys here do some very impressive things in their garage. My build thread will last 4 to 6 months and each post would read "stopped by the shop again... photos of progress" |
03-14-2014, 11:05 AM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Speaking of going stock...
Can anyone help me find a photo of a 505 green truck WITH both side moldings? I have scoured the internet for weeks as I plan out this project, and for the life of me the only 505's I can find have no trim, or have the white dual paint.... |
03-14-2014, 11:13 AM | #33 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2014, 11:44 AM | #34 |
The Niner
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Broad Brook, CT
Posts: 2,500
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
I kept mine stock for the most part on the outside, the interior is a mix between stock and custom, but I did a bunch of stuff under the hood to my own tastes.
__________________
"A good racer is one whose head is in communication with his balls." - Richie Evans 1970 C/20 - 402/TH400/3.54s - 74K miles 2003 GMC Sierra 2500 - Wheatland Yellow Niner Progression Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=697183 Classic Trucks article: https://www.motortrend.com/features/...et-c20-driven/ |
03-14-2014, 11:49 AM | #35 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
Do you recall where your seat cover / inside door panels came from? I was thinking about adding in grey inside to tone down the 'green everywhere' action... |
|
03-14-2014, 11:55 AM | #36 | |
The Niner
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Broad Brook, CT
Posts: 2,500
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
Sorry, I have no idea about the interior. It was a California restoration. It's a mix of tweed and leather. Someday I'd like to go back to stock appearing door panels. The guy I got my truck from is from Shingle Springs. He has a candy store in old Sacramento.
__________________
"A good racer is one whose head is in communication with his balls." - Richie Evans 1970 C/20 - 402/TH400/3.54s - 74K miles 2003 GMC Sierra 2500 - Wheatland Yellow Niner Progression Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=697183 Classic Trucks article: https://www.motortrend.com/features/...et-c20-driven/ |
|
03-14-2014, 12:01 PM | #37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2014, 12:49 PM | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria, B.C
Posts: 3,794
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
You're getting some great advice and tips here.
Remember....keep it simple and the chances for success go up. I would definitely agree with overdrive trans. recommendations and the 3:42 rear. The 2/4 drop is also a nice adder BUT do not throw away any of the original parts and do not 'cut' the truck or frame up IMHO...you can never get that back. Disc brakes on the front...absolutely and make sure you have at least the front sway bar on there and maybe add a back one. Exterior....I'd stay stock in appearance in terms of color ranges/schemes and trims. Options...here is where the comfort begins, add some more sound insulation in the cab, a/c system, tilt wheel and a good sound system. Then maybe consider some nice seating options if you don't like the stock seat. Lots of guys have some good input and examples of this. Drivetrain: well you are going to get lots of takes on this. The 290hp with a few adders to it will give some nice power for the truck...but we don't know how you drive or what you expect. One mans 'power/performance' rating is a 'weak' motor to another guy. Oh importantly...and this is important. Remember once you start spending over $20k on the truck/resto....do not expect to retrieve that money on sale day. The odds of ever getting back that bigger investment are near zero....unless you are Chip Foose...LOL. A lot of guys want the next guy to pay their resto bills....and it just doesn't happen or wash out that way on sale day. So be very aware of what you are spending and be very comfortable with it being a labor of family love and heritage...because the investment factor will not be there from a financial point of view....do it to enjoy the truck! Nice truck by the way!.... Coley
__________________
....for some men, there is experience, skill and effort....for the others...there is visa and UPS LOL 1966 Chevy 1/2 ton (Florida- Red/white) 1972 Chevy 1/2 ton (California- Blue/white) 2005 Chevy Silverado HD2500/Duramax 2000 Dodge Ram 1500 |
03-14-2014, 01:10 PM | #39 |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
No one has asked... what is that 35K getting you? Is there a "budget" for motor/trans replacement/rebuild? Front suspension rebuild/upgrade (lowering, disc brakes, etc)
GM crates range in price from 1300 to 4 or 5 grand. For a driver, I'd go with a GM 350 with just an edelbrock intake, 700R4 overdrive, 3.73 rear axle, and A/C.
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! |
03-14-2014, 01:22 PM | #40 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
Quote:
Good question - the 35k is the target budget for the entire frame off restore. (Dissasembly, media blasting, powder-coating, liner, disc brake conversion, new powertrain, reassembly, and a wicked paint job [the specialty of the shop is paint]) Basically - the entire restore. There are still details to hash out - im actually headed up to the shop this afternoon to talk several things over with them. I won't lie, some of these questions have me concerned. Am I overpaying in this process? I did compare shops, but perhaps I am looking at the wrong 'type' of shop for creating a daily driver vs. show car or somesuch? |
||
03-14-2014, 02:15 PM | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 3,016
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Ask the shop for references. If provided, call them and talk with them about the shop's quality, experience had etc...(maybe even ask if you can come see their truck/car in person to inspect yourself). If none provide, shop around some more.
__________________
project: "my happy mess" |
03-14-2014, 02:29 PM | #42 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Millington. TN
Posts: 74
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
I had a 67 in high school a hated that I sold it !! But not some 20 some odd years later I have another one I'm building !! I say build it how you want with out doing something to it you can't change parts back and it's stock again !!! The 5lug change over is best for safety to me cause by saying 5lug I mean disc brakes all the way around !!! Then the mods you were saying didn't seem like to me you was hurting the truck !! This way you can really enjoy your ride because you built it the way you wanted and you can still change it back to stock !! Like if you cut the frame to make a short bed out of it or chopped the top 3/4 inches then your stuck with the truck that's a family thing that can't be Chang back without it not being the same truck they had !!!!
|
03-14-2014, 03:13 PM | #43 |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Ask the shop for an estimated parts list and labor costs.
No, 35K is not unreasonable for a 100% tear it down, make it new and pretty truck, but I would expect much better than driver quality. Just don't be shocked when it's only worth 15k when done. I wouldn't be surprised at all if 15K or more is just for parts (especially adding in motor/trans). Parts add up QUICK! I just spent over 2 grand on new seat foams/covers, carpet, radiator, a few small parts, and suspension upgrades for a 66 mustang.
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! Last edited by 67ChevyRedneck; 03-14-2014 at 03:23 PM. |
03-14-2014, 03:18 PM | #44 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 7,503
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
Glad to be of help. Are there any other stock build questions that come to mind? Also many people are making axle ratio recommendations so I figured you would like to know that your truck was built with a 3.07:1 ratio. Don't forget to put yor truck's birthday on the calender January 20,1969.
__________________
Thanks, Tim * VIN/Model Decoders * Power Team Charts (engine/transmission/gear ratio) * Post Your Pickup SPID ** Blazer SPID ** Suburban/Panel SPID * RTFM ... Read The Factory Manuals... download 'em here Highlanders ** Do you have a 1972 Plaid Pickup? ** Plaid Blazer ** Plaid Suburban Last edited by SS Tim; 03-14-2014 at 03:36 PM. |
|
03-14-2014, 04:34 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
My opinion...
Mostly just a stock rebuild to keep the heirloom/originality of the truck. Such as: Stock repaint - I like the two-tone lose the mirrors, go with the stock small mirrors reuse/replace all stock chrome Chrome bumpers Front & Rear 350/290? w/TH350 (overdrive optional) with 3.73 rear-end gear (posi or limited slip optional) lower it either 2.5" or 3" front and 4" or 5" rear Add front sway bar if doesn't have one. convert to disc brakes front & 5 lug axle in rear. add GM Rally wheels painted stock silver/grey color Then again this is kind of my thought on any of our 67-72 trucks Do not tell the shop your budget up front or they will charge you that. I thinking 20K would go a very long way on this project. Hell... your in Sacramento, CA. There should be quite a few members here in that area that can recommend someplace that will bring you in under budget. Worst case.. take a drive to Early Classic Enterprises in Fresno, CA. They would be a great stop for info, ideas and knowledge. I think "C/10 King" (member here) is somewhat nearby you as well. Look at his collection of trucks. He has numerous directions and possibilities to help your decision.
__________________
My Trucks: 1967 Chevrolet Short Wide Box 327 TH350 9" w/3.90 gears paint will be White - Current Project 1967 Chevrolet Custom LWB 283 TH400 3.73 Posi, no-AC, no-PS, no-PB, bench-seat, small-window - mostly orig driver 1967 Chevrolet CST LWB originally a 327 TH400 3.73 Posi AC PS PB, had Buddy Buckets, Small Window - parts truck 1967 Chevrolet CST LWB, 283 MT 3.73 had Buddy Buckets, Panoramic Window - parts truck 2001 Chevrolet 3500 2WD Crew Cab Dually 8.1L Allison White Last edited by 67 cst swb; 03-14-2014 at 04:49 PM. |
03-14-2014, 04:45 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Quote:
Just my opinion
__________________
My Trucks: 1967 Chevrolet Short Wide Box 327 TH350 9" w/3.90 gears paint will be White - Current Project 1967 Chevrolet Custom LWB 283 TH400 3.73 Posi, no-AC, no-PS, no-PB, bench-seat, small-window - mostly orig driver 1967 Chevrolet CST LWB originally a 327 TH400 3.73 Posi AC PS PB, had Buddy Buckets, Small Window - parts truck 1967 Chevrolet CST LWB, 283 MT 3.73 had Buddy Buckets, Panoramic Window - parts truck 2001 Chevrolet 3500 2WD Crew Cab Dually 8.1L Allison White |
|
03-14-2014, 05:30 PM | #47 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 20,036
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Exactly. But it sounds like it's too late for that.
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed. 1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck. RIP ElJay RIP 67ChevyRedneck RIP Grumpy Old Man RIP FleetsidePaul |
03-14-2014, 06:27 PM | #48 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
Posts: 274
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Welcome from another Sacramento guy, Lots of locals on the forum.
If you haven’t “inked” a deal with a builder yet send me a PM, I know of a few shops that specialize in rest-mod type builds. Not paint Shops...But full restorations, that is what you want IMO. |
03-14-2014, 07:41 PM | #49 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 3,016
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
^ x2 Good opinion.
__________________
project: "my happy mess" |
03-14-2014, 10:21 PM | #50 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: warren oregon
Posts: 117
|
Re: Mostly stock vs. significant mods; Daily Driver
Here is mine mostly stock, (MUST BE A SIGN OF OLD AGE) 1971 gmc with factory 402, and a/c
|
Bookmarks |
|
|