09-22-2022, 11:58 AM | #26 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: 1963 gmc b napco
I thought I was a GMC man but now I know I am. I love the look of the B-model nose. It was ahead of it's time comparing it to what we have now. I also have a thing about truck cabs and the many applications of the same cab. I read the cab is one of the most expensive parts on a truck to produce. It shows in their varied use of the same cab. International supplied cabs to quite a few other truck mfgrs. I think Brockways ended up using Mack cabs toward the end. Heck, all the years Astros and Generals were made I never realized they used the same came sheet metal. And the funny thing is the conventional uses the COE cab, is how it looks.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
09-23-2022, 10:25 AM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Brandon Manitoba Canada
Posts: 68
|
Re: 1963 gmc b napco
It doesn’t really surprise me to learn that the cab is the most expensive part of building a truck. The heavy presses to stamp out the sheet metal and the rest of the detail could add up. I like the look of all the GMC trucks, yes even the crackerbox. Ford also built big trucks like the N series and the Louisville, and like the GMC they were less money than a Mack or KW. But they would not stand up to the daily rigours of logging or other off road use.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|