The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > Heavy Haulers

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2022, 11:58 AM   #26
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: 1963 gmc b napco

I thought I was a GMC man but now I know I am. I love the look of the B-model nose. It was ahead of it's time comparing it to what we have now. I also have a thing about truck cabs and the many applications of the same cab. I read the cab is one of the most expensive parts on a truck to produce. It shows in their varied use of the same cab. International supplied cabs to quite a few other truck mfgrs. I think Brockways ended up using Mack cabs toward the end. Heck, all the years Astros and Generals were made I never realized they used the same came sheet metal. And the funny thing is the conventional uses the COE cab, is how it looks.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2022, 10:25 AM   #27
Rubbertiredtramp
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Brandon Manitoba Canada
Posts: 68
Re: 1963 gmc b napco

It doesn’t really surprise me to learn that the cab is the most expensive part of building a truck. The heavy presses to stamp out the sheet metal and the rest of the detail could add up. I like the look of all the GMC trucks, yes even the crackerbox. Ford also built big trucks like the N series and the Louisville, and like the GMC they were less money than a Mack or KW. But they would not stand up to the daily rigours of logging or other off road use.
Rubbertiredtramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com