The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board > projects and builds

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-2020, 04:42 PM   #51
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by vet57air View Post
So this what I did for tire clearance. I cut 5/8" out and left 1/2". I then welded some 3/16" x 1/2" FB on top for added strength. By leaving the 1/2" I didn't cut through any spot welds. The braces then had to be lengthened and welded. Seems like a lot of work but if you have a large wheel and tire (31" tall) at this ride height you need all the room you can get.
Yep. Thats what I had in mind. Trim back just to the edge of the spot welds (~.625") and reinforce the remaining lip for reassurance. I haven't decided on bolt-in or welding the reinforcement.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2020, 09:24 PM   #52
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Almost done my fabricating, details. Battery box and transmission cooler mount.
Name:  a.jpg
Views: 1130
Size:  33.4 KB

Name:  b.jpg
Views: 1127
Size:  27.1 KB
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 08:16 PM   #53
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Please help. Going out of my mind with my rear wheels. They are 22 x 12. I went with this backspace because sometimes when you have little backspace you loose the look of the wheel as all you see is lip. Not sure if I have enough lip. Am willing to change out the rear wheels but I cannot make up my mind. What do you think? Opinions...
Name:  drivers.jpg
Views: 990
Size:  48.5 KB

Name:  pass.jpg
Views: 990
Size:  46.8 KB
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 08:41 PM   #54
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Looks good from here.
What are the F/R back space numbers?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 10:00 PM   #55
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Looks good from here.
What are the F/R back space numbers?
F is 5.5 on a 9" wheel. Has clearance lock to lock, at this ride height.
R is 7 on a 12" wheel. If I change it would go down to 4" backspace.
Name:  90.jpg
Views: 984
Size:  50.9 KB
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 12:23 AM   #56
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by vet57air View Post
F is 5.5 on a 9" wheel. Has clearance lock to lock, at this ride height.
R is 7 on a 12" wheel. If I change it would go down to 4" backspace.
Yikes.... 4" backspacing on a 12" wheel is closing in on race car/Pro Street territory. I'm ok w/about 4"BS on a 10. Beyond that the wheel detail seems to be lost (especially on these 6x-66 trucks). So 10"/4"bs; 11"/5"bs; 12"/6"bs.... You're pretty much spot-on where I feel the 'look' is now but thats a personal thing.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 10:12 AM   #57
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Yikes.... 4" backspacing on a 12" wheel is closing in on race car/Pro Street territory. I'm ok w/about 4"BS on a 10. Beyond that the wheel detail seems to be lost (especially on these 6x-66 trucks). So 10"/4"bs; 11"/5"bs; 12"/6"bs.... You're pretty much spot-on where I feel the 'look' is now but thats a personal thing.
Thank you for your opinion. Those were some of the reasons I went the way I did. Yes it is a personal thing, but want to see what others think.
I want my truck to handle. Yes 22's are not optimal for that, but I like the look. My front track width is 59" so when designing my frame I went with 59" for the axle because somewhere I read this is good. Set the B.S. on the wheels to fit my suspension. ( some do it the other way around).

Last edited by vet57air; 04-08-2020 at 10:51 AM.
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 10:56 AM   #58
aggie91
I'm just glad to be here!
 
aggie91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 4,788
Re: Cgt project

Personally I like your set up now with the lesser lip so the detail of the wheel center is more clearly seen. I agree with Scoti's comments on bs measurements.

I think the big lip trend is going to play out at sometime, but the lesser lip/more center detail is timeless.
__________________
Karl



1965 Chevy Stepside(Grandpa's Old Blue) and (July 2015 Shop Build!)(2020, the Saga Continues)
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=372424

The LST Challenge:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post7812257

Korbin's 1st Square: "Sunburn"
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=418618

1985 GMC Sierra: "White Trash", Korbin's 2nd now...
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=632305

Henry - 1984 Chevrolet, Owen's 1st Square
aggie91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 11:45 AM   #59
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by vet57air View Post
Thank you for your opinion. Those were some of the reasons I went the way I did. Yes it is a personal thing, but want to see what others think.
I want my truck to handle. Yes 22's are not optimal for that, but I like the look. My front track width is 59" so when designing my frame I went with 59" for the axle because somewhere I read this is good. Set the B.S. on the wheels to fit my suspension. ( some do it the other way around).
My plan (according to MY math) is 10.5" w/4"BS on the rear. I know the housing is ~58" but I can't remember if that was w/the rotors on or not when I measured for a 'true' WMS-to-WMS dimension. So..... It could be it was slightly over the 58" mark. I know I'm under 59" max.

My front track width should be 60-61" (OE truck disc brake fronts @ 64; PB Dropmember -1.5", PB 1" narrowed arms, & CPP modular spindles -.5 x2= 60.5"). Wheels will be 8-9" w/5.25 - 5.50"BS.

I think your set-up will work well.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 01:43 PM   #60
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
My plan (according to MY math) is 10.5" w/4"BS on the rear. I know the housing is ~58" but I can't remember if that was w/the rotors on or not when I measured for a 'true' WMS-to-WMS dimension. So..... It could be it was slightly over the 58" mark. I know I'm under 59" max.

My front track width should be 60-61" (OE truck disc brake fronts @ 64; PB Dropmember -1.5", PB 1" narrowed arms, & CPP modular spindles -.5 x2= 60.5"). Wheels will be 8-9" w/5.25 - 5.50"BS.

I think your set-up will work well.
What diameter wheels will you run? What year of truck?
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 03:20 PM   #61
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by vet57air View Post
What diameter wheels will you run? What year of truck?
20's & it's a 64 short fleet.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 12:18 PM   #62
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Finally received the parts I needed for the steering. Never had to use 4 joints before ( two doubles). My frame manufacturer laid back the rack making the conntection more complicated.
Name:  steering.jpg
Views: 818
Size:  30.5 KB
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 05:18 PM   #63
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Wow.... You had to utilize two different support bearings.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2020, 07:45 PM   #64
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Wow.... You had to utilize two different support bearings.
For every universal over 2 you need a support bearing. Would have been dead easy if the frame guy had the rack mounted "straight up" rather than angled.
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2020, 12:27 AM   #65
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by vet57air View Post
For every universal over 2 you need a support bearing. Would have been dead easy if the frame guy had the rack mounted "straight up" rather than angled.
I guess they figured exhaust would be easier w/the steering routed low & under the motor-mount tower.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2020, 09:20 PM   #66
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Doing body gaps. Pretty happy with door and fender gaps. Have the hood and cowl pieces left. I like the gap between the hood and fenders but the cowl is high. Anyone have any tricks besides me slicing the cowl piece?
Name:  Hood.jpg
Views: 768
Size:  30.3 KB
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 06:34 AM   #67
Hammered 77
Registered User
 
Hammered 77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pendleton, Indiana
Posts: 235
Re: Cgt project

Just found your build. Nice work!! Do you have enough clearance to allow for a 4" back space on the rear wheel?

Rick
Hammered 77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 11:33 AM   #68
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammered 77 View Post
Just found your build. Nice work!! Do you have enough clearance to allow for a 4" back space on the rear wheel?

Rick
Yes
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2020, 11:52 PM   #69
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

My new full time job.....my body and paint. Done all the body work and gaps. Just put some high build on the cab and now some blocking.Name:  Primer.jpg
Views: 633
Size:  41.6 KB
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 01:10 AM   #70
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,612
Re: Cgt project

Nice, How did I miss this?
Warrens69GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 09:53 AM   #71
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Well.... I guess that's good. Work detail should easily pass ownership QC. But then again I've heard when the same person wears both hats (owner & QC) there can be a struggle.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 10:34 AM   #72
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Well.... I guess that's good. Work detail should easily pass ownership QC. But then again I've heard when the same person wears both hats (owner & QC) there can be a struggle.
Don't get me wrong, I hate body work. I do it out of necessity. I'm pretty picky detailed kind of guy and can't afford to pay someone to do it.
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 11:13 AM   #73
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by vet57air View Post
Don't get me wrong, I hate body work. I do it out of necessity. I'm pretty picky detailed kind of guy and can't afford to pay someone to do it.
I get it. I can/have done body-work so I understand what it takes and learned because I knew I wouldn't be able to pay the going rate for the quality I expected.

My #1 problem always was knowing when to stop & that it was 'good'. Heck, it still is. This also is a factor in why I seek out clean, patina, survivors so I can live w/how it came from GM
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 11:39 AM   #74
vet57air
Registered User
 
vet57air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 206
Re: Cgt project

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
I get it. I can/have done body-work so I understand what it takes and learned because I knew I wouldn't be able to pay the going rate for the quality I expected.

My #1 problem always was knowing when to stop & that it was 'good'. Heck, it still is. This also is a factor in why I seek out clean, patina, survivors so I can live w/how it came from GM
I get what your saying. I did consider buying a nice original paint SWB truck but the price kind of killed that, not to mention all the mods I wanted to do didn't make it practical. I have come to grips with building a show worthy truck and driving the wheels off it. Truthfully I have done this before. I just had to get it clear in my mind that when you drive it, **** happens..... then you fix it. My 1954 COE Tourliner is a good example. I finished it 10 years ago and have put 20,000 miles on it and it still looks fresh.
[ATTACH][/ATTACH]
Attached Images
 
vet57air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 03:13 PM   #75
88Stanger
Registered User
 
88Stanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,651
Re: Cgt project

Beautiful work, its as simple as that.
88Stanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com