|
09-03-2014, 07:41 PM
|
#51 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
It's hard to beat a brand new motor that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
09-04-2014, 04:20 PM
|
#52 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Do you think they could have designed the air conditioning compressor to need any MORE brackets?
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2014, 04:36 PM
|
#53 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
You could ditch it and get the serpentine setup at a salvage yard. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2014, 04:43 PM
|
#54 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
__________________
Built not bought! My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless! Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding  My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
09-06-2014, 06:09 PM
|
#55 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
All the Edelbrock parts have arrived! Great deal on the intake from Jegs for $150 with the install kit. The air cleaner was free with the carburetor purchase, and it came with a free t-shirt too!
Anyone know if I can use the stock throttle and transmission cable brackets? |
|
|
|
|
09-06-2014, 06:19 PM
|
#56 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
A lot of parts cleaning has been done, though it seems like there is always more to do. I want it to look mostly stock, so I plan to use the original valve covers and paint the Edelbrock intake orange with the rest of the block. All the brackets and pulleys will be black like original.
Here's a few pics: |
|
|
|
|
09-06-2014, 07:03 PM
|
#57 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ennis, TX
Posts: 18
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Nice C20. I like the 8 luggers. Thanks for the detailed pics. Probably a good move on the crate engine. Hard to beat the crate price unless you are doing all rebuild work yourself.
__________________
62' C10 72' C30 Dually 81' C10 90' 454SS 07' Duramax 
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2014, 09:57 AM
|
#58 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
If anyone is interested, I just put up a new photo gallery with all these photos and a bunch more - http://www.jimbosprint.com/ChevyC20 |
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2014, 03:18 PM
|
#59 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,727
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Great gallery you have there .
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 04:08 PM
|
#60 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Getting the transmission crossmember out was a battle!
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 04:58 PM
|
#61 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
 It doesn't matter how many rivets you remove it never gets any easier, it's easily my least favorite part of working on the frame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 08:40 PM
|
#62 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Crate is here!
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 09:02 PM
|
#63 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Gm 10067353
Last edited by jimbosprint; 09-09-2014 at 09:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 09:53 PM
|
#64 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,727
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
That crate looks very familiar ,you wont regret it ,very good motor for the money .
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 10:31 PM
|
#65 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
09-13-2014, 09:23 PM
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
I got the intake and old valve covers installed onto the new motor today. Almost ready for the Chevrolet Orange engine paint.
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 06:36 PM
|
#67 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Wow! Calyx sure makes old exhaust manifolds look great!
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 07:38 PM
|
#68 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
Are you running stock mannifolds, or are you gonna run headers?
__________________
Built not bought! My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless! Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 07:47 PM
|
#69 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
The Calyx is a graphite paste manifold dressing (not paint), it's not supposed to burn off and it should be easy to touch up. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it does. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 08:08 PM
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,727
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
I used the Calyx on my wife's Malibu and my truck manifolds ,still holding up well after several years and many ,many miles .They do need a little touch up this winter .
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 08:13 PM
|
#71 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Is it a spray? And how well does it work on headers? Or is it for cast only?
__________________
Built not bought! My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless! Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion |
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 08:24 PM
|
#72 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
It's a paste. I used a rag and just rubbed it in like a polish. Only for cast. I think the photo above makes it look a little more shiny than it really is. I think it looks darker and more like cast metal than the photo shows too.
Eastwood.com Calyx Manifold Coating |
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 08:30 PM
|
#73 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Just finished the other one.
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 08:49 PM
|
#74 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 941
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-15-2014, 09:29 PM
|
#75 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,727
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Once installed and heated unless you want to heat them in your oven they should retain their color for a long time .
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 1972, c20, deluxe, stock |
|
|
Linear Mode
