The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2005, 09:08 PM   #51
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by valleycustom
Nope. This truck is going to be a driver. I can't stand it when people have cars they don't drive. What's the point of having it?
Amen!
Attached Images
 
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 10:12 PM   #52
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musclerodz
My bad, I did not notice the upper diagonal until now. With the amount of travel you are planning, I assume you have some type of spherical bearings at both ends to eliminate enevitable binding associated with running diagonal bars?

Mike
The bars I have in the picture I use for mock up. I have another set made up for this truck with Johnny joints on each end.
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 10:16 PM   #53
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by a squarecan
Man I wish I have a 10th of the skills you have man! You could make a killing building frames for people! People would have you booked for months waiting for your next crazy creation. How long have you been working on this frame?

Keith
I've been working on this frame for about 18 months. That's only part time after my day job. I have also been doing other projects on the side. I could probably do one of these in a month to a month and a half. That would be working full time.

Thanks
Jr
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 10:19 PM   #54
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXL
Amen!
You're the first person to hit the nail right on the head. I see people making frame rails all day long and I don't see gussets, and I think damn that would suck if that thing came apart while your doing 70 down the freeway. You can never be to safe. I also don't want a law suit on my hands.

Last edited by valleycustom; 09-16-2005 at 10:33 PM.
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 10:25 PM   #55
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
I would like to thank everyone on the comments... If anyone is near Modesto Ca hit me up. Or you can see this truck in a mag some day.

Last edited by valleycustom; 09-16-2005 at 10:26 PM.
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 10:37 PM   #56
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
valleycustom, just reiderating what everyone else has said, simply incredible work!!! im very curious as to your background, it seems building a frame like this would take a tremendous amount of knowledge or experience in engineering. id like to be able to build something like this one day, but just dont have enough knowledge or confidence to attempt it.
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 10:59 PM   #57
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by milehightoyz
valleycustom, just reiderating what everyone else has said, simply incredible work!!! im very curious as to your background, it seems building a frame like this would take a tremendous amount of knowledge or experience in engineering. id like to be able to build something like this one day, but just dont have enough knowledge or confidence to attempt it.
Well durning the day I'm a system administrator for a ambulance company. So I use this to burn off steam. I've been working on cars for over 12 years now and I'm only 26. I couldn't afford to pay other people to fix my cars so I started to do it myself. Then I bought some books and learned to weld and it just went from there. I know some people that have been doing this for years so I just watched and learned. The most important thing is to measure ,measure and measure some more. Being off more than 1/8" will turn everything into a nightmare. "I learned that building a frame on jackstands doesn't work". This is the third version of this frame. You can see the picture on the first page. That was the first version. I finally built a frame table that made my life eaiser. Really once you learn to setup the front end geometry and the rear end geometry it's cake from there.

Last edited by valleycustom; 09-16-2005 at 11:01 PM.
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 11:04 PM   #58
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
what goes into building a frame table? is it built custom for each frame or is it a basic template like a jig? sorry for all the questions. i find this very interesting and would like to learn more about it. thanks again.
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 11:12 PM   #59
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by milehightoyz
what goes into building a frame table? is it built custom for each frame or is it a basic template like a jig? sorry for all the questions. i find this very interesting and would like to learn more about it. thanks again.
Not a problem. I am the same way. The only way to learn is to ask questions. A frame table is a big ass jig. This table is setup for any frame up to 36" wide and 15' long. I plan on making it bigger to compensate for the newer frames because they are wider. My table is made of 3x3" box steel 1/4" wall. The most important thing about the table is that it's square. I welded adjusters on the feet of the table to level it out on any floor.

Last edited by valleycustom; 09-16-2005 at 11:12 PM.
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 11:37 PM   #60
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
awesome. thanks for the info, any pictures of the entire frame table? i can see just bits and pieces in your frame pics. also, do you use mostly tig or mig on your frames? your welds look great.
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 11:47 PM   #61
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by milehightoyz
awesome. thanks for the info, any pictures of the entire frame table? i can see just bits and pieces in your frame pics. also, do you use mostly tig or mig on your frames? your welds look great.
Most of my welds are TIG. I only use the mig on the joining parts of the frame rails. Everything else is TIG welded. I will get some pictures of the table and post them.

Jr
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 02:31 AM   #62
kevncar
Active Member
 
kevncar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atwater, CA
Posts: 259
I've been by jr's house to check this truck out. If you think it's awesome in these pics, you've got to see it in person. Hit him up if your local and go check it out.
__________________
Kevin

72 Chevelle

67 C10...454/TH400
Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=193961
kevncar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 12:12 PM   #63
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
Man everytime I sign in I always come back to check this thread out because I am so impressed with your fab skills! Same pix each time and everytime I am still drooling over them. Being 19 and wanting to some day make a career of what your doing now do you have any advice on what a young kid should do? I know you mentioned practice and lots of it, but how in the hell did you learn about all the geometry involved? I plan to go to WyoTech next year to take chassis fab along with alomst everything else involved, but I am curious if you had any sources to learn what is involved with frame geometry?

Thanks
Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 01:27 PM   #64
GenIIIShorty
JUNK COLLECTOR!!!!!
 
GenIIIShorty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 514
Yeah, the fabrication is just beautiful.....
__________________
baby
The dark side! 2000 XLT PSD F-250 4x4! Offroad package
1970 C10 Short-step soon to be short fleet, maybe? Corvette in truck's clothing in work! Corvette IFS, IRS, TPI and Doug Nash 4+3
GenIIIShorty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 06:11 PM   #65
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by a squarecan
Man everytime I sign in I always come back to check this thread out because I am so impressed with your fab skills! Same pix each time and everytime I am still drooling over them. Being 19 and wanting to some day make a career of what your doing now do you have any advice on what a young kid should do? I know you mentioned practice and lots of it, but how in the hell did you learn about all the geometry involved? I plan to go to WyoTech next year to take chassis fab along with alomst everything else involved, but I am curious if you had any sources to learn what is involved with frame geometry?

Thanks
Keith
Study mechanical engineering & do cool stuff like this as a side gig.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 04:49 PM   #66
Portmod7
Registered User
 
Portmod7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 388
Awesome work man. I have been thinking about building a new front and rear suspension for my 68, and I have been trying to figure out what to do about bushings. For the upper and lower control arms in the front, as well as a triangulated 4-link in the back(I thought I was the only one who thought about reversing the upper links). I plan on building everything myself. I thought about just using heim ends for all the connections, but I think that would give a bit of a harsh ride. I want something that will feel really smooth going down the road. Any suggestions on bushings? I was thinking maybe some bushings for a monte carlo or something. Thanks, and again, NICE WORK.

Just out of curiosity, why did you reverse the upper links on your rear suspension? i.e. run them close together at the frame and far apart at the housing, rather than the conventional setup? I had something in mind when I thought about it, just wondering if you did it for the same reason.
Portmod7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 08:28 PM   #67
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Portmod7
Awesome work man. I have been thinking about building a new front and rear suspension for my 68, and I have been trying to figure out what to do about bushings. For the upper and lower control arms in the front, as well as a triangulated 4-link in the back(I thought I was the only one who thought about reversing the upper links). I plan on building everything myself. I thought about just using heim ends for all the connections, but I think that would give a bit of a harsh ride. I want something that will feel really smooth going down the road. Any suggestions on bushings? I was thinking maybe some bushings for a monte carlo or something. Thanks, and again, NICE WORK.

Just out of curiosity, why did you reverse the upper links on your rear suspension? i.e. run them close together at the frame and far apart at the housing, rather than the conventional setup? I had something in mind when I thought about it, just wondering if you did it for the same reason.
Look into Johnny Joints. They are better for the type of applications we are building, and they ride great. I changed the upper bars because I didn't want a lot of clutter in the middle of the frame. Doing it this way gives it a cleaner look, and it's not good to weld on the 12 bolt housing. I used poly bushings in the front and I made custom brass bushings for the cantilever setup. The 4 link will use poly bushings on one end and Johnny joints on the other.

Thanks
Jr

Last edited by valleycustom; 09-20-2005 at 08:29 PM.
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 12:17 AM   #68
Musclerodz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 2,365
Running a pair of bars diagonal in a 4 link is called a satchell link suspension. If set up right they work very well. The other thing they do is eliminate the need for a lateral locating device such as a panhard bar or watts link.

Mike
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 12:32 AM   #69
Portmod7
Registered User
 
Portmod7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musclerodz
Running a pair of bars diagonal in a 4 link is called a satchell link suspension. If set up right they work very well. The other thing they do is eliminate the need for a lateral locating device such as a panhard bar or watts link.

Mike

I knew all that already, but most stock style satchell link suspensions have the links mounted to the pumpkin on the rear end housing, and spread far apart towards the frame. I thought about doing it the other way around so that when the truck goes around a corner and the bushings in the links squish a little it will actually push the outside rear wheel back, and bring the inside rear wheel forward just a hair. It should promote a slightly "loose" handling through the center of the corner, keeping the front end from washing out so easily, in turn making cornering faster.

I race cars on the weekends, this is stuff that goes through my mind all day long every day, thought maybe it would be cool to apply it to my truck.
Portmod7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 12:40 AM   #70
Portmod7
Registered User
 
Portmod7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by valleycustom
Look into Johnny Joints. They are better for the type of applications we are building, and they ride great. I changed the upper bars because I didn't want a lot of clutter in the middle of the frame. Doing it this way gives it a cleaner look, and it's not good to weld on the 12 bolt housing. I used poly bushings in the front and I made custom brass bushings for the cantilever setup. The 4 link will use poly bushings on one end and Johnny joints on the other.

Thanks
Jr
I didn't know such a thing existed, but just this morning a friend of mine who is helping with my truck found some on the net. I didn't know what they were called. I found them to be called Ball Bearing-bushings or something like that. If you are looking for a place to buy them, Currie enterprises has them for 39.95 a piece or this site called http://www.*****************/products...ot_bar-end.htm

Theirs look to be the same thing only $5 cheaper. Looks like a really awesome piece. I am thinking about using them on my A-arms too. A little expensive but I bet they would feel awesome. Going to weld my 4-link to a floating axle 9-inch Ought to be fun.
Portmod7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 01:52 AM   #71
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Portmod7
I knew all that already, but most stock style satchell link suspensions have the links mounted to the pumpkin on the rear end housing, and spread far apart towards the frame.
The stock 67-72 does it the other way around... narrow on the forward mounts, and angled back until it intersects with the (outer ends of the) rearend. What other stock multi-link suspension does what you're describing?
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 03:11 AM   #72
DroppedZ84
Account Suspended
 
DroppedZ84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 186
Hey Valley,
Do you have your own shop or what? There's quite a few bagged trucks around Modesto, but I don't think I've seen any with quite that extensive of frame work. Very impressive. Hopefully I'll see it driving around modesto in the near future.
DroppedZ84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 10:08 AM   #73
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
Hey XXL the chevelle had a stock 4 link ran that way.

Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 12:09 PM   #74
valleycustom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by DroppedZ84
Hey Valley,
Do you have your own shop or what? There's quite a few bagged trucks around Modesto, but I don't think I've seen any with quite that extensive of frame work. Very impressive. Hopefully I'll see it driving around modesto in the near future.
I should have my shop open by next summer, but until then I'm just doing the work out of my house. Yeah I have a few trucks driving around town that I bagged. I have a pewter Sonoma on 20" kmc's. I also did a black hardbody on caddy rims and it has the rear shaved.

Later
Jr
valleycustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 01:52 PM   #75
Portmod7
Registered User
 
Portmod7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXL
The stock 67-72 does it the other way around... narrow on the forward mounts, and angled back until it intersects with the (outer ends of the) rearend. What other stock multi-link suspension does what you're describing?
Are you talking about the 67-72 trucks? That is a truck-arm suspension, I was talking about a triangulated 4-link. Every triangulated 4-link I have seen on a stock vehicle has been witht he upper links mounted close together at the housing and far apart at the frame. There may be some I am not aware of that go the other way, but I don't remeber ever seeing any before.
Portmod7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com