09-03-2014, 07:41 PM | #51 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
It's hard to beat a brand new motor that's for sure.
|
09-04-2014, 04:20 PM | #52 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Do you think they could have designed the air conditioning compressor to need any MORE brackets?
|
09-04-2014, 04:36 PM | #53 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
You could ditch it and get the serpentine setup at a salvage yard. |
|
09-04-2014, 04:43 PM | #54 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Im subscribed
__________________
Built not bought! My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless! Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion |
09-06-2014, 06:09 PM | #55 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
All the Edelbrock parts have arrived! Great deal on the intake from Jegs for $150 with the install kit. The air cleaner was free with the carburetor purchase, and it came with a free t-shirt too!
Anyone know if I can use the stock throttle and transmission cable brackets? |
09-06-2014, 06:19 PM | #56 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
A lot of parts cleaning has been done, though it seems like there is always more to do. I want it to look mostly stock, so I plan to use the original valve covers and paint the Edelbrock intake orange with the rest of the block. All the brackets and pulleys will be black like original.
Here's a few pics: |
09-06-2014, 07:03 PM | #57 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ennis, TX
Posts: 18
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Nice C20. I like the 8 luggers. Thanks for the detailed pics. Probably a good move on the crate engine. Hard to beat the crate price unless you are doing all rebuild work yourself.
__________________
62' C10 72' C30 Dually 81' C10 90' 454SS 07' Duramax |
09-07-2014, 09:57 AM | #58 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
If anyone is interested, I just put up a new photo gallery with all these photos and a bunch more - http://www.jimbosprint.com/ChevyC20 |
|
09-07-2014, 03:18 PM | #59 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,724
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Great gallery you have there .
|
09-09-2014, 04:08 PM | #60 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Getting the transmission crossmember out was a battle!
|
09-09-2014, 04:58 PM | #61 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
It doesn't matter how many rivets you remove it never gets any easier, it's easily my least favorite part of working on the frame.
|
09-09-2014, 08:40 PM | #62 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Crate is here!
|
09-09-2014, 09:02 PM | #63 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Gm 10067353
Last edited by jimbosprint; 09-09-2014 at 09:07 PM. |
09-09-2014, 09:53 PM | #64 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,724
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
That crate looks very familiar ,you wont regret it ,very good motor for the money .
|
09-09-2014, 10:31 PM | #65 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Very nice.
|
09-13-2014, 09:23 PM | #66 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
I got the intake and old valve covers installed onto the new motor today. Almost ready for the Chevrolet Orange engine paint.
|
09-15-2014, 06:36 PM | #67 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Wow! Calyx sure makes old exhaust manifolds look great!
|
09-15-2014, 07:38 PM | #68 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
At least until they get hot again ;-).
Are you running stock mannifolds, or are you gonna run headers?
__________________
Built not bought! My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless! Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion |
09-15-2014, 07:47 PM | #69 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Quote:
The Calyx is a graphite paste manifold dressing (not paint), it's not supposed to burn off and it should be easy to touch up. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it does. |
|
09-15-2014, 08:08 PM | #70 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,724
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
I used the Calyx on my wife's Malibu and my truck manifolds ,still holding up well after several years and many ,many miles .They do need a little touch up this winter .
|
09-15-2014, 08:13 PM | #71 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Is it a spray? And how well does it work on headers? Or is it for cast only?
__________________
Built not bought! My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless! Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion |
09-15-2014, 08:24 PM | #72 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
It's a paste. I used a rag and just rubbed it in like a polish. Only for cast. I think the photo above makes it look a little more shiny than it really is. I think it looks darker and more like cast metal than the photo shows too.
Eastwood.com Calyx Manifold Coating |
09-15-2014, 08:30 PM | #73 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Just finished the other one.
|
09-15-2014, 08:49 PM | #74 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 951
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Excellent! That is exactly what I was hoping to hear.
|
09-15-2014, 09:29 PM | #75 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,724
|
Re: jimbosprint 1972 C20 - the good, the bad, and the ugly
Once installed and heated unless you want to heat them in your oven they should retain their color for a long time .
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
1972, c20, deluxe, stock |
|
|