The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2017, 03:06 PM   #76
James the III
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: lowell ma
Posts: 750
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K View Post
So there are states where they would rather you tailgate than slow down? I can't imagine a courtroom in this nation where a person charged with driving under minimum speed wouldn't be let off once they explained they were driving that slow to maintain a safe distance from the vehicle ahead. Our minimum speed on interstates in 40 mph, and I believe that's national. Every rush hour there are areas on 55-70 mph interstates where no one is doing 40
I can see being in court and telling the judge, WELL your honor, I was going that slow as my vehicle can't stop fast enough to keep up with todays traffic..

Instant defective equipment ticket.. if not driving to endanger.. that here is an instant lost of lic. for 6 months..

God bless those in areas that don't have traffic.. you are blessed.
James the III is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 07:58 PM   #77
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,862
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

Are you considering moving? I would or give up driving. Your court scenario is comical and far fetched. What I was saying is you tell the judge you were going under the minimum because it was the only way to not tailgate the people who keep jumping in creating a distance insufficient to operate in a safe manor. And, wouldn't you be going the same speed as everyone else, only with the proper distance? The safe distance when I took drivers ed in drum brake cars was 1 car length per 10 miles an hour. Have they reduced that now that cars have disc brakes? I think not, and that distance was established when cars had drum brakes. I never had any issues with following that rule back then or now...in either drum or disc brake vehicles. Judges don't want to hear monkey see/monkey do. Just because everyone else drives like an ass is no excuse for you to, I don't care what state you are in.

We just get a repair order for any safety equipment violations, and 30 days to fix. And factory brakes in proper working order is not on that list
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~

Last edited by special-K; 02-18-2017 at 10:30 PM.
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 08:18 PM   #78
saxart
Registered User
 
saxart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: St. Croix River Valley, WI
Posts: 795
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

I'm confused...

As I mentioned earlier, if I tromp on my 1970's power-drum brakes, all 4 wheels will lock up HARD! How is this truck going to stop any slower than a similar truck equipped with disk brakes? I get it that it won't be as good if I was towing or driving in hilly terrain which made the brakes heat up, but I'm just not buying all this talk of increasing following distance because I'm driving a drum brake vehicle.

What am I missing here?
__________________
Meet "Old Roy": http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=707801
saxart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:00 PM   #79
palallin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. James, MO
Posts: 1,239
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

I have driven one of these trucks daily since 1983. I have driven in the densest city traffic, the fastest interstates, and and old country roads. Both the '67 and the '69 have drums. They ARE my DDs. And I have never yet rear-ended anyone or anything. If I ever did rear-end anyone, I hope I'd be man enough to go into the courtroom and say, "Hey, Judge: I screwed up," rather than trying to blame my failure on the perfectly good equipment.

But it is all too common these days that no one owns up to mistakes, blaming it on others, their equipment, the manufacturers, Congress for not outlawing dangerous whateveritmightbe. . .

There are no dangerous objects, just dangerous people.
__________________
'69 Longstep K-10: 327/SM465/T-221/Closed Knuckle Dana44/12-bolt.
palallin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:15 PM   #80
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,861
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

Ah HA! The old disk vs. drum discussion.

I have vac. assisted drums and they stop me quite well and I use my truck for hauling loads of decomposed granite, gravel, pallets of sod, dirt, cut-up trees with my 4' sides up, etc.

Disks will not reduce stopping distance IMO unless there have been repeated heavy applications generating lots of heat and fade. Then I suppose it would be better to have disc.

I've never had a fade problem and with a close ratio 4spd and well maintained brakes, I don't expect I ever will. If I did this work in the nearby mountains I would consider disks.

All this talk about following distance makes me wonder because I have been in this business for 30 years and I've never had a problem leaving the cushion. When I'm heavy I stick to the right. Nobody bothers you there because who wants to cut into the slow lane behind a bunch of trucks????

When I'm light I move into a faster lane but I've never had a problem there either. In my car which has Anti-Lock disks all around I still have no problem leaving distance, never have and would never follow too closely.

It's easy to forget that following too close will not get you to your destination much sooner. If you are in a real hurry, or if you are young and have an urgent need for speed, it may SEEM difficult to allow a safe cushion, but it is possible and absolutely necessary regardless of your brake design. -BA
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme. Best $300 I ever spent.

Last edited by WorkinLonghorn; 02-18-2017 at 09:24 PM.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:21 PM   #81
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,861
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saxart View Post
I'm confused...

As I mentioned earlier, if I tromp on my 1970's power-drum brakes, all 4 wheels will lock up HARD! How is this truck going to stop any slower than a similar truck equipped with disk brakes? I get it that it won't be as good if I was towing or driving in hilly terrain which made the brakes heat up, but I'm just not buying all this talk of increasing following distance because I'm driving a drum brake vehicle.

What am I missing here?
^^^ Exactly. TY
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme. Best $300 I ever spent.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 12:26 AM   #82
CST10
Registered User
 
CST10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 1,441
Re: How many have restored trucks and left their front drum brakes?

I have manual front drums in the 68 and power drum front brakes on the 70. No problems at all. Stops just fine.
__________________
MyToys:
Goldilocks the "Ol School Survivor" 1968 C10, SWB Stepside, 08/15 TOTM, 250 CI 6 cylinder, 3 on the tree, 3.73 rear, 3/5 static drop, 23,500 original miles.
Samson the 1970 CST10, LWB, 462Ci, Turbo 350 tranny, 3.08 rear gear, PB, PS, A/C, AM/FM, 2/4 Drop.
Brutus the 1998 Camaro Z28, 33,500 original miles, LS1, 519 RWHP/497 RWTQ.
Member of the Louisiana Classic Truck Club, LCTC
Member of the Louisiana C10 Club
Member of the Baton Rouge Drifters Car Club
CST10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com