How about some pics of 67-72 Part II - Page 51 - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

HiredGun · 01-14-2013, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mud.man.rj

Looks good, killer single plane intake?

I'm new to the classic world lol! The only thing i know about my intake is that its and Eidelbrock. Here's a pic from when I got it. It's cleaner now lol

SCHRUMGMC · 01-14-2013, 02:57 AM

whats that?

fatboy43 · 01-14-2013, 12:22 PM

mines not shiney enough to look good or patinaed enough to be cool but here it is. Name: 1325285568641.jpg
Views: 3785
Size: 25.2 KB

Name: 1325285614754.jpg
Views: 3783
Size: 18.8 KB

sanford&daughter · 01-14-2013, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCHRUMGMC

whats that?

That's hiredguns intake manifold. He's showing off that edelbrock victor series on that sweet big block I love big block trucks

SCHRUMGMC · 01-14-2013, 02:28 PM

is a V8 350 Big block ? Haha

sanford&daughter · 01-14-2013, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCHRUMGMC

is a V8 350 Big block ? Haha

Its a v8 could be 396,402,427 or 454

SCHRUMGMC · 01-14-2013, 02:47 PM

Alright not sure though....How much MPG does a V8 350

guzzo82chevy · 01-14-2013, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCHRUMGMC

Alright not sure though....How much MPG does a V8 350

My 82s got a 350 Small Block! and i get about a whopping 15 MPG Highway and about 9 aroundt town!!! keep in mind i have A LOT of hills here where i live!

fatboy43 · 01-14-2013, 04:27 PM

mine has a 305 with a sum 1103 cam 601 casting heads with 1.92/1.50 valves, headers, rpm intake, 4bbl holley now ditched the edel. the motor was free the head work was 100 the cam was 100 and all the other came off the 350 i blew. i cant really tell a loss in power. it actually is stronger than the 350. and the best bonus is that it gets about 22-26mpgs! most builders hate the 305 and ill drive one all day long.

SCHRUMGMC · 01-14-2013, 05:36 PM

Lord, have mercy thats low Lol

shawno72 · 01-14-2013, 05:47 PM

Here is a few of mine

Name: tires 1.jpg
Views: 3739
Size: 42.2 KB

Name: tires 2.jpg
Views: 3727
Size: 35.7 KB

Name: photo 5.jpg
Views: 3744
Size: 52.4 KB

SCHRUMGMC · 01-14-2013, 05:50 PM

Two more photos similiar to my old one

Roger71SWB · 01-15-2013, 01:42 PM

I get 10mpg around town. 350 with enduroshine.

HiredGun · 01-15-2013, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sanford&daughter

Its a v8 could be 396,402,427 or 454

I have the big block. But mine is a commercial block from what I've read. We got it in a deal where both us and the owner didnt know exactly WHICH block it was, just knew it was a big block. After we bought it we ran the numbers and found out it is a 366ci. Mostly found in school buses and dump trucks. It's hard finding info on them, but from what I've found out they are all low end TQ and have the same stroke of a 427 just a different bore.

shawno72 · 01-15-2013, 02:10 PM

Some more

Name: RANDOM 1.jpg
Views: 3629
Size: 40.5 KB

Name: RANDOM 2.jpg
Views: 3623
Size: 42.5 KB

Name: RANDOM 3.jpg
Views: 3621
Size: 44.3 KB

Name: RANDOM 4.jpg
Views: 3629
Size: 39.2 KB

Name: RANDOM 5.jpg
Views: 3626
Size: 42.9 KB

SCHRUMGMC · 01-15-2013, 02:10 PM

VIN Format: 1968-1971 GMC truck

Decoding: CE134B117643

Digit Usage VIN Decoded
1 Chassis C 2WD
2 Engine E V8
3 GVW 1 1/2 ton 3600-5600#
4-5 Body 34 Fleetside
6 Plant B Baltimore MD
7 Year 1 1971
8-12 Sequential Serial # 17643 17643

FrankenCub · 01-15-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HiredGun

I have the big block. But mine is a commercial block from what I've read. We got it in a deal where both us and the owner didnt know exactly WHICH block it was, just knew it was a big block. After we bought it we ran the numbers and found out it is a 366ci. Mostly found in school buses and dump trucks. It's hard finding info on them, but from what I've found out they are all low end TQ and have the same stroke of a 427 just a different bore.

We see a lot of those 'truck' blocks around here from old school buses. I bet they'd be great for a 4x4. Your best bet would be to replace that Victor intake with something more sutible, they are better for higher RPM horsepower and not so good for low RPM torque. I would think your 366 is suffering some with that Victor, it has so much more potential.

tobytuttle · 01-15-2013, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roger71SWB

I get 10mpg around town. 350 with enduroshine.

nice looking truck and super sharp engine compartment!!!!

magwakeenercew2jh · 01-15-2013, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shawno72

Some more

Lookin' good Shawn. I went to visit a "new" exhaust man today. When I get the dough, I'm going to have the exhaust that the local guy (who was SUPPOSED TO BE great) butchered a couple of months ago. This time, re-done by someone who does it correctly.

I may move the pipes outward a taste. The close pipes are how I got it back from the local yahoo. The other is photoshopped outward. This time, I'll probably put 'em (with different tips) somewhere a little inward and an inch or so shorter from where they sit on the photoshopped pic.

shawno72 · 01-15-2013, 07:18 PM

Thank you Bill, if you look in my build thread you can see how I routed my exhaust.

falconizer_62 · 01-15-2013, 07:58 PM

11.4:1 383 stroker with 700R4 and 3.55 diff yields 18-21 mpg, the old 350 got 12mpg with the same trans and 4.11 gears

guzzo82chevy · 01-15-2013, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magwakeenercew2jh

Lookin' good Shawn. I went to visit a "new" exhaust man today. When I get the dough, I'm going to have the exhaust that the local guy (who was SUPPOSED TO BE great) butchered a couple of months ago. This time, re-done by someone who does it correctly.

I may move the pipes outward a taste. The close pipes are how I got it back from the local yahoo. The other is photoshopped outward. This time, I'll probably put 'em (with different tips) somewhere a little inward and an inch or so shorter from where they sit on the photoshopped pic.

I prefer the photoshopped pic! That's just more my style! Truck nice, real nice!
Posted via Mobile Device

mud.man.rj · 01-15-2013, 09:38 PM

The pipes do look a lot better further apart don't they.

SCHRUMGMC · 01-15-2013, 09:44 PM

Those pipes are pretty sick

69GWC · 01-15-2013, 09:55 PM

I like them closer myself,, but with larger tips.

Posted via Mobile Device

01-14-2013, 02:57 AM	#1252
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II whats that? __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100

01-14-2013, 12:22 PM	#1253
fatboy43 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: fort cobb ,ok Posts: 63	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II mines not shiney enough to look good or patinaed enough to be cool but here it is.

01-14-2013, 02:28 PM	#1255
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II is a V8 350 Big block ? Haha __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100

01-14-2013, 02:47 PM	#1257
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Alright not sure though....How much MPG does a V8 350 __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100

01-14-2013, 04:27 PM	#1259
fatboy43 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: fort cobb ,ok Posts: 63	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II mine has a 305 with a sum 1103 cam 601 casting heads with 1.92/1.50 valves, headers, rpm intake, 4bbl holley now ditched the edel. the motor was free the head work was 100 the cam was 100 and all the other came off the 350 i blew. i cant really tell a loss in power. it actually is stronger than the 350. and the best bonus is that it gets about 22-26mpgs! most builders hate the 305 and ill drive one all day long.

01-14-2013, 05:36 PM	#1260
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Lord, have mercy thats low Lol __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100

01-14-2013, 05:47 PM	#1261
shawno72 C/10 junkie Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Stockton Ca Posts: 9,093	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Here is a few of mine __________________ Shawn 70 LWB C10 current driver/project http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=663051 68 SWB C10 Work in progress.....SOLD http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559520 72 LWB C10 Sold 71 LWB C10 Sold 68 LWB C10 CST Sold http://youtu.be/kbB0QrBIs9k My mom always had the best advice. It was just a tad late. After a fall that involved blood, she'd say....."Careful!"

01-14-2013, 05:50 PM	#1262
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Two more photos similiar to my old one Attached Images __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100

01-15-2013, 01:42 PM	#1263
Roger71SWB Registered User Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: vancouver washington Posts: 89	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II I get 10mpg around town. 350 with enduroshine. Attached Images

01-15-2013, 02:10 PM	#1265
shawno72 C/10 junkie Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Stockton Ca Posts: 9,093	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Some more __________________ Shawn 70 LWB C10 current driver/project http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=663051 68 SWB C10 Work in progress.....SOLD http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559520 72 LWB C10 Sold 71 LWB C10 Sold 68 LWB C10 CST Sold http://youtu.be/kbB0QrBIs9k My mom always had the best advice. It was just a tad late. After a fall that involved blood, she'd say....."Careful!"

01-15-2013, 02:10 PM	#1266
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II VIN Format: 1968-1971 GMC truck Decoding: CE134B117643 Digit Usage VIN Decoded 1 Chassis C 2WD 2 Engine E V8 3 GVW 1 1/2 ton 3600-5600# 4-5 Body 34 Fleetside 6 Plant B Baltimore MD 7 Year 1 1971 8-12 Sequential Serial # 17643 17643 __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100

01-15-2013, 07:18 PM	#1270
shawno72 C/10 junkie Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Stockton Ca Posts: 9,093	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Thank you Bill, if you look in my build thread you can see how I routed my exhaust. __________________ Shawn 70 LWB C10 current driver/project http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=663051 68 SWB C10 Work in progress.....SOLD http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559520 72 LWB C10 Sold 71 LWB C10 Sold 68 LWB C10 CST Sold http://youtu.be/kbB0QrBIs9k My mom always had the best advice. It was just a tad late. After a fall that involved blood, she'd say....."Careful!"

01-15-2013, 07:58 PM	#1271
falconizer_62 Registered User Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: garden grove, ca Posts: 24	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II 11.4:1 383 stroker with 700R4 and 3.55 diff yields 18-21 mpg, the old 350 got 12mpg with the same trans and 4.11 gears

01-15-2013, 09:38 PM	#1273
mud.man.rj Registered User Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Creighton Sask. Canada Posts: 4,121	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II The pipes do look a lot better further apart don't they.

01-15-2013, 09:44 PM	#1274
SCHRUMGMC Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: North Carolina Posts: 4,989	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II Those pipes are pretty sick __________________ 1971 GMC Sierra 1959 GMC 100



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

01-15-2013, 09:55 PM	#1275
69GWC Registered User Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,089	Re: How about some pics of 67-72 Part II I like them closer myself,, but with larger tips. Posted via Mobile Device

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.