01-08-2012, 11:34 AM | #151 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
|
04-01-2012, 05:41 PM | #152 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
finally back at it heres some more progress had some clearence issues with dropmember and back spacing in front not much room for turning if you want to ride real low mocked the front clip hood is just sitting on there for pics
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build Last edited by c.brown; 04-01-2012 at 05:47 PM. |
04-01-2012, 09:29 PM | #153 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 1,209
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Wow , you are making progress!!! looking good , think you will have it mobile by Power Tour time???
|
04-01-2012, 09:50 PM | #154 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Scotts, Michigan
Posts: 3,773
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Looks great. You can't beat this MI weather to get a jump on truck projects.
Keep it up. Marc
__________________
…………...........__________ .................. ((__|__||___\____ ..;.;;.:;:;.,;..;((_(O))____ (_(O)) 1948 Chevy Truck - Finished SOLD!! 1953 Chevy Suburban "Family Truckster" Completed: Spring of 2021 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=605484 1994 4x4 Blazer - "Field Find" https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...ferrerid=30857 |
04-02-2012, 07:07 AM | #155 |
65 suburban vortec 5.3 bagged
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: upstate new york
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
the suburban looks great!!!! i am having the same type of backspacing problems with my front i also have the dropmember it looks like i will have alot of work to move the wheels in to get some steering to be able to drive!!!! it only looks like you have an inch or so for steering!
|
04-02-2012, 08:40 AM | #156 |
Registered Loser
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Killer
__________________
((..)) ((0)) '63 GMC lwb, 383, th350, lays frame, genuine patina. The Build Thread - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=374267 '88 Astro cargo bagged, shaved, phantom grille. *SOLD* '50 Chevy 2 door sedan awaiting attention. 2014 Silverado Ext cab, 5.3, daily driver. |
04-02-2012, 09:04 AM | #157 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Independence,KS
Posts: 1,477
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Great build!
|
04-02-2012, 10:36 AM | #158 |
65 suburban vortec 5.3 bagged
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: upstate new york
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Is the picture of the wheel and the gap between the fender aired up or all the way aired out?
Posted via Mobile Device |
04-02-2012, 09:52 PM | #159 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
||
04-02-2012, 09:53 PM | #160 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
|
04-03-2012, 09:02 AM | #161 |
65 suburban vortec 5.3 bagged
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: upstate new york
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
i found this thread on the dropmember that might answer some questions. i didnt notice a 1.5 inch narrower track and i cant drive low without the wheels hitting the lip of the fender and i trimmed the fender back a bunch i am still trying to figure this out myself.
I figured I would go ahead and include some more technical information in regards to the suspension/steering geometry of the Porterbuilt Dropmember and some background as to "why". When I first designed the Dropmember back in 2004-2005 I spent a lot of time tweaking the geometry in order to make it accomplish exactly what I wanted. This system was never designed to be an "ultimate performance" suspension system... but I wanted to develop a system that was an improvement from the factory design, could be driven at an extremely low height, and plant the rails on the ground with a big wheel... without the need to "Z" the frame. First on the list was the necessary ground clearance. The Dropmember moves the suspension up in the chassis so that the lowest part of the front suspension is actually 1.25" off the ground when the frame is resting flat (the lowest point is the lower control arm outer bushing sleeve). This allows the truck to be driven extremely low without hangin up on all the imperfections on the road. Second was to narrow up the trac-width. The Dropmember narrows the track width right at 1.5" per side (from stock) allowing more tire clearance while riding and turning when extremely low. Third, we wanted to move the wheel center-line forward to center the wheels in the wheel wells... mission accomplished. You can run a 22" wheel and not even worry about cutting into the firewall for tire clearance. And while striving to accomplish these key points we also wanted to make some "improvements" to the C10 geometry.... as in it's factory design there is a lot to be desired. As many have been learning, thanks to Rob from No Limit and his "make it handle" thread, one of the key points to making these trucks handle better is to add caster. The Dropmember has 6.97 degrees of caster in its design. Another key point we implememted was to design the camber curve to where it didn't gain a lot of camber through compression. We didn't want the truck to have extreme camber when aired out and have that "broken" look. Some might argue that camber gain is essential to a performance suspension... and it is... but that was not the overall goal of the Dropmember. The Dropmember only gains 1 degree of negative camber through 6 inches of compression. Doesn't make it stick in the corners like a porsche, but looks good at the show. We also wanted to adapt a rack and pinion steering gear to the design, not just because we had to in order to get the trac-width narrowed, but it also decreased the sprung weight considerably. We mounted the rack high on the crossmember in order to accomplish all we wanted (with it being a factory replacement rack we didn't have the liberty to put it anywhere else). The downfall to this was the necessity to notch the frame for the rack's tie-rod clearance. Not too big of a deal for most guys looking for this type of product, as they would expect a little cutting and welding. The big upside is the angle for the steering linkage. On most motors and header combos its a straight shot. It was important to keep the bumpsteer in check as well, and we were able to hold to the standard of .1 degree of bumpsteer per inch of wheel travel. If anybody has any more technical questions they can feel free to ask, as I will be more than happy to answer any questions. On a side note... keep your eyes peeled for our performance version of the Dropmember as it is just around the corner. __________________ www.PORTERBUILTSTREETRODS.com Phone or Text: 480-297-2621 E-mail: porterbuiltdirect@gmail.com Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck. |
04-03-2012, 09:41 AM | #162 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
The Dropmember does narrow the trac width right at 1.5 inches per side. We also offer narrowed control arms for a bit more room, and CPP makes a spindle that will also bring it in a little more. These are a couple more options to bring it in some more.
Nate Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com Phone: 480-297-2621 E-mail: sales@pbfab.com Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck. We offer components from the following manufacturers: Porterbuilt Accuair Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies) Air Lift Wilwood Intro Unisteer ECE Gotta Show Air Lift Borgeson CPP Supporting this forum since 2003! |
04-03-2012, 11:08 AM | #163 | |
65 suburban vortec 5.3 bagged
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: upstate new york
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
CBrown sorry to hijack your thread!!!!! Posted via Mobile Device |
|
04-03-2012, 11:40 AM | #164 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
We ran the same configuration on Dino's panel truck and on his 66 (short bed that later turned crew cab), and at 3" off the ground (measured from the bottom of the frame to the ground) it would handle all driving conditions with an occasional "kiss" from the tire touching the fender lip when I would pull into a drive way. Lane changes and merging was never an issue 1/2" off the ground, but full lock to lock turns an inch off the ground were not gonna happen unless we narrowed it up more (and at the time there wasn't a modular spindle, and we didn't make arms either.... but it was never something that seemed to be a big deal). Here's some pics of how we trimmed the fender on Dino's truck (post #19): http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=211503
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com Phone: 480-297-2621 E-mail: sales@pbfab.com Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck. We offer components from the following manufacturers: Porterbuilt Accuair Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies) Air Lift Wilwood Intro Unisteer ECE Gotta Show Air Lift Borgeson CPP Supporting this forum since 2003! |
|
04-04-2012, 07:59 PM | #165 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Martucky Il.
Posts: 54
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
C.Brown, You going to have this running for the Hot Rod Power Tour kick Off in Detroit this year?
|
04-04-2012, 08:41 PM | #166 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Martucky Il.
Posts: 54
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
C.Brown, Here's some pictures of the fender cutting I had to do on mine. Ride height is 5 inches, Unless I'm Showin Off. Then I won't turn to sharp. I have chewed up the fenders a bit. If it ever gets the paint done I'll try and be more careful.
Last edited by realnice1s; 04-04-2012 at 08:45 PM. Reason: pictures |
04-04-2012, 08:47 PM | #167 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Martucky Il.
Posts: 54
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Sorry. It won't let me load pictures. I'll try again later if you really need to see them.
|
04-05-2012, 05:20 PM | #168 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
||
04-05-2012, 05:23 PM | #169 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
GOSTRANGER talked with nate cpp makes a modular spindal that brings the wheel in almost an inch let you know if i figure out more
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
04-05-2012, 07:28 PM | #170 |
chevy only
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,619
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Mr C sorry i wasnt able to talk much today when you called. I did talk to Dave and it looks like the same amount of clearance I have had on my trucks but I run a much smaller tire. I am getting ready to freshin' up my panel and I will post some good pics. I do drive my stuff really low and nate is right... they're not made to go lock to lock. I had some issues on my orange sub and it was tough to drive layed out but I ran a 22x10 up front. Try that module spindle from cpp and a smaller tire. I know it sucks to have to buy parts twice and that the roads are rougher out where you guys are so you run a bigger profile. Try calling me later on after 5:00 pm and we can talk more.
__________________
CHEVY ONLY... Nothin Else ! |
04-05-2012, 07:30 PM | #171 |
chevy only
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,619
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
opps and your truck looks killer !!
__________________
CHEVY ONLY... Nothin Else ! |
04-05-2012, 08:54 PM | #172 | |
65 suburban vortec 5.3 bagged
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: upstate new york
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
04-05-2012, 09:42 PM | #173 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
|
04-05-2012, 09:47 PM | #174 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
Quote:
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
|
04-09-2012, 08:26 PM | #175 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: harrison twp MI
Posts: 292
|
Re: 1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L
few steps backwards to move foward pulled motor trans and front clip back off but was able to get dropmember reinforcements painted and installed
__________________
1966 suburban slammed fuel injected 6.2L My build |
Bookmarks |
|
|