The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2013, 09:15 PM   #1
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
skinny wheels fat stance

Kinda like the title says guys. Going to be starting on the front suspension hopefully here in a few months or so. Going to lower the truck (not sure how low), disc brakes, and the whole sh-bang. I'm going to be running a skinny rim, most likely a 15x6 or 15x7. I have 15x7's on the front now, but I absolutely hate the look of the wheels being tucked in so far. I will not be running any wheel size bigger than what I listed. So on to the questions. Pics are always welcome too.

1. How can I get the wheel out closer to the edge of the fender without using spacers?

2. Do I have to get longer upper/lower A arms to push the wheel further away from the frame? If so what companies sell them?

Next question is also something else I want, but not sure if it's possible.

3. How can I get that negative camber without using bags? I don't want a ton of camber, just a little bit. Enough to be noticed.

All I'm looking to do is give the truck a fatter stance in the front with the things I like without getting a fatter tire. Thanks in advance.
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 10:48 PM   #2
Drewski23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 142
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

i dont think you can make it stick out more without spacers or without a wider wheel...

and all the spindles i have seen either retain factory width or bring it in a little bit to accommodate larger wheels

i would think longer control arms would be the only option there and if so id think its gonna have to be a custom job
Drewski23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 10:54 PM   #3
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Why is the issue with spacers? I have put hundreds of thousands of miles on good, billet spacers like these:




http://www.ebay.com/itm/2pc-TOYOTA-F...9bdfa7&vxp=mtr
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:08 PM   #4
DreamRyder1963
Senior Member
 
DreamRyder1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 499
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

You could also get wheels with less backspace which will cause it to stick out farther.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
1971 Chevy C10 Cheyenne (sold for Mazda)
1963 Chevy Corvair Pro-Touring Project
2012 Mazda 3 i Sport sedan
http://www.dracoautodesigns.com/
DreamRyder1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:28 PM   #5
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

I honestly don't have a problem with spacers, I just don't know how big of a spacer I will need to have.

I've seen it done with having the wheels pushed out further, and I also have pics, but I just don't know how they did it. I'm thinking I'll have to have custom parts made, but what do you guys think that will cost me?
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:38 PM   #6
Robznob11
Registered User
 
Robznob11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: brownfield texas (west texas)
Posts: 1,936
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Im not 100% positive but im pretty sure the 73 up front stance is wider than the 67-72 and is a bolt in.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
The Ghost 67 short wide full custom. 550 hp LSX, 4l80E, narrowed 9". Body dropped w/air ride!
........................ ___
.........________//__{\_____
,,,,,,,/__(⊙)___//___/__(O)_/

@disciple2.rc 💪instagram💪
LED TAILS
Robznob11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:41 PM   #7
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Custom A-arms will cost big money, and then you'll need custom tie rods. It would be WAY cheaper to buy a set of $65 spacers, and even if you do get the wrong ones, it will still be way cheaper to order another set of them. With a 7" wheel, I'd think a 2" spacer would set it out a lot. I put a 1.5" spacer on the front of the truck below to achieve the same look, and it sat the wheels out so much that the hubcap looked like a dually to me. Without a factory cap sticking out further than the edge of the wheel, it would have probably looked great.

I'm sorry I don't pics. I had some, but I lost them in a house fire in 2010.



__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:51 PM   #8
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robznob11 View Post
Im not 100% positive but im pretty sure the 73 up front stance is wider than the 67-72 and is a bolt in.
Posted via Mobile Device
Can anyone verify this? Also does a 73 and up front end have disc brakes already? Can't remember if they do or don't. Pretty sure they do though.

67-c-30 - Sorry to hear about the fire. I like your look a little. I'm looking to bring that wheel out further about another inch or so from where your tire is at in the pics. That way the tire is I'd say about half an inch away from the lip on the fender.
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2013, 11:58 PM   #9
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by low&slow View Post
Can anyone verify this? Also does a 73 and up front end have disc brakes already? Can't remember if they do or don't. Pretty sure they do though.

67-c-30 - Sorry to hear about the fire. I like your look a little. I'm looking to bring that wheel out further about another inch or so from where your tire is at in the pics. That way the tire is I'd say about half an inch away from the lip on the fender.
Yes, the '73 set-up is a disc brake set-up. IIRC, they are about 3/4" further out than drum brakes. I don't know if they set out further than factory '71 - '72 disc brake set ups.

The rim is a factory 15 X 6 without the spacer in those pics. The 1.5" spacer set it out about an inch from flush with wheel wells.

Like I said, I wish I had those pics to show you.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 12:10 AM   #10
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

That makes sense now. I guess spacers is my only option for now.

Is 73 and up the only years with disc brakes? Does 72 have disc brakes? More info on all that would help me.

Also, does anyone know how I can get negative camber without using bags?
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 12:15 AM   #11
franken
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,069
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Negative camber?
You want to have poor tire wear?
Sorry, I guess I'm not current on style
Is this like drifting where you race to go slower than the other guy while using more tire? NASCAR guys take note
franken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 12:26 AM   #12
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by low&slow View Post
That makes sense now. I guess spacers is my only option for now.

Is 73 and up the only years with disc brakes? Does 72 have disc brakes? More info on all that would help me.

Also, does anyone know how I can get negative camber without using bags?
Disc brakes became standard on all trucks after '71. '71 and '72 disc brakes are practically the same as '73 - '87 set-ups. The spindles, tie rods, ball joints, etc all interchangeable after '71.

On the negative chamber, I kinda agree with franken on this one. Negative camber is a by product of a slammed truck when they are aired out. They don't normally go down the road like that. You are not going to be able to keep tires on your truck if your wheels are permanently set that way...
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 01:17 AM   #13
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by franken View Post
Negative camber?
You want to have poor tire wear?
Sorry, I guess I'm not current on style
Is this like drifting where you race to go slower than the other guy while using more tire? NASCAR guys take note
Yes negative camber. I'm not too worried about tire wear. This truck is being built as a drag truck and occasional show truck only (NOT a trailer queen). The camber is more for show than anything else, just to give the truck more of a lower look to it without the truck actually being that low (slammed). I don't want a lot of camber, just enough to notice.

67_C-30 - Thanks for the info on the years and the interchangeable parts.
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 10:16 AM   #14
slow-1
Registered User
 
slow-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Central NC
Posts: 830
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by low&slow View Post
Yes negative camber. I'm not too worried about tire wear. This truck is being built as a drag truck and occasional show truck only (NOT a trailer queen). The camber is more for show than anything else, just to give the truck more of a lower look to it without the truck actually being that low (slammed). I don't want a lot of camber, just enough to notice.

67_C-30 - Thanks for the info on the years and the interchangeable parts.
I am an old guy and if you ask my kids, I have no idea what is cool, but to me, when I see a lowered truck with wrong camber, it just looks like it was done wrong and needs fixing.

The Patina thing snuck up on me too...maybe its the next cool thing?
__________________
1972 Cheyene C-10 "Ole Green"
My Grandfathers truck (early 70's to 1983)
My first vehicle (1983)
Original 350 (3 rebuilds)
700R4 from Bowtie Overdrives

slow-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 10:41 AM   #15
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by slow-1 View Post
I am an old guy and if you ask my kids, I have no idea what is cool, but to me, when I see a lowered truck with wrong camber, it just looks like it was done wrong and needs fixing.

The Patina thing snuck up on me too...maybe its the next cool thing?
That patina thing is never going to catch on! -lol
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 05:15 PM   #16
no_rice
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: nevada iowa
Posts: 285
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

You do realize if you do actually intend to drag race the truck like you mentioned on occasion, or even drive it very much, that it will be twitchy as hell at speed. Even with a few degrees (enough to notice as you mentioned) of camber... it will dart all over the place.
Posted via Mobile Device
no_rice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 08:46 PM   #17
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by no_rice View Post
You do realize if you do actually intend to drag race the truck like you mentioned on occasion, or even drive it very much, that it will be twitchy as hell at speed. Even with a few degrees (enough to notice as you mentioned) of camber... it will dart all over the place.
Posted via Mobile Device
How is that so? I've been in vehicles at high speeds that have a lot more negative camber than I want, and those vehicles never had steering problems. Not arguing, just wondering.

Everyone, thanks for the comments. It's still just an idea for the camber. I'd just like to know as much as I can about the pros and cons of having a slight negative camber.
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2013, 09:07 PM   #18
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Yank the shim packs out of the upper control arm mounts and you'll have plenty of negative camber.

You won't find a good answer for your wheel spacer needs on the Internet. Bolt the wheels on and measure it to see how much further you want it to stick out. Then order the spacers YOU decided are right.
Posted via Mobile Device
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013, 04:59 PM   #19
low&slow
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tx Firefighter View Post
Yank the shim packs out of the upper control arm mounts and you'll have plenty of negative camber.

You won't find a good answer for your wheel spacer needs on the Internet. Bolt the wheels on and measure it to see how much further you want it to stick out. Then order the spacers YOU decided are right.
Posted via Mobile Device
Hey thanks for answering my original question. You say if I take out the shim packs, it will give me plenty of camber. How much camber is that actually (estimates okay) going to give me?

Also, with taking the shim packs out, is there a way I can adjust the size of them so I can play around with how much camber I may want?
low&slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013, 05:51 PM   #20
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

The more shims you take out, the more negative camber you'll get. You can get several degrees I'm sure. Problem is, unless you pull equal thickness of shims out of the front and rear locations, you're also gonna be messing with your caster too.

Combine a drop coil spring, which will cause negative camber anyway, along with pulling shims and you'll get lowered VW bug type of camber. Perhaps you can install the drop springs and find a friendly alignment guy who will set it up for you. I'd expect to have to sign a disclaimer though, because he's gonna be turning out an alignment that is outside of normal limits and he's not going to want to see you come back complaining of tire wear.

I don't really "get" the desire for negative camber but I know some guys like it. You said you wanted it to make your stuff look lowered. Thing is, you can slam one 5 or 6 inches in the front and still adjust proper camber for maximum tire wear. You wouldn't need any camber to make your stuff look lowered, there would be no doubt to anyone seeing the truck that it was hammered down.
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013, 05:55 PM   #21
JointTech
Registered User
 
JointTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,856
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

then you can put on tires 4 sizes to small and run with all the cool kids
__________________
72 C20 Long Bed
SB350 TH400 14 bolt rear end
Extremely boring build thread
JointTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013, 05:59 PM   #22
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

Wanted to add, I wasn't trying to sound like a wise guy when I said to measure for your wheel spacers yourself. Don't spend your money on something someone on the other end of the Internet tells you to if you can possibly make the choice yourself.

Lower your truck, adjust your camber as you desire, install you wheels and tires. Now, get under the truck and look and measure the distance from your tire sidewall to the inside of the fender. Then decide how much you want to move it out and order spacers for that. But don't get too greedy, you want sufficient clearance between tires and sheetmetal throughout the full suspension cycle. If I can't slip my hand between tire and sheetmetal, its too close in my opinion.
Posted via Mobile Device
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013, 06:01 PM   #23
JointTech
Registered User
 
JointTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,856
Re: skinny wheels fat stance

there are tireshops that wont work on cars with spacers. just fyi. Safety or liability issue I guess.
__________________
72 C20 Long Bed
SB350 TH400 14 bolt rear end
Extremely boring build thread
JointTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com