ok now this is ugly (imo) - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

CG · 02-17-2004, 10:15 PM

why?

jcueckert13 · 02-17-2004, 10:22 PM

because a bunch of people want the look of the older trucks without having to give up the luxurys that come with a new truck. i agree they are ugly but to each his own

*67Fleetsidedream* · 02-17-2004, 10:28 PM

Far from ugly. It is FUGLY.

superfly68 · 02-17-2004, 10:28 PM

it just doesn't fit! a rounded front end with a boxy cab.

69 air cab · 02-17-2004, 10:36 PM

pissing your money away

724x4a/cchevy · 02-17-2004, 10:44 PM

it just doesn't look good. Back then everyging was smooth and rounded. Those newer trucks are so boxy, kinda "shoebox chevy" looking.

Longhorn Man · 02-18-2004, 12:14 AM

Looks just as bad as slapping the new bed on an old truck...just don't work.

jamis · 02-18-2004, 12:21 AM

I dont like those kits at all. The only one I like is this one...on an
s-10 frame.

stepside71 · 02-18-2004, 12:23 AM

Oldakool rules and yes that is fugly.Longhorn Man you can say that again!Here's a question to ponder, why is it that pics of those trucks get layouts in magazines?

1/2_man_1/2_amazing · 02-18-2004, 12:26 AM

The pic jamis posted I liked, but the other one. No thanks, not for me anyways, somthin just don't work with it.

Cody

03glide · 02-18-2004, 12:28 AM

"why is it that pics of those trucks get layouts in magazines?"
Paid advertisement. The "fugly" comment fits perfect.

Blue Beard · 02-18-2004, 12:58 AM

Jamis, where did you find that one........?

barn9 · 02-18-2004, 01:06 AM

I think they had a good idea, just didn't come through with a very good end product. I kinda like the one Jamis posted, that is a great improvement to an S-10! More info, please?

highboy_04 · 02-18-2004, 01:33 AM

the one that Jamis posted looks like it has newer ford taurus headlights in it.

krazy_texan · 02-18-2004, 01:51 AM

thats as fugly as putting lexus headlights in a 40 ford

gonebad2 · 02-18-2004, 03:02 AM

Not for me. I have old trucks and a new truck. I like both of them for different reasons. But I think I will keep the body panels where they belong.

71Chevy4-speed · 02-18-2004, 03:45 AM

Some people shouldn't breed. Why disgrace something great..... we will never know. Nothin against new trucks, I just like old ones.

juju808 · 02-18-2004, 10:08 AM

the first truck i am not a fan of, but the second... OMG that looks amazing... if only you could see that driving around town sometime...

sider68 · 02-18-2004, 10:27 AM

I,ll go against the grain here and say I like it.Though the way things are going now the new trucks are getting close in looks to the old(body styling wise)
As far as new boxes on old trucks..to each their own.At least with thr newer ones it is easier to get liners and covers.Plus it eliminates those ugly chains on the tailgate

trinic · 02-18-2004, 11:57 AM

trying to imitate an SSR, i guess.

Zumo · 02-18-2004, 12:05 PM

Actually I thought it would look good on a swb regular cab sportside truck. I think this may be the ONLY WAY it would look cool.

jamis · 02-18-2004, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Blue Beard
Jamis, where did you find that one........?

These have been around for a while now, before the SSR was even seen. It body stye is based on a 39 studebaker. The only thing I dont like is the bed body lines, I think it should be staighter on top. I was going to build one on my daily driver after it reached 100,000 miles, but changed my mine becuase of a few issues with it. I still think it looks like a nice "ROD" not really a truck. http://www.kreativerodwerks.com/Pricing/default.asp

trinic · 02-18-2004, 01:23 PM

i was talking bout the initial picture...

Quote:

Originally posted by jamis

These have been around for a while now, before the SSR was even seen.http://www.kreativerodwerks.com/Pricing/default.asp

**Palf70Step** · 02-18-2004, 03:11 PM

I saw one at Pigeon Forge last year (the 1500 conversion) and I didn't think it looks too bad. It looks better in person than in the adds. I kind of agree that it looks better on a short regular cab than the extended cab. I have seen much worse that is for sure. I think I like th one than makes it look like a 40 Ford on the front better though.

rambler · 02-18-2004, 03:46 PM

I think for the $$$,, I would just by Randy's T, but this I like! Would be cool to build and play with!

02-17-2004, 10:15 PM	#1
CG BlahBlahBlah Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Wa. Posts: 19,845	ok now this is ugly (imo) why?

02-17-2004, 10:22 PM	#2
jcueckert13 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Edgewood New Mexico Posts: 2,088	because a bunch of people want the look of the older trucks without having to give up the luxurys that come with a new truck. i agree they are ugly but to each his own __________________ 1990 subaru legcy (daily driver) 1987 Toyota 4runner (weekend toy) 1968 C30 flatbed dually 1970 C10 longbed stepside (in pieces) 1976 Dodge Dart 1963 Dodge Dart

02-17-2004, 10:28 PM	#4
superfly68 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Encinitas,CA Posts: 316	it just doesn't fit! a rounded front end with a boxy cab. __________________ no longer have a ride, but still a fan!

02-17-2004, 10:44 PM	#6
724x4a/cchevy Self-proclaimed LED man Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Harrisburg, Missouri Posts: 1,021	it just doesn't look good. Back then everyging was smooth and rounded. Those newer trucks are so boxy, kinda "shoebox chevy" looking. __________________ My LED Website My Photobucket Album of LED's Ask me about hand-made custom L.E.D brake and reverse lights. <- LINK I also do LED: -Third Brake/Cargo -Brake (truck and burb) -Reverse (truck and burb) -67-68 Front Turn Signals -69-70 Front Turn Signals -71-72 Front Turn Signals -GMC Front Turn Signals I can also do custom lights for other vehicles....i did a set for a AMC Gremlin once Norwood Survivor

02-18-2004, 12:21 AM	#8
jamis F.A.S.T. president Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Florida Posts: 1,883	I dont like those kits at all. The only one I like is this one...on an s-10 frame. Last edited by jamis; 10-05-2007 at 07:11 AM.

02-17-2004, 10:28 PM	#3
67Fleetsidedream Wiseass secured himself a BAN Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: MOON!!! Posts: 2,282	Far from ugly. It is FUGLY.

02-17-2004, 10:36 PM	#5
69 air cab Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Maryville, TN Posts: 477	pissing your money away

02-18-2004, 12:14 AM	#7
Longhorn Man its all about the +6 inches Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Hilliard Ohio Posts: 2,693	Looks just as bad as slapping the new bed on an old truck...just don't work.

02-18-2004, 12:23 AM	#9
stepside71 Project Money Pit Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Pensacola Florida Posts: 90	Oldakool rules and yes that is fugly.Longhorn Man you can say that again!Here's a question to ponder, why is it that pics of those trucks get layouts in magazines? __________________ For sale: GMC rad support $50, L/F 69-72 fender $50, (1) 69-72 & 67-68 Chevy hood $50 ea.,1 disc brake spindles w/ calipers and rotors $ 25 WTB: (1) R/F inner fender. OR will trade

02-18-2004, 12:26 AM	#10
1/2_man_1/2_amazing Louie Dog Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Glennie Mi..... 4 steps from heaven Posts: 290	The pic jamis posted I liked, but the other one. No thanks, not for me anyways, somthin just don't work with it. Cody __________________ Cody 1997 1500 4.3 Vortec "I wanted you to know, I love the way you smile, I wanna hold you high and steal your pain" -Seether

02-18-2004, 12:28 AM	#11
03glide Sell it before it's finished Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Wilmington, NC Posts: 631	"why is it that pics of those trucks get layouts in magazines?" Paid advertisement. The "fugly" comment fits perfect.

02-18-2004, 12:58 AM	#12
Blue Beard Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Washington State Posts: 8,834	Jamis, where did you find that one........? __________________ 1970 Chev CST 2003 Harley Fatboy 1975 Chevrolet Step Van 1956 Chev Bel Air 1977 Blazer 2WD For Sale $3000.00 1978 Blazer 2WD For Sale $7000.00 1978 Silverado 2005 Monte Carlo

02-18-2004, 01:06 AM	#13
barn9 Half a bubble off! Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Winfield, Ks, USA Posts: 5,588	I think they had a good idea, just didn't come through with a very good end product. I kinda like the one Jamis posted, that is a great improvement to an S-10! More info, please? __________________ Just call me LB. '71 Cheyenne, 402BB, hauls blondes, brunettes, or redheads.

02-18-2004, 01:33 AM	#14
highboy_04 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: kansas Posts: 1,071	the one that Jamis posted looks like it has newer ford taurus headlights in it. __________________ '67 c10 350/th350

02-18-2004, 01:51 AM	#15
krazy_texan Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Des Moines, Ia Posts: 3,233	thats as fugly as putting lexus headlights in a 40 ford __________________ Krazy Texan My Trucks are made with Wrenches not Chop Sticks 1967 GMC 3/4 ton "Johnny Cash" 1990 v1500 suburban 1967 Ford f100 Swb 4x4 "green bean" GOD BLESS JESUS, JOHN WAYNE, AND THE ALAMO



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

02-18-2004, 03:02 AM	#16
gonebad2 Merciless Butcher Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC Nevada Posts: 1,447	Not for me. I have old trucks and a new truck. I like both of them for different reasons. But I think I will keep the body panels where they belong. __________________ Your Bought And Sold....I Got Your Soul!

02-18-2004, 03:45 AM	#17
71Chevy4-speed Speed Limit = Floorboard Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Kasilof, Alaska Posts: 803	Some people shouldn't breed. Why disgrace something great..... we will never know. Nothin against new trucks, I just like old ones. __________________ 1971 C20 350, 4-speed - Sold. 1985 K10 350, Built 700r4, Edel 1406, Performer intake, MSD Ign, Hooker Comps, Silverstars, Piaa drivers, LED tails, Toyo A/T 31's, Eaton Posi, the project. "Build for torque, horsepower will follow"

02-18-2004, 10:08 AM	#18
juju808 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Denver Posts: 141	the first truck i am not a fan of, but the second... OMG that looks amazing... if only you could see that driving around town sometime... __________________ ...juju...

02-18-2004, 10:27 AM	#19
sider68 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: newmarket,ontario,canada Posts: 936	I,ll go against the grain here and say I like it.Though the way things are going now the new trucks are getting close in looks to the old(body styling wise) As far as new boxes on old trucks..to each their own.At least with thr newer ones it is easier to get liners and covers.Plus it eliminates those ugly chains on the tailgate Attached Images

02-18-2004, 11:57 AM	#20
trinic Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Wide awake Wylie (North Texas) Posts: 322	... trying to imitate an SSR, i guess.

02-18-2004, 12:05 PM	#21
Zumo Hot Rods For Life Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Waxahachie, TX Posts: 3,305	Actually I thought it would look good on a swb regular cab sportside truck. I think this may be the ONLY WAY it would look cool. __________________ 1968 C10 LWB **SOLD* Andy Viva Los Bicicletas! Los Muertos Custom Bicycles Last edited by Zumo; 10-04-2007 at 10:09 PM.

02-18-2004, 03:11 PM	#24
Palf70Step State of Confusion! Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Gulfport, MS USA Posts: 46,819	I saw one at Pigeon Forge last year (the 1500 conversion) and I didn't think it looks too bad. It looks better in person than in the adds. I kind of agree that it looks better on a short regular cab than the extended cab. I have seen much worse that is for sure. I think I like th one than makes it look like a 40 Ford on the front better though. __________________ Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!

02-18-2004, 03:46 PM	#25
rambler MOVE OVER Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Warrensburg, MO Posts: 5,470	I think for the $$$,, I would just by Randy's T, but this I like! Would be cool to build and play with! __________________ No matter where you are..... There you are... Buckaroo Banzi

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.