The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2005, 06:07 AM   #1
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
What is a 351 V6?

I was told the other day to think of a 454 with 2 cylinders cut off. Is this correct and is it a good engine for both power and fuel effiency?
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 06:51 AM   #2
kbs71
71 rustless in texas
 
kbs71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 257
Way back when I wuz a ungun' about 27 years ago, I had a 1959 GMC with a 351 V6 in it. I got it from a guy who used it as a tractor. He pulled stumps with it. I drove it for about 2 years, never put new oil in it, always used oil that had come out of my Dad's car. After about a year it spun a rod bearing. I drove it 46 miles one way to work every day (every day that I could get up and make it) or the work week. It NEVER died on me. I could tell stories after stories about that old truck. As for gas milage, at that time who cared. but it has to be the most reliable, torquest(is that a word) engine that I've ever had. I finally got a better mode of transportation and let it sit at my Dad's house after about 6 months he had it towed.
Oh well
kbs71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 06:51 AM   #3
kbs71
71 rustless in texas
 
kbs71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 257
I forgot, I was told there were made primarly for Canadian trucks.
kbs71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 09:18 AM   #4
68jimmy
Registered User
 
68jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: albuquerque
Posts: 431
check out this site, lots of great information...

http://www.6066gmcguy.org/305V6.htm
__________________
78 C10 LWB Super Cheyenne
68jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 09:19 AM   #5
68w/sbc406
Got Light Emitting Diode?
 
68w/sbc406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
i am not sure of the bore/stroke but i have read that they are torque monsters. gas milage sucks though. and max rpm is around 3500. probably not good on the highway
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags

'02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car)

1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler
68w/sbc406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 10:54 AM   #6
shelby987
Registered User
 
shelby987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
I was looking at this the other day, I included a link to the thread I had. I believe the bore/stroke is on the line of 4.56/3.58 or somewhere about those numbers. After personally driving one, I can say that it is amazingly torquie (sp) engine, my test drive on an engine that desprately needed a tune up consistantly spun the wheels in 2nd (sm465....so first is basicaly 5mph and under), but it wouldn't spin those wheels until it hit 2,500 rpm....(assuming its the max torque point). Anyhoo, I am looking at a truck right now with the same setup, and the advice I have been given, is its a truck engine, not really a highly streetable engine. Right now I am debating whether or not I should buy it and drop 3.08's in the rear just to be able to use it as a driver.....don't have as many occasions to pull stumps at the moment as I would like!
in case you were wondering, the power rating for the engine is 180-220hp (depends on the variant 351s or e if memory serves) and 320ft-lbs.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php3?t=156049
shelby987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 01:26 PM   #7
TP from Cntl PA
Registered User
 
TP from Cntl PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central PA....In the Berg of Nisbet
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelby987
but it wouldn't spin those wheels until it hit 2,500 rpm....(assuming its the max torque point).
I thought peak torque was made much lower than that in the V-6's............People are always amazed when they ride with me hauling a nice big load of 2-B stone...........I let the 305 V-6 in my '69 1-ton GMC lug right down. They're always like "Shift it-Shift it!!" I tell them "Nope, the old hog likes to lug"
__________________
'72 K-20 EFI'ed 250 Inline/4spd stake body, Farm Truck
'71 C-20 Cummins Diesel Powered, In storage thanks to $5.00 diesel!
'69 3500 GMC 305V-6/4spd, Still under reconstruction..........

Inlines Rule! 6 soldiers standing is better than 8 laying down!!!!!!!!
TP from Cntl PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 11:23 PM   #8
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Peak Torque on most of the V6's is between 1400 - 1600 RPM depending on the size and year.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2005, 12:50 AM   #9
Fred T
Cantankerous Geezer
 
Fred T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvmy72
I was told the other day to think of a 454 with 2 cylinders cut off Is this correct and is it a good engine for both power and fuel effiency?
No relation at all. Completely different engines.

The engine is a torque-monster. It is not good for sustained speed above 2,500 rpm. The block is a high nickel content, and will last a long time at low speeds. Acceleration is poor. The 351 was used mainly in 2 ton trucks. The 305 was in pickups. Jolly's webpage has a lot of info on these engines.
__________________
Fred

There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.
Fred T is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com