Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-16-2024, 10:40 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,077
|
Re: 1967 GMC V6 305 cu in...
Quote:
[A 292 at .030-over is 296 CuIn.] The Ford L6 300 is a reverse-engineered 292 copy. [Or is it I-6 in Fordish? IDK. Don't speak it.] They came out with it in 1965. The L25 292 came out in 1963. Enough time to buy one, take it apart, and copy it. The 300 Ford has its Carb, intake and exhaust on the Passenger side, and the distributor on the driver side. Pure ''reverse'' engineering.
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. |
|
04-18-2024, 09:34 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: west coast
Posts: 3,356
|
Re: 1967 GMC V6 305 cu in...
Quote:
|
|
04-19-2024, 12:41 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,077
|
Re: 1967 GMC V6 305 cu in...
Quote:
Along the way I picked up another MY '63 292 core from Warrens69GMC who was working at a Checker Auto in Tucson. When these trucks were the current product, GM dealers pushed V8s and Automatic transmissions hard. I have never seen a Blazer or Jimmy with a Factory L25 292. I think the fact that the L25 requires a special diagonal crossmember in the 4X4s was one stumbling block. One parts counter guy at the Chevy dealer's said ''the 292 was Chevy's best kept secret.'' It's a very strong engine, with surplus torque that weighs 100 lbs less than an SBC. My 292 with modifications and aftermarket equipment outperforms the 350 crate motor in my '71 Jimmy.
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. Last edited by '68OrangeSunshine; 04-19-2024 at 12:46 AM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|